A majority of states are engaged in the process of establishing community-based employment programs for persons with severe disabilities. The application of benefit-cost procedures frequently has been suggested as a method of comparing or evaluating alternative approaches. This article provides an overview of benefit-cost analysis and its limitations, and reviews the applications of benefit-cost analysis within vocational programs for persons with disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abt Associates (1976). The program services and support system of the rehabilitation services administration.Cambridge, MS: Author.
2.
BerkowitzM.EnglanderV.RubinJ.WorrallJ. D. (1975). An evaluation of policy-related rehabilitation research.New York: Praeger.
3.
BraddockD.HempR.HowesR. (1985). Public expenditures for mental retardation and developmental disabilities in the United States. [Monograph]. Expenditure Analysis Project, Evaluation and Public Policy Program, Institute for the Study of Developmental Disabilities.Chicago: University of Illinois.
4.
BuckleyJ.BellamyG. T. (1986). Day and vocational programs for adults with severe disabilities: A 1984 profile. In FergusonP. (Ed.), Issues in transition research: Economic and social outcomes (pp. 1–12) Eugene: Specialized Training Program, Center on Human Development, University of Oregon.
5.
ChoD. W. (1980). An economic evaluation of the Japanese model factory employment and handicapped persons. Unpublished manuscript, Wichita State University.
6.
ChoD. W.SchuermannA. C. (1980). Economic costs and benefits of private gainful employment of the severely handicapped. Journal of Rehabilitation46(3), 28–32.
7.
ConleyR. W. (1975). Benefit-cost analysis and vocational rehabilitation. In WeisingerM.RobinaultI. P.BennettE. C. (Eds.), Program evaluation: Selected readings (pp. 77–81) New York: ICD Rehabilitation and Research Center.
8.
GoodallP.HillM.HillJ. (1980). Parental perceptions of employment for severely disabled individuals: A 12-month assessment. In WehmanP.HillM. (Eds.), Vocational training and placement of severely disabled persons project employability - Volume 2 (pp. 96–103) Richmond: Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, Virginia Commonwealth University.
9.
HardinE. (1969). Benefit-cost analyses of occupational training programs: A comparison of recent studies. In SomersG.WoodsW. D. (Eds.), Cost-benefit analysis of manpower policies (pp. 97–118) Kingston, Ontario: Industrial Relations Centre, Queens University.
10.
HardinE.BorusM. (1971). The economic benefits and costs of retraining.Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
11.
HillM. L. (1986). Outline and support materials to assist in the preparation of proposals to provide time-limited and ongoing services within a program of supported employment. Unpublished manuscript, Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
12.
HillM.BanksP. D.HandrichR.WehmanP.HillJ.ShaferM. (in press). Benefit-cost analysis of supported employment for persons with mental retardation. Research in developmental disabilities.
13.
HillM.WehmanP. (1983). Cost benefit analysis of placing moderately and severely handicapped individuals into competitive employment. Journal of The Association of the Severely Handicapped8, 30–32.
14.
IngeK. J.BanksP. D.WehmanP.HillJ. W.ShaferM. (1987). Quality of life for individuals who are labeled mentally retarded: Evaluating competitive employment versus sheltered workshop employment.Richmond: Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, Virginia Commonwealth University.
15.
KiernanW.StarkJ. (1986). Pathways to employment for developmentally disabled adults.Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
16.
LamC. S. (1986, December). Comparison of sheltered and supported work programs: A pilot study. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, pp. 66–82.
17.
LandesmanS. (1986). Quality of life and personal life satisfaction: Definition and measurement issues. Mental Retardation24(3), 141–143.
18.
LevitanS.TaggartR. (1982). Rehabilitation, employment, and the disabled. In RubinJ. (Ed.), Alternatives in rehabilitating the handicapped: A policy analysis (pp. 89–149) New York: Human Sciences Press.
19.
MatsonJ. L.RuschF. R. (1986). Quality of life: Does competitive employment make a difference? In RuschF. R. (Ed.), Competitive employment issues and strategies (pp. 331–337) Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
20.
MergetA. (1981). Fiscal dependency of cities. Public budgeting and finance1(2), 20–30.
21.
MoranR. T. (1981). A client level benefit/cost analysis of vocational rehabilitation.Salem: Oregon Vocational Rehabilitation Division.
22.
NayJ.ScanlonJ.WholeyJ. (1971). Benefits and costs of manpower training programs: A synthesis of previous studies with reservations and recommendations.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
23.
NobleJ. H.Jr. (1977). The limits of cost-benefit analysis as a guide to priority-setting in rehabilitation. Evaluation Quarterly1(3), 347–379.
24.
NobleJ. H.ConleyR. W. (1987). Accumulating evidence on the benefits and costs of supported and transitional employment for persons with severe disabilities. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps12(3), 163–174.
25.
NobleJ. H.ConleyR. W.ElderJ. K. (1986). Where do we go from here? In KiernanW.StarkJ. (Eds.), Pathways to employment for adults with developmental disabilities (pp. 85–102) Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
26.
RhodesL. (1982). Alternative investment analysis of services for severely handicapped people. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
27.
RhodesL.RamsingK.ValentaL. (1986, November). An economic evaluation of supported employment within one manufacturing company. Paper presented at the 1986 TASH Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA.
28.
RubinJ. (1982). Alternatives in rehabilitating the handicapped: A policy analysis.New York: Human Sciences Press.
29.
RuschF. R. (1986). Competitive employment issues and strategies.Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
30.
SchneiderK.MartinJ.RuschF. (1981, November). Cost versus benefits between sheltered and nonsheltered vocational training programs: Are we sacrificing quality?Counterpoint, pp. 1–28.
31.
SchneiderK.RuschF.HendersonR.GerskeT. (1982). Competitive employment for mentally retarded persons: Costs versus benefits. In HalloranW. (Ed.), Funding and costs analysis (Policy paper series: Document 8) (pp. 2–16). Urbana-Champaign, IL: Leadership Training Institute, Vocational and Special Education.
32.
StokeyE.ZeckhauserR. (1978). A primer for policy analysis.New York: Norton.
33.
ThompsonM. S. (1980). Benefit-cost analysis for program evaluation.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
34.
ThorntonC. (1984). Benefit-cost analysis of social programs: The case of deinstitutionalization and education programs. In BruininksR. (Ed.), Living and learning in the least restrictive environment (pp. 225–243) Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
35.
WehmanP. (1981). Competitive employment: New horizons for severely disabled individuals.Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
36.
WehmanP.HillM.KregelJ.BanksP. D.MoonM. S. (in press). Sheltered versus supported work programs: A second look.Richmond: Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, Virginia Commonwealth University.
37.
WillM. C. (1984). Supported employment services: An USERS position paper.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
