Past research has suggested skills critical for entry into sheltered employment. To date, no research suggests the skills one might include in a prevocational curriculum for severely handicapped persons wishing employment in nonsheltered settings. Thus, the present study sought to determine potential employers' expectations for entry into competitive employment by utilizing social validation methodology. Questionnaires were sent to 120 potential employers representing food service and janitorial/maid service occupations. They were asked to answer 47 questions derived for the Mithaug and Hagmeier (1978) study. The respondents (66% of the sample) suggested 70 survival skills necessary for entry into competitive employment. Five skills were unanimously agreed upon: verbally reciting one's full name upon request, demonstrating basic addition skills, keeping one's hair combed, following one instruction at a time, and completing repetitive tasks previously learned to proficiency within 0 to 25% of the average rate. Results of this study are discussed, with implications for longitudinal curriculum development.
AlperS.Utilizing community jobs in developing vocational curriculum for severely handicapped youth. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1981, 16, 217–221.
2.
BatesP.PancsofarE.Project EARN (Employment and Rehabilitation = Normalization): A competitive employment training program for severely disabled youth in the public schools. Education and Treatment of Children, in press.
3.
BrolinD. E.Vocational preparation of retarded citizens. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill, 1976.
4.
BrownL.PumpianI.BaumgartD.VandeventerP.FordA.NisbetJ.SchroederJ.GruenewaldL.Longitudinal transition plans in programs for severely handicapped students. Exceptional Children, 1981, 47, 624–631.
KazdinA. E.Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1977, 1, 427–452.
7.
KazdinA. E.MatsonJ. L.Social validation in mental retardation. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 1981, 2, 39–54.
8.
KirpD. L.Law, politics, and equal educational opportunity: The limits of judicial involvementsHarvard Educational Review, 1977, 47, 117–137.
9.
KirpD. L.KuriloffP. J.BussW. G.Legal mandates and organizational change. In HobbsN. (Ed.), Issues in the classification of children (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.
10.
MenchettiB. M.RuschF. R.LamsonD. S.Employers' perceptions of acceptable training procedures for use in competitive employment settings. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 1981, 6, 6–16.
11.
MithaugD. E.Critical steps in developing a prevocational training program for severely handicapped young adults. In YorkR. L.EdgarE. (Eds.), Teaching the severely handicapped: Vol. 4. Columbus, OH: American Association for the Education of the Severely/Profoundly Handicapped, 1979.
12.
MithaugD. E.Prevocational training for retarded students. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1981.
13.
MithaugD. E.HagmeierL. D.The development of procedures to assess prevocational competencies of severely handicapped young adultsAAESPH Review, 1978, 3, 94–115.
14.
MithaugD. E.HagmeierL. D.HaringN. G.The relationship between training activities and job placement in vocational education of the severely and profoundly handicapped. AAESPH Review, 1977, 2, 89–109.
15.
MithaugD. E.HanawaltD. A.The validation of procedures to assess prevocational task preferences in retarded adults. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1978, 11, 153–162.
MithaugD. E.MarD.StewartJ.McCalmonD.Assessing prevocational competencies of profoundly, severely, and moderately retarded persons. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 1980, 5, 270–284.
18.
RuschF. R.Competitive employment. In SnellM. (Ed.), Systematic instruction of the moderately and severely handicapped (2nd Ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill, in press.
19.
RuschF. R.Toward the validation of social/vocational survival skills. Mental Retardation, 1979, 17, 143–145.
20.
RuschF. R.MenchettiB. M.Increasing compliant work behaviors in a non-sheltered setting. Mental Retardation, 1981, 19, 102–112.
21.
RuschF. R.MithaugD. E.Vocational training for mentally retarded adults: A behavior analytic approach. Champaign, IL: Research Press, 1980.
22.
RuschF. R.SchutzR. P.Vocational and social work behavior research: An evaluative review. In MatsonJ. L.McCartneyJ. R. (Eds.), Handbook of behavior modification with the mentally retarded, New York: Plenum Press, 1981.
23.
SchutzR. P.JostesK.RuschF. R.LamsonD.The use of contingent preinstruction and social validation in the acquisition, generalization, and maintenance of sweeping and mopping responses. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1980, 15, 306–311.
24.
SchutzR. P.RuschF. R.Competitive employment: Toward employment integration for mentally retarded persons. In LynchK. P.KiernanW. E.StarkJ. A. (Eds.), Prevocational and vocational education for special needs youth: A blueprint for the 1980s. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1982.
25.
ShapiroE. S.Self-control procedures with the mentally retarded. In HersenM.EislerR. M.MillerP. M. (Eds.), Progress in behavior modification (Vol. 12). New York: Academic Press, in press.
26.
ThurmanS. K.FiorelliJ. S.Perspectives on normalization. Journal of Special Education, 1979, 13, 339–346.
27.
Van HoutenR.Social validation: The evolution of standards of competency for target behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1979, 12, 581–592.
28.
WehmanP.Competitive employment: New horizons for severely disabled individuals. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1981.
29.
WolfM. M.Social validity: The case for subjective measurement, or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1978, 11, 203–214.
30.
WoolH.The labor supply for low level occupations. Research and Development Monograph, No. 42. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, 1976.
