Some Benefits Nonhandicapped Adolescents Perceive for Themselves from Their Social Relationships with Peers who Have Severe Handicaps

Abstract

The perceptions of 21 nonhandicapped high school students were investigated in regard to the benefits they had experienced as a result of developing relationships with peers who had moderate or severe disabilities. Semi-structured interviews with the nonhandicapped students indicated their experiences resulted in six types of benefits: (a) improvements in self-concept, (b) growth in social cognition, (c) increased tolerance of other people, (d) reduced fear of human differences, (e) development of personal principles, and (f) interpersonal acceptance and friendship. Students also identified areas of difficulty they had experienced in their relationships with peers having disabilities. Results are discussed in terms of implications for policy analysis and research on social integration.

Keywords

adolescents friendship integration interviewing mainstreaming nonhandicapped peers qualitative research social relationships

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bilden

Corrigan

Quick

(1989). Beyond obligation: Students' relations with each other in integrated classes. In Lipsky

Gartner

, (Eds.), Beyond separate education: Quality education for all (pp. 207–221). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Bricker

(1978). A rationale for the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped preschool children. In Guralnick

M. J.

(Ed.), Early intervention and the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children (pp. 3–26). Baltimore: University Park Press.

Bronfenbrenner

(1986). Alienation and the four worlds of childhood. The Phi Delta Kappan, 67 (6), 431–436.

Brown

Branston

M. B.

Hamre-Nietupsky

Johnson

Wilcox

Gruenewald

(1979). A rationale for comprehensive longitudinal interactions between severely handicapped students and nonhandicapped students and other citizens. AAESPH Review, 4, 3–14.

Gaylord-Ross

Peck

C. A.

(1985). Integration efforts for students with severe mental retardation. In Bricker

Filler

, (Eds.), Severe retardation: From theory to practice (pp. 185–207). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

Giangreco

Putnam

(1990). Supporting the education of students with severe disabilities in regular education environments. In Meyer

Peck

Brown

(Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 245–270). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Press.

Haring

T. G.

(1990). Social relationships. In Meyer

Peck

Brown

(Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 195–217). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

(1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

10.

Murray-Seegert

(1989). Nasty girls, thugs, and humans like us: Social relations between severely disabled and nondisabled students in high school. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

11.

Peck

C. A.

Carlson

Helmstetter

(1989). Integrating children with handicaps into early childhood education programs: Parent and teacher perceptions of benefits for nonhandicapped children. Final report submitted to the Washington State Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, Olympia, WA.

12.

Ryan

(1988). Teacher education and moral education. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(5), 18–23.

13.

Snyder

Apolloni

Cooke

T. P.

(1977). Integrated settings at the early childhood level: The role of nonretarded peers. Exceptional Children, 43, 262–266.

14.

Wolfensberger

(1972). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto, Canada: National Institute on Mental Retardation.