Sets of augmentative decision rules used to determine a learner's candidacy for an augmentative communication system were reviewed and critiqued. Particular scrutiny was given to criteria addressing certain cognitive acquisitions and the identification of a significant communication deficit(s) as prerequisites to system implementation. A case is presented to support the use of an augmentative communication system as a preventive treatment and a potential facilitator of language comprehension skills. An alternative approach to traditional decision rules that involves the implementation of procedures that allow the simultaneous scrutiny of graphic (communication board), gestural (sign), and vocal communicative modes is proposed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertoP.GarrettE.BriggsT.UmbergerF. (1983, March). Selection and initiation of a nonvocal communication program for severely handicapped students. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15(7), 1–15.
2.
AlpertC. (1980). Procedures for determining the optional nonspeech mode with the autistic child. In SchiefelbuschR. (Ed.), Nonspeech language and communication: Analysis and intervention (pp. 389–420). Baltimore: University Park Press.
3.
BaerD.PetersonR.ShermanJ. (1967). The development of imitation by reinforcing behavioral similarity to a model. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 405–416.
4.
BatesE.BenigniL.BrethetonI.CamioniL.VolterraV. (1976). From gesture to first word: On cognitive and social prerequisites. In LewisM.RosenblomL. (Eds.), Origins of behavior: Language and communication (pp. 247–308). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
BatesE.BenigniL.BrethetonI.CamioniL.VolterraV. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.
6.
BloomL. (1970). Language development: Form and function of emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
BrickerW.BrickerD. (1974). An early language training strategy. In SchiefelbuschR.LloydL. (Eds.), Language perspectives—Acquisition, retardation, and intervention (pp. 431–468). Baltimore: University Park Press.
8.
CarterA. (1973, March). Development of a presyntactic communication system: A case study. Paper presented at SRCD meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
9.
ChapmanR. (1978). Comprehension strategies in children. In CavanaughJ.StrangeW. (Eds.), Speech and language in the laboratory school and clinic. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
ChapmanR.MillerJ. (1980). Analyzing language and communication in the child. In SchiefelbuschR. C. (Ed.), Nonspeech language and communication: Acquisition and intervention (pp. 159–196). Baltimore: University Park Press.
11.
CorriganR. (1976, April). The relationship between object permanence and language development: How much and how strong? Paper presented at the Stanford Child Language Research Forum, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
12.
DaniloffJ.NollJ.FristoeM.LloydL. (1982). Gesture recognition in patients with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 43–49.
13.
FulwilerR.FoutsR. (1976). Acquisition of American Sign Language by a noncommunicating autistic child. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 6, 43–51.
14.
GarciaE.BaerD.FirestoneI. (1971). The development of generalized imitation within experimentally determined boundaries. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 101–112.
15.
GuessD.SailorW.BaerD. (1978). Children with limited language. In SchiefelbuschR. L. (Ed.), Language intervention strategies, (pp. 101–143). Baltimore: University Park Press.
16.
HardingC.GolinkoffR. (1979). The origins of intentional vocalizations in prelinguistic infants. Child Development, 50, 33–40.
17.
IllmerS.RyndersJ.SinclairS.HelfrichD. (1981). Assessment of object permanence in severely handicapped students as a function of motor and prompting variables. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6(3), 30–40.
18.
IngramD. (1974, April). Stages in the development of one-word utterances. Paper presented at the Stanford Child Language Research Forum, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
19.
KahnJ. (1975). Relationship of Piaget's sensorimotor period to language acquisition of profoundly retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, 640–643.
20.
KarlanG. R.LloydL. L. (1983, June). Examination of recall comprehension learning by moderately retarded individuals responding to oral and manual cues. Paper presented at the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, Dallas, TX.
21.
KarlanG.LloydL. (1985). Unpublished manuscript. Department of Special Education, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
22.
KentL. (1974). Language acquisition program for the severely retarded. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
23.
KeoghW.ReichleJ. (1985). Communication interventional for the “Difficult-to-teach” severely handicapped. In WarrenS.Rogers-WarrenA. (Eds)., Teaching functional language. (pp 157–196). Baltimore: University Park Press.
