Two adolescents with severe disabilities were taught pictorial communication skills using an interrupted behavior sequence strategy. The independent variable involved insertion of a typical operant instructional trial for teaching communication skills into the midst of ongoing predictable sequences of behaviors, such as making toast or washing dishes, rather than at the beginning of the task performance. Results indicated the strategy was effective, and are discussed in terms of motivational factors and in terms of potential application of the strategy in community settings.
BaumgartD.BrownL.PumpianI.NisbetJ.FordA.SweetM.MessinaR.SchroederJ. (1982). Principle of partial participation and individualized adaptations in educational programs for severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7(2), 17–27.
2.
DunlapG. (1981). The influence of task variation and maintenance tasks on learning and motivation by autistic children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Santa Barbara.
3.
FordA.MirendaP. (1984). Community instruction: A natural cues and corrections decision model. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9(2), 79–87.
4.
GoetzL. (1981). Effects of functional object use on acquisition of receptive labeling skills: An experimental analysis of semantic development in severely handicapped learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley and San Francisco State University.
5.
GoetzL.SchulerA.SailorW. (1981). Functional competence as a factor in communication instruction. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 2, 51–60.
6.
GoetzL.SchulerA.SailorW. (1983). Motivational considerations in teaching language to students with severe handicaps. In HersenM.Van HasseltV.MatsonJ. (Eds.), Behavior therapy for the developmentally and physically disabled (pp. 57–77). New York: Academic Press.
7.
HallG.SundbergM.StaffordM. (1979). Teaching a mand repertoire to deaf individuals: Transfer of stimulus control from imitative or tact variables to the establishing operation. Paper presented at the 5th Annual Association for Behavior Analysis Conference, Dearborn, MI.
8.
HolvoetJ.GuessD.MulliganM.BrownF. (1980). The individualized curriculum sequencing model (II): A teaching strategy for severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 5(4), 337–351.
9.
HornerR.MeyerL.FredericksH. D., (Eds.), (in press). Education of learners with severe handicaps: Exemplary service strategies. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
10.
JanssenCGuessD. (1978). Use of function as a consequence in training receptive labeling to severely and profoundly retarded individuals. AAESPH Review, 3, 246–258.
11.
KoegelR.WilliamsJ. (1980). Direct vs. indirect response-reinforcer relationships in teaching autistic children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 537–547.
12.
LittM.SchreibmanL. (1982). Stimulus specific reinforcement in the acquisition of receptive labels by autistic children. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1, 171–186.
13.
MulliganM.LacyL.GuessD. (1982). Effects of massed, distributed, and spaced trial sequencing on severely handicapped students' performanceJournal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7(2), 48–61.
14.
SailorW.HalvorsenA.AndersonJ.GoetzL.GeeK.DoeringK.HuntP. (in press). Community intensive instruction. In HornerR.MeyerL.FredericksH. D. (Eds.), Education of learners with severe handicaps. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
15.
SaundersR.SailorW. (1979). A comparison of three strategies of reinforcement on two-choice learning problems with severely retarded children. AAESPH Review, 4, 323–333.
16.
SchulerA. L.GoetzL. (1981). The assessment of severe language disabilities: Communicative and cognitive considerations. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1, 333–346.
17.
SchulerA. L.PeckCTomlinsonC.TheimerR. K. (1984). Assessment: the communication interview. In PeckC.SchulerA.TomlinsonC.TheimerR. K.HaringT.SemmelM. (Eds.), The Social Competence Curriculum Project (pp. 22–106). Graduate School of Education, University of California at Santa Barbara.
18.
SnellM. (1983). Systematic instruction of the moderately and severely handicapped (2nd ed.). Columbus, Ohio: Chas. E. Merrill.
19.
StaffordM.SundbergM.BraamS. (1978). An experimental analysis of mands and tacts. Paper presented at the fourth annual conference, Midwest Association of Behavior Analysis, Chicago, Ill.
