BerkmanK. A.MeyerL. H. (1988). Alternative strategies and multiple outcomes in the remediation of severe self-injury: Going “all out” nonaversively. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13(2), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079698801300204
2.
GuessD.HelmstetterE.TurnbullH. R.IIIKnowltonS. (1987). Use of aversive procedures with persons who are disabled: An historical review and critical analysis (Monograph No. 2). The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps.
3.
HornerR. H.DunlapG.KoegelR. L.CarrE. G.SailorW.AndersonJ.AlbinR. W.O’NeillR. E. (1990). Toward a technology of “nonaversive” behavioral support. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15(3), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699001500301
4.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997. (Pub. L. No. 105–17, 111 Stat. 37).
5.
KuhnT. S. (1997). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
6.
MacSuga-GageA. S.GageN. A.KatsiyannisA.ShannaE.HirschS. E.KisnerH. (2021). Disproportionate corporal punishment of students with disabilities and Black and Hispanic students. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 32(3), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207320949960
7.
MulickJ.ButterE. M. (2016). Positive behavior support: A paternalistic utopian delusion. In FoxxR. M.MulickJ. A. (Eds.), Controversial therapies for autism and intellectual disabilities. Routledge.
8.
NewsomeC.KroegerK. (2016). Nonaversive treatment. In JacobsonJ. W.FoxxR. M.MulickJ. A. (Eds.), Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities: Fads, fashion, and science in professional practice (pp. 322–338). Lawrence Erlbaum.