Where Are the Generalized Outcomes? (An Examination of Instructional Objectives)

Abstract

It is argued that behavioral objectives will be most useful when they are not only technologically adequate and include functional target behaviors, but when generalization is explicitly specified as a desired educational outcome as well. This investigation was undertaken to determine whether IEP objectives for selected pupils in participating schools included generalization as an outcome of instruction. It was found that although a considerable number of objectives related to the development of potentially functional skills, very few suggested the desirability of generalized performance. Possible reasons for the omission of generalized outcomes are discussed and recommendations are provided for the construction of objectives.

Keywords

generalization instructional objectives IEPs functional skills

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baer

D. M.

Wolf

M. M.

Risley

T. R.

(1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.

Brown

Nietupski

Hamre-Nietupski

(1976). Criterion of ultimate functioning. In Thomas

M. A.

(Ed.), Hey, don't forget about me: Education's investment in the severely, profoundly and multiply handicapped (pp. 2–15). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

Certo

(1983). Characteristics of educational services. In Snell

M. E.

(Ed.), Systematic instruction of the moderately and severely handicapped (2nd ed., pp. 2–15). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

Horner

R. H.

Sprague

Wilcox

(1982). General case programming for community activities. In Wilcox

Bellamy

G. T.

, Design of high school programs for severely handicapped students (pp. 61–98). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Liberty

K. A.

(1985). Enhancing instruction for maintenance, generalization, and adaptation. In Lakin

K. C.

Bruininks

R. H.

(Eds.). Strategies for Achieving Community Integration of Developmentally Disabled Citizens. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Mager

R. F.

(1975) Preparing instructional objectives. Belmont, CA: Fearon.

Neel

R. S.

Billingsley

F. F.

(1981). Instruction for autistic children: Some critical problems and possible solutions. In Rutherford

R. B.

Prieto

A. G.

(Eds.), Monograph in behavior disorders: Severe behavior disorders of children and youth (Series No. 4, pp. 78–88). Reston, VA: Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders.

Ryan

Johnson

Lynch

(1977). So you want to write objectives (or have to). In Haring

N. G.

(Ed.), The experimental education training program: An inservice program for personnel serving the severely handicapped (Vol. 1, pp. 37–44). Seattle: University of Washington.

Sailor

Guess

(1983). Severely handicapped students: An instructional design. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

10.

Snell

M. E.

(Ed.). (1983). Systematic instruction of the moderately and severely handicapped (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.

11.

Stokes

T. F.

Baer

D. M.

(1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.

12.

Streifel

Cadez

M. J.

(1983). Serving children and adolescents with developmental disabilities in the special education classroom: Proven methods. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

13.

Van Etten

Arkell

Van Etten

(1980). The severely and profoundly handicapped: Programs, methods and materials. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.

14.

Whitney

Streifel

(1981). Functionality and generalization in training the severely and profoundly handicapped. Journal of Special Education Technology, 4(3), 33–39.

15.

Wilcox

Bellamy

G. T.

(1982). Design of high school programs for severely handicapped students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.