This qualitative study examined the experiences of parents who sought inclusive education for their children with intellectual disabilities or extensive support needs. Data were collected from 33 participants in the form of narratives that emerged through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using a phenomenological methodology. Findings revealed the existence of problematic special education practices and illuminated the mechanisms through which ability-based segregation in schools is institutionally sanctioned. Many parents reported that placement in a general education environment with the provision of support was not considered by professionals at their children’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) meetings. Instead, they were informed that education in separate classrooms was in their children’s best interest. Parents pushed back and advocated for access and inclusivity, often investing immense amounts of time and resources toward this end. The findings shed light on special education discourses that are entrenched in ableist notions about disability and uphold an implicit ideology of separate but equal for students with certain disabilities.
AgranM.JacksonL.KurthJ. A.RyndakD.BurnetteK.JamesonM.ZagonaA.FitzpatrickH.WehmeyerM. (2020). Why aren’t students with severe disabilities being placed in general education classrooms: Examining the relations among classroom placement, learner outcomes, and other factors. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919878134
ArtilesJ. A.Harris-MurriN.RostenbergD. (2006). Inclusion as social justice: Critical notes on discourses, assumptions, and the road ahead. Theory Into Practice, 45(3), 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4503_8
4.
BaconJ.RoodC. E.FerriB. A. (2016). Promoting access through segregation: The emergence of the prioritized curriculum class. Teachers College Record, 118(14), 1–22.
BakerB. (2016). The hunt for disability: The new eugenics and the normalization of school children. In AllanJ.ArtilesA. J. (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2017: Assessment inequalities (pp. 137–173). Routledge.
7.
BogdanR.BiklenS. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Allyn & Bacon.
8.
BrockM. E. (2018). Trends in the educational placement of students with intellectual disability in the United States over the past 40 years. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 123(4), 305–314. https://doi.org//10.1352/1944-7558-123.4.305
DavisL. (2006). Constructing normalcy. In DavisL. (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 9–28). Routledge.
11.
DenzinN. K. (2001). Interpretive interactionism (Vol. 16). Sage.
12.
HarryB.Ocasio-StoutenburgL. (2020). Meeting families where they are: Building equity through advocacy with diverse schools and communities. Teachers College Press.
13.
HehirT. (2005). New directions in special education: Eliminating ableism in policy and practice. Harvard Education Press.
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. P.L. 108-446 (2004).
15.
KalyanpurM.HarryB.SkrticT. (2000). Equity and advocacy expectations of culturally diverse families’ participation in special education. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/713671106
16.
KirbyM. (2017). Implicit assumptions in special education policy: Promoting full inclusion for students with learning disabilities. Child & Youth Care Forum, 46(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9382-x
17.
KleinertH. L. (2020). Students with the most significant disabilities, communicative competence, and the full extent of their exclusion. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919892740
18.
KozleskiE. B. (2020). Disrupting what passes as inclusive education: Predicating educational equity on schools designed for all. The Educational Forum, 84(4), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2020.1801047
19.
KurthJ. A.AllcockH.WalkerV. L.OlsonA.TaubD. (2021). Faculty perceptions of expertise for inclusive education for students with significant disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(2), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406420921582
20.
KurthJ. A.BornK.LoveH. (2016). Ecobehavioral characteristics of self-contained high school classrooms for students with severe cognitive disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(4), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916661492
21.
KurthJ. A.RupparA. L.ToewsS. G.McCabeK.McQuestonJ. A.JohnstonR. (2019). Considerations in placement decisions for students with extensive support needs: An analysis of LRE statements. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918825479
22.
LalvaniP. (2012). Parents’ participation in special education in the context of implicit educational ideologies and socioeconomic status. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(4), 474–486.
23.
LalvaniP. (2013). Privilege, compromise, or social justice: Teachers’ conceptualizations of inclusive education. Disability and Society, 28(1), 14–27. http://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.692028
24.
LalvaniP.HaleC. (2015). Squeaky wheels, mothers from hell, and CEOs of the IEP: Parents, privilege, and the “fight” for inclusive education. Understanding and Dismantling Privilege, 5(2), 21–41.
25.
LintonS. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. NYU Press.
26.
MilesH.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.
27.
MillerA. J.LoveH. R.KurthJ. A.ZagonaA. L. (2019). Parent identity and family-school partnerships: Animating diverse enactments for (special) education decision making. Inclusion, 7(2), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-7.2.92
28.
MorningstarM. E.KurthJ. A.JohnsonP. E. (2017). Examining national trends in educational placements for students with significant disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516678327
OliverM. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Macmillan Publishers Limited.
31.
OsiejaE. (2021). (Re)Framing the discourse of parent involvement: Calling on the knowledge of Latinx mothers. ProQuest Dissertations.
32.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
33.
RileyM. L. (2021). Labor of last resort: Mothers navigating special education in a context of resource scarcity [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon]. Creative Commons.
34.
RossettiZ.BurkeM. M.HughesO.Schraml-BlockK.RiveraJ.RiosK.JaT.LeeJ. S. H. (2021). Parent perceptions of the advocacy expectation in special education. Exceptional Children, 87(4), 438–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402921994095
35.
RyndakD. L.TaubD.JorgensenC. M.Gonsier-GerdinJ.ArndtK.SauerJ.RupparA. L.MorningstarM. E.AllcockH. (2014). Policy and the impact on placement, involvement, and progress in general education. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796914533942
36.
SauerJ. S.JorgensenC. M. (2016). Still caught in the continuum: A critical analysis of least restrictive environment and its effect on placement of students with intellectual disability. Inclusion, 4(2), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-4.2.56
37.
SleeR. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. Routledge.
TaylorS. J. (2004). Caught in the continuum: A critical analysis of the principle of the least restrictive environment. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 29(4), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.29.4.218
40.
TiwariM. (2019). Karma, dogma, and the perfect child. In LalvaniP. (Ed.), Constructing the (m)other: Narratives of disability, motherhood, and the politics of normal (pp. 179–186). Peter Lang.
41.
TrainorA. A. (2010). Diverse approaches to parent advocacy during special education home-school interactions: Identification and Use of Cultural and Social Capital. Remedial and Special Education, 31(1), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508324401
TurnbullA. P.TurnbullR. (2020). Rights, wrongs, and remedies for inclusive education for students with significant support needs: Professional development, research, and policy reform. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919896097
44.
UNESCO. (1994). The salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education.
WellsA. S. (2018). The process of racial resegregation in housing and schools: The sociology of reputation. In ScottR.BucchmanM. (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–14). John Wiley.
47.
YossoT. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006
