Drawing on information collected through site visits and phone interviews, the author describes strategies used by states, school districts, and schools to integrate students with severe disabilities in normal school and community settings. The article presents strategies addressing a broad range of administrative, planning, programmatic, logistical, and attitudinal issues. The author concludes that commitment is the key to the success of integration efforts.
WilliamsW.FoxT. (Eds.). Minimum objective system for pupils with severe handicaps. Burlington, VT: Center for Developmental Disabilities, University of Vermont, 1977.
2.
Special Education Resource Center.Special populations: Compendium of practices. Syracuse, NY: Special Education Resource Center, Syracuse University, 1982.
3.
NietupskiJ.Hamre-NietupskiS.SchuetzG.OckwoodL.Severely handicapped students in regular schools: A progress report: Milwaukee Public Schools integration efforts. Milwaukee: Milwaukee Public Schools, 1980.
4.
StetsonF. E.EltingS. E.GibbsL. K.RaimondiS. L.BurnetteJ.ScheffterA.Options: A training program to present administrative options for implementing the least restrictive environment (LRE) mandate. Annandale, VA: JWK International Corporation, 1981.
5.
RitchieD. S.GruenewaldL. J.SchroederJ.Integration of moderately and severely handicapped students in public schools. Paper presented at the Organization for Cooperation and Development, Paris, November 1979.
6.
SousieS.EdelmanS.ChristieL.FoxT.FoxW.HillM.WilliamsW.YorkR.Providing interdisciplinary support to teachers in rural settings. Burlington, VT: Center for Developmental Disabilities, University of Vermont, 1978.
7.
BiklenD.BogdanR.Handicapism (slideshow). Syracuse, NY: Human Policy Press, 1976.
8.
SarsonC.BrightmanA.BlattJ.Feeling free (films). New York: Scholastic Magazine, Inc., 1978.
9.
VoeltzL.KishiG.BrownS.KubeC.Special friends training manual: Starting a project in your school. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, 1980.
10.
AlmondP.RodgersS.KrugD.Mainstreaming: A model for including elementary students in the severely handicapped classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children, 1979, 11, 135–139.
11.
ArkellC. J.ThomasonJ.HaringN.Deinstitutionalization of a residential facility. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 1980, 5, 107–120.
12.
BarnesE.BerriganC.BiklenD.What's the difference: Teaching positive attitudes toward people with disabilities. Syracuse, NY: Human Policy Press, 1978.
13.
BiklenD.The least restrictive environment: Its application to education. In MeltonG. B. (Ed.), Child and youth service and the law. New York: Haworth, in press.
14.
BiklenD.SokoloffM.What do you do when your wheelchair gets a flat tire?New York: Scholastic Magazine, Inc., 1978.
15.
BogdanR.TaylorS.Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York: John Wiley, 1975.
16.
BookbinderS. R.Meeting street school curriculum. Boston: Exceptional Parent Press, 1978.
17.
BrickerD. D.A rationale for the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped school children. In GuralnickM. J. (Ed.), Early intervention and the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1978.
18.
BrownL.BranstonM. B.Hamre-NietupskiS.JohnsonF.WilcoxB.GruenewaldL.A rationale for comprehensive longitudinal interactions between severely handicapped students and nonhandicapped students and other citizens. AAESPH Review, 1979, 4, 3–14.
19.
BrownL.WilcoxB.SontagE.VincentB.DoddN.GruenewaldL.Toward the realization of the least restrictive educational environments for severely handicapped students. AAESPH Review, 1977, 2, 195–201.
DybwadG.Avoiding misconceptions of mainstreaming, the least restrictive environment, and normalization. Exceptional Children, 1980, 47, 85–88.
22.
FredericksH. D. B. (Ed.). The teaching research curriculum for moderately and severely handicapped. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1980.
23.
GilhoolT.StutmanE.Integration of severely handicapped students: Toward criteria for implementing and enforcing the integrated imperative of P.L. 94–142 and Section 504. In Criteria for the evaluation of the least restrictive environment provisions. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Education for the Handicapped, 1978.
24.
GlaserB.StraussA.The discovery of ground theory. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
25.
GottliebJ.BudoffM.Social acceptability of retarded children in nongraded schools differing in architecture. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1973, 78, 15–19.
26.
GottliebJ.DavisJ. E.Social acceptance of EMRs during overt behavioral interaction. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1973, 78, 141–43.
27.
Hamre-NietupskiS.NietupskiJ.Integral involvement of severely handicapped students within regular public schools. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 1981, 6(2), 30–39.
28.
HaringN. J.BrownL. J. (Eds.). Teaching the severely handicapped. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1979.
29.
McHaleS. M.SimeonssonR. J.Effects of interaction on nonhandicapped children's attitudes toward autistic children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1980, 85, 18–24.
30.
MeltonG. B. (Ed.). Child and youth service and the law. New York: Haworth, in press.
31.
SailorW.WilcoxB.BrownL. (Eds.). Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1980.
32.
SontagE.SmithJ.CertoN. (Eds.). Educational programming for the severely and profoundly handicapped. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children, 1977.
33.
StainbackW.StainbackS.A review of research on interactions between severely handicapped and nonhandicapped students. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 1981, 6(3), 23–29.
34.
StainbackW.StainbackS.JabenT.Providing opportunities for interaction between severely handicapped and nonhandicapped students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 1981, 13, 72–75.
35.
ThomasonJ.ArkellC.Educating the severely/profoundly handicapped in the public schools: A side-by-side approach. Exceptional Children, 1980, 47, 114–122.
36.
VoeltzL. M.Children's attitudes toward handicapped peers. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1980, 84, 455–64.
37.
VoeltzL. M.Effects of structured interactions with severely handicapped peers on children's attitudes. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1982, 86, 380–90.
38.
WilcoxB.SailorW.Service delivery issues: Integrated educational systems. In WilcoxB.YorkR. (Eds.), Quality education for the severely handicapped: The federal investment. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 1980, 277–304.
39.
WilcoxB.YorkR. (Eds.). Quality education for the severely handicapped: The federal investment. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 1980.
