A trainer delivered sensory stimulation, similar to that received during self-stimulation, to one autistic and one multihandicapped child contingent upon correct response to a manipulative task. The use of an ABAB research design demonstrated the reinforcement effect of the contingent sensory stimulation. The use of this technique in applied settings is discussed, and the hypothesis that self-stimulation is a reinforcing behavior is supported.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FrankelF.FreemanB. J.RitvoE.ChikampB.CarrE.Effects of frequency of photic stimulation upon autistic and retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1976, 81, 32–40.
2.
GuessD.RutherfordG.Experimental attempts to reduce stereotyping among blind retardates. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1967, 71, 984–986.
3.
HargraveE.SwisherL.Modfying the verbal expression of a child with autistic behaviors. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 1975, 5, 147–154.
4.
KentL.Language acquisition for the retarded. Champaign, Ill.: Research Press, 1974.
5.
KoegelR. L.CovertA.The relationship of self-stimulation to learning in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972, 5, 381–388.
6.
KoegelR. L.FirestoneP. B.KrammeK. W.DunlapG.Increasing spontaneous play by suppressing self-stimulation in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974, 7, 521–528.
7.
LovaasO. I.Recent developments in behavior modification with autistic children. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Society for Autistic Children, 1975.
8.
LovaasO. I.KoegelR. L.SimmonsJ. Q.LongJ. S.Some generalization and follow-up measures on autistic children in behavior therapy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973, 1–36.
9.
LovaasO. I.LitrownikA.MannR.Response latencies to auditory stimuli of autistic children engaged in self-stimulatory behavior. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1971, 9, 39–49.
