This article presents information on instructional strategies and the effective use of personnel needed for educating students with dual sensory impairments in integrated learning environments. To counter the practice of educating students in separate environments according to their most apparent weaknesses and limitations, the authors contend that learners with dual sensory impairments can benefit from shared learning environments (cross-categorical) and from daily interactions with nondisabled peers. Specific examples and practical intervention strategies to accommodate for the sensory losses are provided.
BaumgartD.BrownL.PumpianI.NisbetJ.FordA.SweetM.MessinaR.SchroederJ. (1982). Principle of partial participation and individualized adaptations in educational programs for severely handicapped students. Journal of The Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7(2), 17–27.
2.
BaumgartD.Van WalleghemJ. (1986). Staffing strategies for implementing community-based instruction. Journal for The Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11, 92–101.
3.
BourlandG.JablonskiE.LockhartD. (1988). Multiple-behavior comparison of group and individual instruction of persons with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 26(1), 39–46.
4.
BrinkerR. P. (1985). Interactions between severely mentally retarded students and other students in integrated and segregated public school settings. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 587–594.
5.
BrownL.NietupskiJ.Hamre-NietupskiS. (1976). The criterion of ultimate functioning and public school services for severely handicapped students. In ThomasM. A. (Ed.), Hey, don't forget about me! Education's investment in the severely and profoundly handicapped (pp. 2–15). Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
6.
CalculatorS. (1988). Promoting the acquisition and generalization of conversational skills by individuals with severe disabilities. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 4(2), 94–103.
7.
CertoN.KohlF. L. (1984). A strategy for developing interpersonal interaction instructional content for severely handicapped students. In CertoN.HaringN.YorkR. (Eds.), Public school integration of severely handicapped students: Rational issues and progressive alternatives (pp. 221–244). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
8.
DowningJ.BaileyB. (1990). Developing vision use within functional daily activities for students with visual and multiple disabilities. RE:view.21, 209–220.
9.
EichingerJ. (1990). Effects of goal structure on social interaction between elementary level nondisabled students and students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 56, 408–417.
10.
FordA.DavernL. (1989). Moving forward with school integration: Strategies for involving students with severe handicaps in the life of the school. In Gaylord-RossR. (Ed.), Integration strategies for students with handicaps (pp. 11–31). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
11.
FordA.DempseyP.BlackJ.DavernL.SchnorrR.MeyerL., (Eds.) (1986). The Syracuse community-referenced curriculum guide for students with moderate and severe handicaps.Syracuse, NY: Syracuse City School District.
12.
FordA.MirendaP. (1984). Community instruction: A natural cues and corrections decision model. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 79–87.
13.
FoxW.ThousandJ.WilliamsW.FoxT.TowneP.ReidR.Conn-PowersC.CalcagniL. (1986). Best educational practices 1986: Educating learners with severe handicaps.Burlington: University of Vermont, Center for Developmental Disabilities.
14.
FoxxR. M. (1981). Effective behavioral programming: Graduated guidance and backward chaining.Champaign, IL: Research Press.
15.
FredericksH. D.BaldwinV. (1987). Individuals with sensory impairments: Who are they? How are they educated? In GoetzL.GuessD.Stremel-CampbellK. (Eds.), Innovative program design for individuals with dual sensory impairments, (pp 3–14). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
16.
HolowachK. (1987). Teaching that works: The individualized critical skills model.Oakland, CA: Special Education Resource Network (SERN).
17.
HornerR. H.BellamyG. T.ColvinG. T. (1984). Responding in the presence of nontrained stimuli: Implications of generalization error patterns. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 287–295.
18.
ItardJ. M. G. (1862). The wild boy of Aveyron.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
19.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1987). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1989). Cooperative learning and mainstreaming. In Gaylord-RossR. (Ed.), Integration strategies for students with handicaps (pp. 233–248). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
21.
LunderwoldD.LewinL.IrwinL. (1987). Rehabilitation of visual impairments: A critical review. Clinical Psychology, 7, 169–185.
22.
McInnesJ. M.TreffryJ. A. (1982). Deaf-blind infants and children: A developmental guide.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
23.
MeyerL.EichingerJ. (1987). Program evaluation in support of program development: Needs, strategies and future directions. In GoetzL.GuessD.Stremel-CampbellK., (Eds.), Innovative program design for individuals with dual sensory impairments (pp. 313–353). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
24.
MeyerL.EichingerJ.Park-LeeS. (1987). A validation of program indicators in educational services for students with severe disabilities. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 251–263.
25.
MeyerL. M.KishiG. S. (1985). School integration strategies. In LakinC.BruininksJ. R. (Eds.), Strategies for achieving community integration of developmentally disabled citizens (pp. 231–252). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
26.
OreloveF.SobseyD. (1987). Educating children with multiple disabilities: A transdisciplinary approach.Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
27.
PutnamJ. W.RyndersJ. E.JohnsonR. T.JohnsonD. W. (1989). Collaborative skill instruction for promoting positive interactions between mentally handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Exceptional Children, 55(6), 550–557.
28.
ReidD.FavellJ. (1984). Group instruction with persons who have severe disabilities: A critical review. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 167–177.
29.
RikhyeC.GothelfC.AppellM. (1989). A classroom environment checklist for students with dual sensory impairments. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22(1), 44–47.
30.
RowlandC.SchweigenP. (1989). Tangible symbols: Symbolic communication for individuals with multisensory impairments. Augmentative & Alternative Communication.226–234.
31.
SassoG.RudeH. (1988). The social effects of integration on nonhandicapped children. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 23(1), 18–23.
32.
SmithdasR. (1981). Psychological aspects of deaf-blindness. In WalshS.HolzbergR. (Eds.), Understanding and educating the deaf-blind/severely and profoundly handicapped (pp. 38–42). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
33.
SnellM.ZirpoliT. (1987). Intervention strategies. In SnellM. (Ed.), Systematic instruction of persons with severe handicaps (3rd ed.) (pp. 110–149). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
34.
StainbackS.StainbackW. (1985). Integrating students with severe handicaps into regular schools.Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
35.
StainbackW.StainbackS. (1987). Facilitating friendships. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 22(1), 18–25.
36.
StrullyJ.StrullyC. (1985). Friendship and our children. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 224–227.
37.
UsiltonR.FillerJ. (1988). Training module: Heterogeneous groupings.San Francisco: California Research Institute, San Francisco State University.
38.
Van DijkJ. (1985). An educational curriculum for deaf-blind multi-handicapped persons. In EllisD. (Ed.), Sensory impairments in mentally handicapped people (pp. 374–382). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
39.
VoeltzL. (1980). Children's attitudes toward handicapped peers. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84(5), 455–464.
40.
VoeltzL. (1982). Effects of structured interactions with severely handicapped peers on children's attitudes. American Journal on Mental Deficiency, 86, 180–190.
41.
YorkJ. (1984). A transdisciplinary model of service delivery for educational teams who serve students with severe and multiple handicaps: Implications for developmental therapists. Unpublished manuscript. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
42.
ZieglerS.HambletonD. (1976). Integration of young TMR children into regular elementary school. Exceptional Children, 42(8), 459–461.
