Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of a microcomputer-operated video-game format in training nonvocal students with severe physical handicaps to make scan and selection responses similar to those needed for operating linear scanning augmentative communication aids. The video scanning and selection game systematically shaped scanning on more complex screens by slowly increasing the number of boxes presented simultaneously on the screen (i.e., from one to three boxes). Three children participated in a multiple probe across-subjects design to evaluate the effectiveness of the video game. Results indicated that all three children showed substantial increases in the number of correct scan and selection responses made at all three levels of difficulty. Generalization data indicated that all three children were able to transfer use of the skill to a Zygo 100 communication device. Maintenance of the effects also was demonstrated.

Keywords

adaptations multiple handicaps nonvocal communication physical disabilities special education speech therapy/pathology symbol systems

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dunn

(1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

Fishman

(1987). Electronic communication aids: Selection and use. Boston: College Hill.

Hamlett

Hasselbring

T.S.

(1985). Omnibox (Computer program). Nashville, TN: Expert Systems Software, Inc.¹.

Hamlett

Horn

(1987). The Scanning Game (Computer program). Nashville, TN: Peabody College of Vanderbilt University.².

Harris

Vanderheiden

(1980). Enhancing the development of communication interaction. In Schiefelbusch

R. L.

(Ed.), Nonspeech language and communication: Analysis and intervention (pp. 227–257). Baltimore: University Park Press.

Hasselbring

Hamlett

Hooper

(1984). An investigation of the feasibility of a microcomputer system for developing scanning and selection skills in severely handicapped children. Unpublished manuscript reporting on the progress of a Spencer Grant.

Horner

R. H.

Baer

D. M.

(1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196.

Leiter

R. G.

(1948). Leiter International Performance Scale. Chicago: Stoelting.

Lent

J. R.

McLean

B. M.

(1976). The trainable retarded: The technology of teaching. In Haring

N. G.

Schiefelbusch

R. L.

(Eds.), Teaching special children (pp. 197–231). New York: McGraw-Hill.

10.

Malone

T. W.

(1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333–369.

11.

Piche

Reichle

(1991). Teaching scanning selection techniques. In Reichle

York

Sigafoos

(Eds.), Implementing augmentative and alternative communication strategies for learners with severe disabilities (pp 257–274). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

12.

Vanderheiden

G. C.

(1977). Providing a child with a means to communicate. In Vanderheiden

Grilley

(Eds.), Nonvocal communication techniques and aids for the severely physically handicapped (pp 20–76). Baltimore: University Park Press.

13.

Vanderheiden

G. C.

(1984). High and low technology approaches in the development of communication systems for severely physically handicapped persons. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 4(4), 40–56.

14.

Vanderheiden

G. C.

Lloyd

L. L.

(1986). Communication systems and their components. In Blackstone

S. W.

Bruskin

D. M.

(Eds.), Augmentative communication: An introduction (pp 49–162). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.

15.

Vulpé

S. G.

(1977). Vulpé Assessment Battery. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.

An Investigation of the Feasibility of a Video Game System for Developing Scanning and Selection Skills

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References