Seventy-five literacy activities of eight middle and high school students with severe disabilities were analyzed in terms of the literacy content, materials used, student engagement, and contexts, including location and instructional arrangement. Coded observations, review of teaching materials, and follow-up teacher interviews and questionnaires revealed that students spent a disproportionate amount of time passively engaged in reading activities (i.e., listening without the opportunity to respond) in one-to-one instructional arrangements located in self-contained classes. Active engagement in written and spoken expressive communication was underemphasized. Worksheets and picture symbols were the most often-used materials. Activities rarely occurred in the natural setting for use of the literacy skill, or with the materials that would be used under natural circumstances. Findings are discussed in relationship to research-based practices.
AgranM. (2011). Promoting literacy instruction for people with severe disabilities: Achieving and realizing a literate identity. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36, 3–4. doi:10.2511/027494811800824561
2.
AllorJ. H.ChamplinT. M.GiffordD. B.MathesP. G. (2010). Methods for increasing the intensity of reading instruction for students with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 500–511.
3.
BouckE. C. (2009). No Child Left Behind, the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act and functional curricula: A conflict of interest?Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 44, 3–13.
4.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 72, 195–207. doi:10.1177/001440290507100205
5.
BrowderD. M.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.CourtadeG.GibbsS. L.FlowersC. (2008). Evaluation of the effectiveness of an early literacy program for students with significant developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 33–52. doi:10.1177/001440290807500102
6.
BrowderD. M.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.SpoonerF.MimsP. J.BakerJ. N. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343–364. doi:10.1177/001440290907500305
7.
BrowderD. M.GibbsS.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.CourtadeG. R.MrazM.FlowersC. (2009). Literacy for students with severe developmental disabilities: What should we teach and what should we hope to achieve?Remedial and Special Education, 30, 269–282.
8.
BrowderD. M.TrelaK.JimenezB. (2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 206–219. doi:10.1177/10883576070220040301
9.
BrowderD. M.WakemanS. Y.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.AlgozzineB. (2006). Research on reading instruction for students with severe cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408. doi:10.1177/10883576070220040301
10.
BrownL.NietupskiJ.Hamre-NietupskiS. (1976). The criterion of ultimate functioning and public school services for severely handicapped students. In ThomasM. A. (Ed.), Hey, don’t forget about me!: Education’s investment in the severely, profoundly, and multiply handicapped (pp. 2–15). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
11.
Causton-TheoharisJ.TheoharisG.OrsatiF.CosierM. (2011). Does self-contained special education deliver on its promises? A critical inquiry into research and practice. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 24, 61–78.
ClarkC. M.PetersonP. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255–296). New York, NY: Macmillan.
14.
CopelandS. R. (2007). The power of literacy. In CopelandS. R.KeefeE. B. (Eds.), Effective literacy instruction for students with moderate or severe disabilities (pp. 1–6). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
15.
CopelandS. R.KeefeE. B. (2007). Literacy for life. In CopelandS. R.KeefeE. B. (Eds.), Effective literacy instruction for students with moderate or severe disabilities (pp. 157–165). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
16.
CopelandS. R.KeefeE. B.CalhoonA. J.TannerW.ParkS. (2011). Preparing teachers to provide literacy instruction to all students: Faculty experiences and perceptions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36, 126–141. doi:10.2511/027494811800824499
17.
CroninD. (2000). Click, clack, moo: Cows that type. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
18.
CroningerR. G.ValliL. (2009). “Where is the action?” Challenges to studying the teaching of reading in elementary classrooms. Educational Researcher, 38, 100–108. doi:10.3102/0013189X09333206
19.
DessemontetR. S.BlessG.MorinD. (2012). Effects of inclusion on the academic achievement and adaptive behavior of children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 579–587.
20.
DeWaltK. M.DeWaltB. R. (2011). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: AltaMira.
21.
DowningJ. E. (2005). Teaching literacy to students with severe disabilities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
22.
DymondS. K.NeeperL. S.FonesD. (2010). Typing with purpose: Linking the word processing curriculum to real world applications through service learning. The Clearing House, 83, 33–38. doi:10.1080/00098650903505480
23.
EricksonK. A.ClendonS. A. (2009). Addressing the literacy demands of the curriculum for beginning readers and writers. In SotoG.ZangariC. (Eds.), Practically speaking: Language, literacy, and academic development for students with AAC needs (pp. 195–215). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
24.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004) (reauthorization of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 1990).
25.
JohnsonJ. W.McDonnellJ.HolzwarthV. N.HunterK. (2004). The efficacy of embedded instruction for students with developmental disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 214–227. doi:10.1177/10983007040060040301
26.
KeefeE. B.CopelandS. R. (2011). What is literacy? The power of a definition. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36, 92–99. doi:10.2511/027494811800824507
27.
KlingnerJ. K.UrbachJ.GolosG.BrownellM.MenonS. (2010). Teaching reading in the 21st century: A glimpse at how special education teachers promote reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 59–74.
28.
KoppenhaverD. A.YoderD. E. (1993). Classroom literacy instruction for children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI): What it is and what it might be. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 1–15. doi:10.1097/00011363-199302000-00003
29.
McKenzieA. R. (2009). Emergent literacy supports for students who are deaf-blind or have visual and multiple impairments: A multiple-case study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103, 291–302.
30.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
MimsP.LeeA.BrowderD. M.ZakasT. L.FlynnS. (2012). Effects of a treatment package to facilitate English/language arts learning for middle school students with moderate to severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 414–425.
32.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Pub. No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
33.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
34.
RupparA. L.DymondS. K.GaffneyJ. S. (2011). Teachers’ perspectives on literacy instruction for students with severe disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36, 100–111. doi:10.2511/027494811800824435
35.
RupparA. L.GaffneyJ. S.DymondS. K. (in press). Influences on teachers’ decisions about literacy for secondary students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children.
36.
RupparA. L.RobertsC. A.OlsonA. J. (2014). Faculty perceptions of expertise among teachers of students with severe disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0888406414552331
37.
RyndakD. L.MorrisonA. P.SommersteinL. (1999). Literacy before and after inclusion in general education settings: A case study. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 5–22. doi:10.2511/rpsd.24.1.5
38.
RyndakD. L.TaubD.JorgensenC.Gonsier-GerdinJ.RupparA. L.ArndtK.. . .AllcockH. (2014). Policy and the impact on placement, involvement, and progress in general education: Critical issues that require rectification. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 65–74. doi:10.1177/1540796914533942
39.
SnellM. E.ChenL. Y.HooverK. (2006). Teaching augmentative and alternative communication to students with severe disabilities: A review of intervention research, 1997-2003. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 203–214.
40.
SpoonerF.DymondS. K.SmithA.KennedyC. (2006). What we know and need to know about accessing the general curriculum for students with severe cognitive disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 277–283.
41.
SturmJ. M.ClendonS. A. (2004). Augmentative and alternative communication, language, and literacy: Fostering the relationship. Topics in Language Disorders, 24, 76–91. doi:10.1097/00011363-200401000-00008
42.
SwansonE. A.VaughnS. (2010). An observation study of reading instruction provided to elementary students with learning disabilities in the resource room. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 481–492. doi:10.1002/pits.20484
43.
WestlingD. L.FoxL. (2008). Teaching students with severe disabilities (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
