This article presents an empirical orientation for defining the least restrictive environment (LRE) for children with severe handicaps. The focus is on empirical analysis of both individual placement outcomes and general programmatic arrangements. A review of research explores the types of data that must be considered if educators are to make the best possible judgments regarding appropriate educational settings in terms of LRE for children with severe handicaps.
PARC 334 F. Supp. 1257 (E.D. Pa. 1971) and 343 F. Supp. 297 (E. D. Pa. 1972).
2.
RayJ. S.Etiological studies of behavior in delayed and nondelayed toddlers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1974.
3.
StetsonF. L.Critical administrative factors which facilitate the successful inclusion of severely handicapped students in the least restrictive environment: Six case studies. Report submitted to the U.S. Office of Civil Rights and the U.S. Office of Education, Bureau of Education for the Handicapped. Annandale, VA: JWK International, 1979.
4.
AllportG. W.The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1954.
5.
AmirY.Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 71, 319–342.
6.
ApolloniT. A.CookeS. R.CookeT. P.Establishing a normal peer as a behavior model for delayed toddlers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1977, 44, 231–241.
7.
ApolloniT. A.CookeT. P.Integrated programming at the infant, toddler, and preschool age levels. In GuralnickM. (Ed.), Early intervention and the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1978.
8.
ApolloniT. A.CookeT. P.Peer behavior conceptualized as a variable influencing infant and toddler development. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1975, 45, 4–17.
9.
AshmoreR. D.Background considerations in developing strategies for changing attitudes and behavior toward the mentally retarded. In BegabM. J.RichardsonS. A., The mentality retarded and society: A social science perspective. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1975.
10.
BallardM.CormanL.GottliebJ.KaufmanM. J.Improving the social status of mainstreamed retarded children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1977, 69, 605–611.
11.
Ballard-CampbellM.SemmelM. I.Policy research and special education: Research issues affecting policy formation and implementation. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1981, 2, 59–67.
12.
BanduraA.WaltersR. H.Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, & Winston, 1963.
13.
BatesP.The effectiveness of interpersonal skills training on the social skill acquisition of moderately and mildly retarded adults. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1980, 13, 237–248.
14.
BornsteinPhilip H.BachPaul J.McFallMiles E.FrimanPatrick C.LyonsPatricia D.Application of a social skills training program in the modification of interpersonal deficits among retarded adults: A clinical replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1980, 13, 171–176.
15.
BrickerD.A rationale for the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped preschool children. In GuralnickM. J. (Ed.), Early intervention and the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1978.
16.
BrownL.BranstonM. B.Hamre-NietupskiS.JohnsonF.WilcoxB.GruenewaldL.A rationale for comprehensive longitudinal interactions between severely handicapped students and nonhandicapped students and other citizens. AAESPH Review, 1979, 4, 3–14.
17.
BurtonT. A.HirshorenA.The education of severely and profoundly retarded children: Are we sacrificing the child to the concept?Exceptional Children, 1979, 45, 598–602.
18.
ChristopolosF.RenzP.A critical examination of special education programs. Journal of Special Education, 1969, 3, 371–379.
19.
CookeT. P.ApolloniT.Developing positive social emotional behaviors: A study of training and generalization effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975, 9, 65–78.
20.
CookeT. P.CookeS. R.ApolloniT.Developing nonretarded toddlers as verbal models for retarded classmates. Child Study Journal, 1978, 8, 1–8.
21.
CronbachL. J.SnowR. E.Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington, 1977.
22.
CsapoM.Peer models reverse the ‘one bad apple spoils the barrel’ theory. Teaching Exceptional Children, 1972, 4, 20–24.
23.
DeutchM.A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 1949, 2, 129–152.
24.
DonaldsonJ., Changing attitudes toward handicapped persons: A review and analysis of research. Exceptional Children, 46, 504–514, 1980.
25.
DunlopK. H.StonemanZ.CantrellM. L.Social interaction of exceptional and other children in a mainstreamed preschool. Exceptional Children, 1980, 47, 132–141.
26.
DunnL.Special education for the mildly retarded—Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 1968, 35, 5–22.
27.
FalveyM.BrownL.LyonS.BaumgartD.SchroederJ.Strategies for using cues and correction procedures. In SailorW.WilcoxB.BrownL. (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1980.
28.
FurmanW.RaheD. F.HartupW. W.Rehabilitation of socially withdrawn preschool children through mixed-age and same-age socialization. Child Development, 1979, 50, 915–922.
29.
GoodmanH.GottliebJ.HarrisonR. H.Social acceptance of EMRs integrated into a nongraded elementary school. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1972, 76, 412–417.
30.
GottliebJ.BudoffM.Social acceptability of retarded children in nongraded schools differing in architecture. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1973, 78, 15–19.
31.
GottliebJ.LeyserY.Friendship between mentally retarded and nonretarded children. In AsherS.GottmanJ. (Eds.), The development of friendship: Description and intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press, in press.
32.
GuralnickM. J.Integrated preschools as educational and therapeutic environments: Concepts, designs, and analysis. In GuralnickM. J. (Ed.), Early intervention and the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1978.
GuralnickM. J.The social behavior of preschool children at different developmental levels: Effects of group composition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1981, 31, 115–130.
