This study examined the relationship between the type of assessment report and educators' expectations for students with severe disabilities. Eighty-four educators were randomly assigned to one of two groups reading differing styles of assessment reports for the same student with severe disabilities. Group 1 read a developmental assessment report with mental and developmental ages, while Group 2 read an ecological assessment report with documentation of the student's observed competencies in his daily environment. After reading the report, participants predicted the child's achievement on an Individualized Education Program (IEP) Questionnaire. Differences in group means for total IEP scores were analyzed using at test for independent means. Results indicated that educators reading the ecological assessment report had significantly higher expectations for student accomplishment of IEP objectives than those reading developmental reports.
AlgozzineB.WebberJ.CampbellM.MooreS.GilliamJ. (1980). Classroom decision making as a function of diagnostic labels and perceived competence. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 197 518).
2.
AlgozzineB.YsseldykeJ. (1980). Decision makers' prediction of students' academic difficulties as a function of referral information. Journal of Educational Research, 73, 145–150.
3.
BabadE. (1985). Some correlates of teachers' expectancy bias. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 175–183.
4.
BatesP.MorrowS. A.PancsofarE.SedlakR. (1984). The effect of functional vs. nonfunctional activities on attitudes, expectations of non-handicapped college students: What they see is what we get. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 73–78.
5.
BlankenshipC. S. (1985). Using curriculum-based assessment to make instructional decisions. Exceptional Children, 52, 233–238.
6.
BrophyJ.GoodT. (1970). Teachers' communication of differential expectations for childrens' classroom performance: Some behavioral data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 365–374.
7.
BrowderD. (1987). Assessment of individuals with severe handicaps. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
8.
BrownL.BranstonM. B.Hamre-NietupskiS.PumpianI.CertoN.GrunewaldL. (1979). A strategy for developing chronological-age appropriate and functional curricular content for severely handicapped adolescents and young adults. Journal of Special Education, 3, 81–90.
9.
ChaikinA.SiglerE.DerlegaV. (1974). Nonverbal mediators of teacher expectation effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 144–149.
10.
ColeK. N.SwisherV.ThompsonM. D.FewellR. R. (1985). Enhancing sensitivity of assessment instruments for children: Graded multi-dimensional scoring. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 209–213.
11.
CooperH. M. (1979). Some effects of preperformance information on academic expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 375–380.
12.
DonnellanA. M. (1984). The criterion of the least dangerous assumption. Behavioral Disorders, 9, 141–149.
13.
DuncanD.SbardellatiE.MaheadyL.SainatoD. (1981). Nondiscriminatory assessment of severely physically handicapped individuals. The Journal of The Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6, 17–22.
14.
DusekJ. B.O'ConnellE. J. (1973). Teacher expectancy effects on the achievement of test performance of elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 371–377.
15.
GillungT. B.RuckerC. N. (1977). Labels and teacher expectations. Exceptional Children, 43, 464–465.
16.
GoodT. L. (1987). Two decades of research on teacher expectations: Findings and future directions. Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 32–47.
17.
HornerR. H.McDonnellJ. J.BellamyT. (1984). Efficient instruction of generalized behaviors: General case programming in simulation and natural settings. In HornerR. H.VoeltzL. M.FredericksH. D. (Eds.), Education of learners with severe handicaps: Exemplary service strategies. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
18.
HuebnerE. S. (1987). Teachers' special education decisions: Does test information make a difference?Journal of Educational Research, 80, 202–205.
19.
HuppS. C.DonofrioM. N. (1983). Assessment of multiply and severely handicapped learners for the development of cross-referenced objectives. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 8, 17–28.
20.
IronsD.IronsT.MadduxC. (1984). A survey of perceived competence among psychologists who evaluate students with severe handicaps. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 55–60.
21.
RosenthalR.JacobsonL. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
22.
SigafoosJ.ColeD.McQuarterR. J. (1987). Current practices in the assessment of students with severe handicaps. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 264–273.
23.
SnellM. E. (Ed.). (1987). Systematic instruction of persons with severe handicaps (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
24.
SwannW.SnyderM. (1980). On translating beliefs into action: Theories of ability and their application in an instructional setting. Journal of Personality and School Psychology, 38, 879–888.
25.
VoeltzL. M.EvansI. M.FreedlandK.DonellonS. (1982). Teacher decision making in the selection of educational programming priorities for severely handicapped students. Journal of Special Education, 16, 179–198.
26.
WackerD. P.SteilD. A.GreenbaumF. T. (1983). Assessment of skills of multiply handicapped preschoolers and prediction of classroom performance. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 8, 65–78.
27.
WelchB. L. (1938). The significance of the difference between two means when the population variances are unequal. Biometrika, 29, 350–362.
28.
WolraichM. L.SipersteinG. N. (1983). Assessing professionals' prognostic impressions of mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 21, 8–12.
29.
YsseldykeJ. E. (1980). Diagnostic decision making in individuals susceptible to biasing information presented in the referral case folder. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 197 513).
