An average time to diagnosis of 7 years is commonly described for endometriosis; diagnostic delay for adenomyosis is unknown. This cross-sectional study aimed to describe diagnostic delay for endometriosis and adenomyosis and to investigate the factors associated with this delay.
Methods:
Community of Patients for Research (ComPaRe)-Endometriosis is a prospective e-cohort of women with endometriosis and/or adenomyosis in France. About 6,949 participants were included. We used linear regression modeling to assess factors associated with diagnostic delay, after adjustment for age, education level, body mass index, number of comorbidities, and family history of the disease or of chronic pelvic pain (CPP).
Results:
The average diagnostic delay was 10 years for endometriosis and 11 years for adenomyosis. Factors associated with a significantly longer diagnostic delay were year of diagnosis (+0.34 years, p < 0.0001), unemployment (+0.7 years, p = 0.01), number of comorbidities (+0.3 years, p < 0.0001), family history of the disease or of CPP (+1.1 years, p < 0.0001), severe dysmenorrhea before diagnosis (numeric-rating scale: +0.8 years, p < 0.0001), number of health professionals consulted before diagnosis (+0.3 years, p < 0.0001), and presence of multiple symptoms leading to first consultation (+1.6 years, p < 0.0001). In contrast, factors associated with a shorter delay were a financial position perceived as comfortable (−1.4 years, p < 0.0001), age at menarche (−0.6 years, p < 0.0001), and age at first symptoms (−0.8 years, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions:
This study highlights several factors associated with diagnostic delay among women with self-reported endometriosis and/or adenomyosis and provides new insights to improve care by informing both clinicians and patients. Attention to these profiles may improve disease management.
NnoahamKE, HummelshojL, WebsterP, et al.; World Endometriosis Research Foundation Global Study of Women’s Health consortium. Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: A multicenter study across ten countries. Fertil Steril, 2011; 96(2):366–373.e8.
6.
SinghS, SolimanAM, RahalY, et al.Prevalence, Symptomatic Burden, and Diagnosis of Endometriosis in Canada: Cross-Sectional Survey of 30 000 Women. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 2020; 10.
7.
HanXT, GuoHY, KongDL, et al.Analysis of characteristics and influence factors of diagnostic delay of endometriosis. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, 2018; 53(2):92–98.
8.
ArmourM, SinclairJ, NgCHM, et al.Endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain have similar impact on women, but time to diagnosis is decreasing: An Australian survey. Sci Rep, 2020; 10(1):16253; doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73389-2
9.
AubryG, BencharifC, VesaleE, et al.[Delays and pathways for patients with endometriosis in France: A multicenter study]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol, 2023; 51(2):117–122; doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2022.11.006
10.
EllisK, MunroD, WoodR. The experiences of endometriosis patients with diagnosis and treatment in New Zealand. Front Glob Womens Health, 2022; 3:991045; doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.991045
11.
GhaiV, JanH, ShakirF, et al.Diagnostic delay for superficial and deep endometriosis in the United Kingdom. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2020; 40(1):83–89; doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1603217
12.
MousaM, JefoutAL, AlsafarM, et al.Impact of endometriosis in women of arab ancestry on: Health-related quality of life, work productivity, and diagnostic delay. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health, 2021; 2; doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.708410
13.
PinoI, BelloniGM, BarberaV, et al.“Better late than never but never late is better”, especially in young women. A multicenter Italian study on diagnostic delay for symptomatic endometriosis. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 2023; 28(1):10–16; doi: 10.1080/13625187.2022.2128644
14.
Tewhaiti-SmithJ, SempriniA, BushD, et al.An Aotearoa New Zealand survey of the impact and diagnostic delay for endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain. Sci Rep, 2022; 12(1):4425; doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08464-x
15.
StaalAHJ, van der ZandenM, NapAW. Diagnostic delay of endometriosis in the netherlands. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2016; 81(4):321–324.
16.
