Two supervisory procedures for promoting the conduct of in vivo probes by six special education teacher aides were examined. The first procedure served as baseline and consisted of inservice training, self-regulated probing and data recording, and incidental modeling by the primary investigator. This procedure produced poor probing performance, reflecting inconsistency, low frequency, and differential sensitivity toward the three participating students. The second procedure consisted of the addition of delivering data cards to aides, thus prompting them to conduct daily probes. This additional component resulted in a 53% increase in the level of probing and was accompanied by less variability, higher sustained rates of probing, and more equitable probing of the students. Two types of reversal probes produced evidence that (a) the investigator's absence and (b) his presence without delivering cards occasioned low performance levels. Both conceptual (stimulus-control analysis) and applied (aides' preference for students) implications are discussed.
BoomerL. W. (1982). The paraprofessional: A valued resource for special children and their teachers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 14, 194–197.
2.
BullockD. H. (1982, September). Guiding job performance with job aids. Training and Development Journal, 36–42.
3.
BurchM. R.ReissM. L.BaileyJ. S. (1987). A competency-based “hands-on” training package for direct care staff. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 67–71.
4.
CarrE. G.TaylorJ. C.RobinsonS. (1991). The effects of severe behavior problems in children on the teaching behavior of adults. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 523–535.
5.
ColesE.BlundenR. (1981). Maintaining new procedures using feedback to staff, a heirarchical reporting system, and a multidisciplinary management group. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 3(2), 19–33.
6.
FrithG. H.LindseyJ. D. (1982). Certification, training, and other programming variables affecting special education and the paraprofessional concept. Journal of Special Education, 16, 229–263.
7.
GladstoneB. W.SpencerC. J. (1977). The effects of modeling on the contingent praise of mental retardation counsellors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 75–84.
8.
GreeneB. F.WillisB. S.LevyR.BaileyJ. S. (1978). Measuring client gains from staff-implemented programs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 395–412.
9.
HalleJ. W.BaerD. M.SpradlinJ. E. (1981). Teachers' generalized use of delay as a stimulus control procedure to increase language use in handicapped children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 389–409.
10.
HaringT. (1982). The training and generalization of greeting response behaviors to severely emotionally disturbed pupils. In Gaylord RossR.HaringT.BreenC.Pitts-ConwayV. (Eds.), The social integration of autistic and severely handicapped students. San Francisco: San Francisco State University.
11.
IvancicM. T.ReidD. H.IwataB. A.FawG. D.PageT. J. (1981). Evaluating a supervision program for developing and maintaining therapeutic staff-resident interactions during institutional care routines. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 95–107.
12.
KazdinA. E. (1973). Issues in behavior modification with mentally retarded persons. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78, 134–140.
13.
KazdinA. E. (1982a, December). Observer effects: Reactivity of direct observation. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, 14, 5–19.
14.
KazdinA. E. (1982b). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
KunzG. R.LutzkerJ. R.CuvoA. J.EddlemanJ.LutzkerS. Z.MegsonD.GulleyB. (1982). Evaluating strategies to improve careprovider performance on health and development tasks in an infant care facility. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 521–531.
16.
LindemanD. P.BeegleG. P. (1988). Preservice teacher training and the use of the classroom paraprofessional: A national survey. Teacher Education and Special Education, 11, 183–186.
17.
LindseyJ. D. (1983). Paraprofessionals in learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 467–471.
18.
McKenzieR. G.HoukC. S. (1986). Use of paraprofessionals in the resource room. Exceptional Children, 53, 41–45.
19.
MooreE. (1977). The education of the paraprofessional. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 12, 296–303.
20.
PanyanM.BoozerH.MorrisN. (1970). Feedback to attendants as a reinforcer for applying operant techniques. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 1–4.
21.
ParsonsM. B.SchepisM. M.ReidD. H.McCarnJ. E.GreenC. W. (1987). Expanding the impact of behavioral staff management: A large-scale, long-term application in schools serving severely handicapped students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 139–150.
22.
QuilitchR. H. (1975). A comparison of three staff-management procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 59–66.
23.
ReidD. H.ParsonsM. B.GreenC. W. (1989). Staff management in human services: Behavioral research and application. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
24.
ReidD. H.WhitmanT. L. (1983). Behavioral staff management in institutions: A critical review of effectiveness and acceptability. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 3, 131–149.
25.
ReitzA. L.HawkinsR. P. (1982). Increasing the attendance of nursing home residents at group recreation activities. Behavior Therapy, 13, 283–290.
26.
ReppA. C.DeitzD. E. D. (1979). Improving administrative-related staff behaviors at a state institution. Mental Retardation, 17, 185–192.
27.
SeysD. M.DukerP. C. (1986). Effects of a supervisory treatment package on staff-mentally retarded resident interactions. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 90, 388–394.
28.
SkinnerB. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
29.
SneedT. J.BibleG. H. (1979). An administrative procedure for improving staff performance in an institutional setting for retarded persons. Mental Retardation, 17, 92–94.
30.
StokesT. F.BaerD. M.JacksonR. L. (1974). Programming the generalization of a greeting response in four retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 599–610.
31.
TaylorJ. C.CarrE. G. (1993). Reciprocal social influences in the analysis and intervention of severe challenging behavior. In ReichleJ.WackerD. (Eds.). Communicative alternatives to challenging behavior: Vol. 3. Integrating functional assessment and intervention strategies. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
32.
WhitmanT. L.ScibakJ. W.ReidD. H. (1983). Caregiver training and management programs. Behavior modification with the severely and profoundly retarded: Research and application. New York: Academic Press.
33.
WhyteR. A.Van HoutenR.HunterW. (1983). The effects of public posting on teachers' performance of supervision duties. Education and Treatment of Children, 6, 21–28.