35.
GuralnickM. J.The value of integrating handicapped and nonhandicapped preschool children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1976, 42, 236–245.
36.
HartupW. W.Peer interaction and the processes of socialization. In GuralnickM. J. (Ed.), Early intervention and the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1978.
37.
HartupW. W.CoatesB.Imitation of peers as a function of reinforcement from the peer group and rewardingness of the model. Child Development, 1967, 38, 1003–1016.
38.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T.Integrating handicapped students into the mainstream. Exceptional Children, 1980, 47, 90–98.
39.
JohnsonR.RyndersJ.JohnsonD.SchmidtB.HaiderS.Interaction between handicapped and nonhandicapped teenagers as a function of situational goal structuring: Implications for mainstreaming. American Educational Research Journal, 1979, 16, 161–167.
40.
LewinK.LippettR.WhiteR.Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates.”Journal of Social Psychology, 1939, 10, 271–299.
41.
McHaleS. M.SimeonssonR. J.Effects of interaction on nonhandicapped children's attitudes toward autistic children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1980, 85, 18–24.
42.
MahoneyD. M.HarperT. M.BraukmannC. J.FixenD. L.PhillipsE. L.WolfM. M.Teaching conversation-related skills to predelinquent girls. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1976, 9, 371.
43.
MyersD. G.LammH.The polarization effect of group discussions. American Scientist, 1975, 63, 297–303.
44.
NordquistV. M.A behavioral approach to the analysis of peer interactions. In GuralnickM. J. (Ed.), Early intervention and the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children, Baltimore: University Park Press, 1978, 53–84.
45.
O'ConnerR. D.Modification of social withdrawal through symbolic modeling. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 1969, 2, 15–22.
46.
O'ConnerR. D.Relative efficacy of modeling, shaping, and the combined procedures for modification of social withdrawal. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1972, 79, 327–334.
47.
OdenS.AsherS. R.Coaching children in social skills for friendship making. Child Development, 1977, 48, 495–506.
48.
PeckC. A.ApolloniT.CookeT. P.RaverS.Teaching retarded preschool children to imitate nonhandicapped peers: Training and generalized effects. Journal of Special Education, 1978, 12, 195–207.
49.
PeckC. A.CookeT. P.ApolloniT.Utilization of peer imitation in therapeutic and instructional contexts. In StrainPhillip S. (Ed.), The utilization of classroom peers as behavior change agents. New York: Plenum Press, 1981.
50.
PetersonN. L.HaralickJ. G.Integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped preschoolers: An analysis of play behavior and social interaction. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1977, 12, 235–245.
51.
RyndersJ.JohnsonR.JohnsonD. W.SchmidtB.Effects of cooperative goal structuring in producing positive interaction between Down's Syndrome and nonhandicapped teenagers: Implications for mainstreaming. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1980, 85, 268–273.
52.
SandlerA.RobinsonR.Public attitudes and community acceptance of mentally retarded persons: A review. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1981, 16, 97–103.
53.
ScrivenM.Some issues in the logic and ethics of mainstreaming. Minnesota Education, 1976, 2, 61–67.
54.
SemmelM. I.GottliebJ.RobinsonN. M.Mainstreaming: Perspectives on educating handicapped children in the public schools. In BerlinerD. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 7), American Educational Research Association, Peacock Publishers, 1979.
55.
SherifM.HarveyO. J.WhiteB. J.HoodW. R.SherifC. W.Experimental study of positive and negative intergroup attitudes between experimentally produced groups: Robbers cave study. Norman: University of Oklahoma, 1954.
56.
SindelarP.Operationalizing the concept of the least restrictive environment. Education and Treatment of Children, 1981, 4, 279–290.
57.
SingletonC.AsherS. R.Racial integration and children's peer preferences: An investigation of developmental and cohort differences. Child Development, 1979, 50, 936–941.
58.
SipersteinG. N.BakJ. J.GottliebJ.Effects of group discussion on children's attitudes toward handicapped peers. Journal of Educational Research, 1977, 70, 131–134.
59.
StrainP. S.Effects of peer social initiations on withdrawn preschool children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1977, 5, 445–455.
60.
StrainP. S.KerrM. M.RaglandE. V.Effects of peer-mediated social initiations and prompting/reinforcement procedures on the social behavior of autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1979, 9, 41–54.
61.
StrainP. S.ShoresR. E.Social reciprocity: A review of research and educational implications. Exceptional Children, 1977, 43, 526–530.
62.
StrainP. S.ShoresR. E.TimmM. A.Effects of peer social initiations on the behavior of withdrawn preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977, 10, 289–298.
VoeltzL.Children's attitudes toward handicapped peers. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1980, 84, 455–464.
65.
WehmanP.HillJ. W.Instructional programming for severely handicapped youth: A community integration approach. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University, 1980.
66.
WolfM. M.Social validation: The case for subjective measurement on how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1978, 11, 203–214.
67.
WolfsenbergerW.Normalization: The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto, Canada: National Institute on Mental Retardation, 1972.
68.
YoungClifford C.KerrMary Margaret. The effect of a retarded child's social initiations on the behavior of severely retarded school-aged peers. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1979, 14, 185–190.