ArrudaMS, PettaCA, AbrãoMS, et al.Time elapsed from onset of symptoms to diagnosis of endometriosis in a cohort study of Brazilian women. Hum Reprod, 2003; 18(4):756–759.
17.
GreeneR, StrattonP, ClearySD, et al.Diagnostic experience among 4,334 women reporting surgically diagnosed endometriosis. Fertil Steril, 2009; 91(1):32–39; doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.020
18.
HarzifAK, NurbaetiP, Sayogo PutriA, et al.Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of endometriosis: A systematic review. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord, 2024; doi: 10.1177/22840265241291120
19.
SimpsonCN, LomiguenCM, ChinJ. Combating diagnostic delay of endometriosis in adolescents via educational awareness: A systematic review. Cureus, 2021; 13(5):e15143; doi: 10.7759/cureus.15143
20.
BallardK, LowtonK, WrightJ. What’s the delay? A qualitative study of women’s experiences of reaching a diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril, 2006; 86(5):1296–1301.
21.
HudelistG, FritzerN, ThomasA, et al.Diagnostic delay for endometriosis in Austria and Germany: Causes and possible consequences. Hum Reprod, 2012; 27(12):3412–3416.
22.
SeearK. The etiquette of endometriosis: Stigmatisation, menstrual concealment and the diagnostic delay. Soc Sci Med, 2009; 69(8):1220–1227.
23.
PugsleyZ, BallardK. Management of endometriosis in general practice: The pathway to diagnosis. The British Journal of General Practice. J R Coll Gen Pract, 2007.
24.
EllisK, WoodR. A decade to wait: Update on the average delay to diagnosis for endometriosis in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2024; 64(5):524–529; doi: 10.1111/ajo.13836
25.
BourdonM, MaignienC, GiraudetG, et al.Investigating the medical journey of endometriosis-affected women: Results from a cross-sectional web-based survey (EndoVie) on 1,557 French women. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod, 2024; 53(2):102708; doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102708
26.
TranV-T, RavaudP. COllaborative open platform E-cohorts for research acceleration in trials and epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol, 2020; 124:139–148.
27.
VitonisAF, VincentK, RahmiogluN, et al.; WERF EPHect Working Group. World endometriosis research foundation endometriosis phenome and biobanking harmonization project: II. clinical and covariate phenotype data collection in endometriosis research. Fertil Steril, 2014; 102(5):1223–1232; doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1244
28.
BeckerCM, LauferMR, StrattonP, et al.; WERF EPHect Working Group. World endometriosis research foundation endometriosis phenome and biobanking harmonisation project: I. surgical phenotype data collection in endometriosis research. Fertil Steril, 2014; 102(5):1213–1222.
29.
KennedyS, BergqvistA, ChapronC, et al.; ESHRE Special Interest Group for Endometriosis and Endometrium Guideline Development Group. ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod, 2005; 20(10):2698–2704; doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei135
30.
DunselmanGAJ, VermeulenN, BeckerC, et al.; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE guideline: Management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod, 2014; 29(3):400–412; doi: 10.1093/humrep/det457
31.
GouesbetS, LambertS, AmazouzH, et al.Assessment of past endometriosis pain over the life course: A repeatability study within the ComPaRe-Endometriosis cohort. European Journal of Pain 2025; 29:(6):e70040; doi: 10.1002/ejp.70040
32.
JainV, MunroMG, CritchleyHOD. Contemporary evaluation of women and girls with abnormal uterine bleeding: FIGO Systems 1 and 2. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2023; 162(Suppl 2):29–42; doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14946
33.
HadfieldR, MardonH, BarlowD, et al.Delay in the diagnosis of endometriosis: A survey of women from the USA and the UK. Hum Reprod, 1996; 11(4):878–880; doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019270
34.
HusbyGK, HaugenRS, MoenMH. Diagnostic delay in women with pain and endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2003; 82(7):649–653; doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00168.x
35.
