This study examined the meaning of “belonging” or membership in four secondary level general education classes. One or two students with moderate or severe disabilities were enrolled in each of these classes. Participant observations and interviews were used to gain an understanding of participation and membership from the perspectives of students without disabilities who attended these classes. Findings indicated that student membership depends on affiliation with a subgroup of peers within the class. General class participation and interactions influenced an individual's status within the group, but were not enough to create member status. General education students also reported taking active steps when they joined a class to get connected with a subgroup. In these classes, only two students with disabilities connected with subgroups and were, therefore, viewed as members. Considerations are offered for promoting classroom membership for students with moderate or severe disabilities.
BiklenD. (1985). Achieving the complete school. New York: Teachers College Press.
2.
BiklenD. (1992). Schooling without labels. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
3.
BiklenD. (1993) Communication unbound. New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
BogdanR.BiklenS. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education. Boston: Allyn 8#x38; Bacon.
5.
CalculatorS. (1994). Communicative intervention as a means to successful inclusion. In CalculatorS. N.JorgensonC. M., Including students with severe disabilities in schools (pp. 183–214). San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
6.
ChangH. (1992). Adolescent life and ethos: An ethnography of a U.S. high school. Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
7.
CusickP. (1973). Inside high school: The students world. New York: Holt, Rinehart 8#x38; Winston.
8.
DelamontS.GaltonM. (1986). Inside the secondary classroom. New York: Routledge 8#x38; Kegan Paul.
9.
EpsteinJ.KarweitS. (Eds.) (1983). Friends in school: Patterns of selection and influence in secondary schools. New York: Academic Press.
10.
EvansI.SalisburyC.PalombaroM.BerrymanJ.HollowoodT. M. (1992). Peer interactions and social acceptance of elementary-age children with severe disabilities in an inclusive school. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 205–212.
11.
EverhartR. (1983). Reading, writing and resistance: Adolescence and labor in a junior high school. New York: Routledge 8#x38; Kegan Paul.
12.
FarleyL. (1996). A quartet of success stories: Making inclusion work. Educational Leadership, 53, 51–55.
13.
FergusonD. (1994). Is communication really the point? Some thoughts on interventions and membership. Mental Retardation, 32(1), 7–18.
14.
FergusonP. M.FergusonD. L.TaylorS. J. (Eds.) (1992). Interpreting disability: A qualitative reader. New York: Teachers College Press.
15.
ForestM. (1988). Full inclusion is possible. Impact: Feature Issue on Integrated Education, 1(1), 2–4.
16.
ForestM.LusthausE. (1989). Promoting educational equality for all students: Circles and maps. In StainbackS.StainbackW.ForestM. (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education (pp. 43–58). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
17.
GrantC.SleeterC. E. (1986). After the schoolbell rings. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
18.
HaringT. (1993). Research basis of instructional procedures to promote social interaction and integration. In GableR. A.WarrenS. F. (Eds.), Strategies for teaching students with mild to severe mental retardation (pp. 129–164). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
19.
JakupcakJ. (1993). Innovative classroom programs for full inclusion. In PutnamJ. W. (Ed.), Cooperative learning and strategies for inclusion (pp. 163–180). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
20.
JorgensonC. M. (1992). Natural supports in inclusive schools: Curricular and teaching strategies. In NisbetJ. (Ed.), Natural supports in school, at work, and in the community for people with disabilities (pp. 179–216). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
21.
JorgensonC. M. (1993). Student inclusion checklist: Assesses a student's membership, participation, friendships and educational program via inclusion indicators. Durham, NH: Institute on Disability.
22.
JorgensonC. M. (1994). Developing inclusive educational programs. In CalculatorS. N.JorgensonC. M., Including students with severe disabilities in schools (pp. 27–74). San Diego: Singular Publishing.
23.
KennedyC. H.ItkonenT. (1994). Some effects of regular class placement on the social contacts and social networks of high school students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 1–10.
24.
KishiG.MeyerL. (1994). What children report and remember: A six-year follow-up of the effects of social contact between peers with and without severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 277–289.
25.
KuncN. (1992). The need to belong: Rediscovering Maslow's hierarchy of needs. In VillaR. A.ThousandJ. S.StainbackW.StainbackS. (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education (pp. 25–40). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
26.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Establishing trustworthiness. In LincolnY. S.GubaE. G., Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
LightfootS. L. (1983). The good high school. New York: Basic Books.
28.
MeyerL. H. (1994). Quality inclusive schooling: How to know it when you see it. TASH Newsletter20(10) 18–22.
29.
MeyerL. H.EichingerJ. (1994). Program quality indicators (PQI): A checklist of most promising practices in educational programs for students with disabilities, (3rd ed.) Syracuse: Syracuse University School of Education.
30.
NisbetJ. (1992). Natural supports in school, at work, and in the community for people with disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
31.
PutnamJ. W. (1993). The movement toward teaching and learning in inclusive classrooms. In PutnamJ. W. (Ed.), Cooperative learning and strategies for inclusion (pp. 1–14). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
32.
SalisburyC.GallucciC.PalombaroM. M.PeckC. (1995). Strategies that promote social relations among elementary students with and without severe disabilities in inclusive schools. Exceptional Children, 62, 125–137.
SnowJ.ForestM. (1987). Circles. In ForestM. (Ed.), More education integration (pp. 169–176). *Downsview, Ontario, Canada: G. Allen Roeher Institute.
35.
SolomonD.SchapsE.WatsonM.BattistichV. (1992). Creating caring school and classroom communities for all students. In VillaR. A.ThousandJ. S.StainbackW.StainbackS. (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education (pp. 41–60). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
36.
StainbackS.StainbackW. (1990). Inclusive schooling. In StainbackW.StainbackS. (Eds.), Support networks for inclusive schools (pp. 3–24). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
37.
StaubD.SchwartzI. S.GallucciC.PeckC. A. (1994). Four portraits of friendship at an inclusive school. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 314–325.
38.
StrullyJ.StrullyC. (1989). Friendships as an educational goal. In StainbackS.StainbackW.ForestM. (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education (pp. 59–68). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
39.
TashieC.Shapiro-BarnardS.DillonA.D.SchuhM.JorgensonC.NisbetJ. (1993). Changes in latitudes, changes in attitudes: The role of the inclusion facilitator. Durham, NH: Institute on Disability, UAP. University of New Hampshire.
40.
TaylorS. J.BogdanR. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings. New York: Wiley 8#x38; Sons.
41.
VillaR.ThousandJ. (1992). Student collaboration: An essential for curriculum delivery in the 21st century. In StainbackS.StainbackW. (Eds.), Curriculum considerations in inclusive classrooms (pp. 117–142). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
42.
VoeltzL. (1982). Effects of structured interactions with severely handicapped peers on children's attitudes. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 380–390.
