A growing body of literature supports the effectiveness of Modified Schema-Based Instruction (MSBI) to improve mathematical problem-solving for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disability (ID). MSBI is an intervention package that teaches students to identify the problem structure and use a problem-solving heuristic to solve mathematical word problems. Previous research has primarily implemented MSBI in a one-on-one setting with a researcher as the interventionist. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a teacher-delivered MSBI in a small group format on the multiplicative word problem-solving skills of six middle school students with ASD/ID as well as their ability to generalize from word problems to video-based problems. Results of the multiple probe across participants design indicate a functional relation between MSBI and word problem-solving, but generalization varied across participants and maintenance was limited to two participants due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic school closures. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.LoY-ySaundersA. F.RootJ. R.Ley DavisL.BroshC. R. (2018). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disability to solve word problems. The Journal of Special Education, 51(4), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917721236
2.
BrownL.NietupskiJ.Hamre-NietupskiS. (1976). Criterion of ultimate functioning. In ThomasM. A. (Ed.), Hey, don’t forget about me! Education’s investment in the severely, profoundly, and multiply handicapped (pp. 2–15). Council for Exceptional Children.
3.
ClausenA. M.TappM. C.PenningtonR. C.SpoonerF.TeasdellA. (2021). A systematic review of modified schema based instruction for teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities to solve mathematical word problem. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 46(2), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969211007561
4.
ConnollyA. J. (2007). KeyMath 3: Diagnostic assessment. Pearson.
5.
CookS. C.CollinsL. W.MorinL. L.RiccominiP. J. (2020). Schema-based instruction for mathematical word problem solving: An evidence-based review for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 43(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948718823080
6.
de BoerH.DonkerA. S.van der WerfM. P. C. (2014). Effects of the attributes of educational interventions on students’ academic performance: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 84(4), 509–545. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314540006
7.
DoorenW. V.BockD. D.VerschaffelL. (2010). From addition to multiplication. . . and back: The development of students’ additive and multiplicative reasoning skills. Cognition and Instruction, 28(3), 360–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2010.488306
GierutJ. A.MorrisetteM. L.DickinsonS. L. (2015). Effect size for single-subject design in phonological treatment. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 58(5), 1464–1481. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0299
10.
GilleyD. P.RootJ. R.CoxS. K. (2021). Development of mathematics and self-determination skills for young adults with extensive support needs. The Journal of Special Education, 54(4), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466920902768
11.
GriffinC. C.JitendraA. K. (2009). Word problem-solving instruction in inclusive third-grade mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(3), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.3200?JOER.102.3.187-202
12.
HedgesL. V.PutsejovskyJ. E.SadishW. R. (2012). A standardized mean difference effect size for single case designs. Research Synthesis Methods, 3(3), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1052
13.
HegartyM.KozhevnikovM. (1999). Types of visual–spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 684–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.684
14.
HornerR. D.BaerD. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple baselines. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(1), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-189
15.
HwangJ.RiccominiP. J. (2016). Enhancing mathematical problem solving for secondary students with or at risk of learning disabilities: A literature review. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(3), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12105
16.
JitendraA. K.DiPipiC. M.Perron-JonesN. (2002). An exploratory study of schema-based word-problem solving instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities: An emphasis on conceptual and procedural understanding. The Journal of Special Education, 36(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669020360010301
17.
JitendraA. K.DupuisD. N.ZaslofskyA. F. (2014). Curriculum-based measurement and standards-based mathematics: Monitoring the arithmetic word problem-solving performance of third-grade students at risk for mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(4), 241–251. https://doi.org/1077/0731948713516766
18.
JitendraA. K.Petersen-BrownS.LeinA. E.ZaslofskyA. F.KunkelA. K.JungP. G.EganA. M. (2015). Teaching mathematical word problem solving: The quality of evidence for strategy instruction priming the problem structure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413487408
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
21.
LeinA. E.JitendraA. K.HarwellM. R. (2020). Effects of mathematical word problem solving interventions for students with learning disabilities and/or mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1388–1408. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000453
22.
Ley DavisL. (2016). Effects of peer-mediated instruction on mathematical problem solving for students with moderate/severe intellectual disability [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina Charlotte]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
MiltenbergerR. G. (2015). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures. Cengage Learning.
25.
MontagueM.EndersC.DietzS. (2011). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on math problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(4), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948711421762
NunesT.BryantP. (2015). The development of mathematical reasoning. In LibenL. S.MüllerU. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Cognitive processes (7 ed., Vol. 2, pp. 715–764). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy217
29.
NunesT.BryantP.GottardisL.TerlektsiM.-E.EvansD. (2015). Can we really teach problem solving in primary school?Mathematics Teaching, 246, 44–48.
30.
PeltierC. J.LingoM. E.AutryF.DeardorffM. E.PalaciosM. (2020). Schema-based instruction implemented under routine conditions. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 37(3), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2020.1821273
31.
PeltierC. J.SinclairT. E.PulosJ. M.SukA. (2020). Effects of schema-based instruction on immediate, generalized, and combined structured word problems. The Journal of Special Education, 54(2), 101–112. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919883397
32.
PeltierC. J.VannestK. J. (2017). A meta-analysis of schema instruction on the problem-solving performance of elementary school students. Review of Educational Research, 87(5), 899–920. https://doi.org/10.3102?2F0034654317720163
33.
PeltierC. J.VannestK. J.MarbachJ. J. (2018). A meta-analysis of schema instruction implemented in single-case experimental designs. The Journal of Special Education, 52(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002266918763173
RootJ. R.CoxS. K.DavisK.HammonsN. (2020). Contextualizing mathematical problem solving instruction for secondary students with extensive support needs: A systematic replication. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(4), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1540796920949448
36.
RootJ. R.CoxS. K.GilleyD.WadeT. (2021). Using a virtual-representational-abstract integrated framework to teach multiplicative problem solving to middle school students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(7), 2284–2296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04674-2
37.
RootJ. R.CoxS. K.HammonsN.SaundersA. F.GilleyD. (2018). Contextualizing mathematics: Teaching problem solving to secondary students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56(6), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-56.6.442
38.
RootJ. R.CoxS. K.SaundersA.GilleyD. (2020). Applying the universal design for learning framework to mathematics instruction for learners with extensive support needs. Remedial and Special Education, 41(4), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741932519887235
39.
RootJ. R.IngelinB.CoxS. K. (2021). Teaching mathematical word problem solving to students with autism spectrum disorder: A best-evidence synthesis. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 56(4), 420–436.
40.
SpoonerF.RootJ. R.SaundersA. F.BrowderD. M. (2019). An updated evidence-based practice review on teaching mathematics to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741932517751055
41.
SpoonerF.SaundersA.RootJ.BroshC. (2017). Promoting access to common core mathematics for students with severe disabilities through mathematical problem solving. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(3), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F15040796917697119
42.
ThompsonP. W. (1993). Quantitative reasoning, complexity, and additive structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25(3), 165–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273861
43.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). What Works Clearinghouse standards handbook, Version 4.1. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks
44.
WoodwardJ.BeckmannS.DriscollM.FrankeM.HerzigP.JitendraA.KoedingerK. R.OgbuehiP. (2012). Improving mathematical problem solving in grades 4 through 8: A practice guide (NCEE 2012-4055). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/MPS_PG_043012.pdf
45.
XinY. P. (2008). The effect of schema-based instruction in solving word problems: An emphasis on pre-algebraic conceptualization of multiplicative relations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 39, 526–551. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40539313
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