SantosTMV, PereiraAMG, LopesRGC, et al.Lag time between onset of symptoms and diagnosis of endometriosis. Einstein (Sao Paulo), 2012; 10(1):39–43; doi: 10.1590/s1679-45082012000100009
36.
SolimanAM, FuldeoreM, SnabesMC. Factors associated with time to endometriosis diagnosis in the united states. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2017; 26(7):788–797.
37.
FryerJ, Mason-JonesAJ, WoodwardA. Understanding diagnostic delay for endometriosis: A scoping review using the social-ecological framework. Health Care Women Int, 2025; 46(3):335–351; doi: 10.1080/07399332.2024.2413056
38.
SimsOT, GuptaJ, MissmerSA, et al.Stigma and endometriosis: A brief overview and recommendations to improve psychosocial Well-Being and diagnostic delay. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021; 18(15):8210; doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158210
39.
SurreyE, SolimanAM, TrenzH, et al.Impact of endometriosis diagnostic delays on healthcare resource utilization and costs. Adv Ther, 2020; 37(3):1087–1099; doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01215-x
40.
MelgaardA, VestergaardCH, KesmodelUS, et al.Utilization of healthcare prior to endometriosis diagnosis: A Danish case-control study. Hum Reprod, 2023; 38(10):1910–1917; doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead164
41.
FacchinF, BuggioL, OttoliniF, et al.Preliminary insights on the relation between endometriosis, pelvic pain, and employment. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2019; 84(2):190–195.
42.
KumarV, KhanM, VilosGA, et al.Revisiting the Association Between Endometriosis and Bipolar Disorder. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2011; 33(11):1141–1145.
43.
KvaskoffM, MuF, TerryKL, et al.Endometriosis: A high-risk population for major chronic diseases? Hum Reprod Update, 2015; 21(4):500–516; doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv013
44.
ShigesiN, KvaskoffM, KirtleyS, et al.The association between endometriosis and autoimmune diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update, 2019; 25(4):486–503.
45.
HallJI. Obesity – a reluctance to treat? Obes Facts, 2010; 3(2):79–80; doi: 10.1159/000304766
46.
PhelanSM, BurgessDJ, YeazelMW, et al.Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity. Obes Rev, 2015; 16(4):319–326; doi: 10.1111/obr.12266
47.
Van der ZandenM, de KokL, NelenWLDM, et al.Strengths and weaknesses in the diagnostic process of endometriosis from the patients’ perspective: A focus group study. Diagnosis, 2021; 8(3):333–339.
48.
Van der ZandenM, ArensMWJ, BraatDDM, et al.Gynaecologists’ view on diagnostic delay and care performance in endometriosis in the Netherlands. Reprod Biomed Online, 2018; 37(6):761–768; doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.09.006
49.
Van der ZandenM, TeunissenDAM, van der WoordIW, et al.Barriers and facilitators to the timely diagnosis of endometriosis in primary care in the Netherlands. Fam Pract, 2020; 37(1):131–136; doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz041
50.
BallwegML. Impact of endometriosis on women’s health: Comparative historical data show that the earlier the onset, the more severe the disease. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2004; 18(2):201–218; doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.01.003
51.
AgarwalSK, ChapronC, GiudiceLC, et al.Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: A call to action. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019; 220(4):354.e1–354.e12.
52.
DavenportS, SmithD, GreenDJ. Barriers to a timely diagnosis of endometriosis: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol, 2023; 142(3):571–583; doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005255
53.
MoonCM, JungS-A, KimS-E, et al.; CONNECT study group. Clinical factors and disease course related to diagnostic delay in korean crohn’s disease patients: Results from the connect study. PLoS One, 2015; 10(12):e0144390; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144390
54.
ZhaoSS, PittamB, HarrisonNL, et al.Diagnostic delay in axial spondyloarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2021; 60(4):1620–1628; doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa807