24.
KiernanC. C. (1981). A strategy for research on the use of nonvocal systems of communication. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities. 11, 139–151.
25.
KohlF.KarlanG.HealL. (1979). Effects of pairing manual signs with verbal cues upon the acquisition of instruction-following behaviors and the generalization to expressive language with severely handicapped children. AAESPH Review, 4, 291–103.
26.
KonstantaneasM.OxmanJ.WebsterC. (1978). Iconicity: Effects of the acquisition of sign language by autistic and other severely dysfunctional children. In SipleP. (Ed.), Understanding language through sign language research (pp. 213–237). New York: Academic Press.
27.
LovaasO.BerberichJ.PerloffB.SchaefferB. (1966). Acquisition of imitative speech by schizophrenic children. Science, 151. 705–707.
28.
McIntireM. (1974). A modified model for the description of language acquisition in a deaf child. Unpublished master's thesis, California State University, Northridge, CA.
29.
MillerJ.ChapmanR.BranstonM.ReichleJ. (1980). Communicative assessment in twelve (12) to twenty-four (24) months: A reliable method. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 284–311.
30.
MooreM.ClarkD.MailM.RajotteP.Stoel-GammonC. (1977, March). The relationship between language and object permanance development: A study of Down's infants and children. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA.
31.
NietupskiJ.Hamre-NietupskiS. (1979). Teaching auxiliary communication skills to severely handicapped learners. AAESPH Review, 4, 107–124.
32.
OwensR.HouseL. (1984). Decision-making processes in augmentative communication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 18–25.
33.
ReichleJ. (1984). Using response prompts to teach early communication skills to severely handicapped learners. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
34.
ReichleJ.McQuarterR.RogersN. (1983). Sign intervention with severely handicapped learners: A review. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
35.
ReichleJ.YoderD. (in press). Teaching severely handicapped learners operating in sensorimotor stage 4 to use communication boards. Language. Speech and Hearing Services in Schools.
36.
RemingtonN.ClarkS. (1983). The acquisition of expressive signing by autistic children: An evaluation of the relative effects of simultaneous communication and sign above training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 315–328.
37.
RiceM. (1983). Contemporary accounts of the cognition/language relationship: Implications for speech-language clinicians. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48, 347–359.
38.
RogersS. (1977). Characteristics of the cognitive development of profoundly retarded children. Child Development, 48, 837–843.
39.
SailorW.GuessD.GoetzL.SchulerA.UtleyB.BaldwinM. (1980). Language and severely handicapped persons: Deciding what to teach whom. In SailorW.WilcoxB.BrownL. (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students (pp. 71–108). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
40.
ScheuermanN.BaumgartD.SimpsaK.BrownL. (1976). Toward the development of a curriculum for teaching nonverbal communication skills to severely handicapped students: Teaching basic tracking, scanning and selection skills. In BrownL.ScheuermanN.CrownerT. (Eds.), Madison's alternative for zero exclusion: Toward an integrated therapy model for leaching motor, tracking and scanning skills to severely handicapped students (Vol. 6, Pt. 3). Madison, WI: Madison Metropolitan School District.
41.
ShaneH. (1980). Approaches to assessing the communication of nonoral persons. In SchiefelbuschR. L. (Ed.), Nonspeech language and communication: Analysis and intervention, (pp. 197–224). Baltimore: University Park Press.
42.
ShaneH.BashirA. (1980). Election criteria for the adoption of an augmentative communication system: Preliminary considerations. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 5, 408–414.
43.
StillmanR.AylmerJ.VandivortJ. (1983, June). The functions of signaling behaviors in profoundly-impaired, deaf-blind children and adolescents. Paper presented at the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, Dallas, TX.
44.
StriefelS.WetherbyB. (1974). Instruction following behavior of a retarded child and its controlling stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 417–430.
45.
StriefelS.WetherbyB.KarlanG. (1976). Establishing generalized verb-noun instruction-following skills in retarded children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 247–260.
