The status of extended school year (ESY) services was assessed through a national survey of the chapters of the National Society for Children and Adults with Autism (NSAC). The results of the 66 NSAC chapters that responded were compared with previous research that surveyed state and local education agencies about ESY implementation. Although the availability of ESY programs appears to be increasing, public officials and consumers differ in their perceptions of the methods and criteria employed by states to implement ESY services. Differences among states were evident with regard to the operationalization of various aspects of ESY such as eligibility criteria and length of programs.
AlperS.NoieD. R. (1987). Extended school year services for students with severe handicaps: A national survey. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 61–66.
2.
Armstrong v. Kline, 476 F. Supp. 583 (E.D. Pa. 1979).
3.
Battle v. Commonwealth, 79–2158, 79-2188-90, 79-2568-70 (3rd Cir., July 18, 1980).
4.
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 102 S. Ct. 3034 (1982).
5.
Georgia Association of Retarded Citizens v. McDaniel, 511 F. Supp. 1263 (N.D. Georgia, 1981).
6.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (1983). Extended Year Services. Washington, DC: Author.
7.
ScotlandJ. F.MancusoE. (1981). U.S. Court of Appeals decision regarding Armstrong v. Kline: The 180 day rule. Journal of Exceptional Children, 4, 266–270.
8.
WeintraubF.AbesonA.BallardJ.LavorM. (Eds.). (1976). Public Policy and the Education of Exceptional Children. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
9.
Yaris et al. v. Special School District of St. Louis County et al., 84–423C (2) (E.D. Missouri, 1983).
