The purpose of this literature review was to synthesize recent research (2009–2018) for teaching science to students with intellectual disability and intellectual disability/autism. Authors identified a total of 15 studies; of these, 12 were determined to be methodologically sound studies using the Council for Exceptional Children quality indicators. Based on the methodologically sound studies, authors analyzed the evidence base of the instructional practices to teach science content and science practices to students with intellectual disability and intellectual disability/autism. Unlike previous literature reviews in which the focus has been on teaching science content, authors contribute to the literature on teaching science to this population by determining the evidence for teaching the science practices (e.g., asking questions, communicating findings). Resulting analysis was used to offer research-based recommendations for providing quality science instruction to students with intellectual disability and intellectual disability/autism. We conclude with limitations and possibilities for future research.
AgranM.CavinM.WehmeyerM.PalmerS. (2006). Participation of students with moderate to severe disabilities in the general curriculum: The effects of the self-determined learning model of instruction. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 230–241.
2.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
Arthur-KellyM.SigafoosJ.GreenV.MathisenB.Arthur-KellyR. (2009). Issues in the use of visual supports to promote communication in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Disability and Rehabilitation: An International, Multidisciplinary Journal, 31, 1474–1486.
4.
*CollinsB. C.HagerK. L.GallowayC. C. (2011). Addition of functional content during core content instruction with students with moderate disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 22–39.
5.
CookB.BuysseV.KlingnerJ.LandrumT.McWilliamR.TankersleyM.TestD. (2014). Council for Exceptional Children: Standards for evidence-based practices in special education. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46, 206–212.
*CourtadeG. R.BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.DiBiaseW. (2010). Training teachers to use an inquiry-based task analysis to teach science to students with moderate and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 378–399.
8.
CourtadeG. R.SpoonerF.BrowderD. M. (2007). Review of studies with students with significant cognitive disabilities which link to science standards. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32, 43–49.
9.
EngelmannS.CarnineD. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. New York, NY: Irvington.
10.
GanzJ. B. (2008). Self-monitoring across age and ability levels: Teaching students to implement their own positive behavioral interventions. Preventing School Failure, 53, 39–48.
11.
GoldsteinH.KaczmarekL.PenningtonR.ShaferK. (1992). Peer-mediated intervention: Attending to, commenting on, and acknowledging the behavior of preschoolers with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 289–305.
12.
*HeinrichS.CollinsB. C.KnightV.SpriggsA. D. (2016). Embedded simultaneous prompting procedure to teach STEM content to high school students with moderate disabilities in an inclusive setting. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 41–54.
13.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
14.
*HudsonM. E.BrowderD. M.JimenezB. A. (2014). Effects of a peer-delivered system of least prompts intervention and adapted science read-alouds on listening comprehension for participants with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 60–77.
15.
HudsonM. E.BrowderD. M.WoodL. A. (2013). Review of experimental research on academic learning by students with moderate and severe intellectual disability in general education. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38, 17–29.
*JimenezB. A.BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.DiBiaseW. (2012). Inclusive inquiry science using peer-mediated embedded instruction for students with moderate intellectual disability. Exceptional Children, 78, 301–317.
18.
*KarlJ.CollinsB. C.HagerK. D.AultM. J. (2013). Teaching core content embedded in a functional activity to students with moderate intellectual disability using a simultaneous prompting procedure. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 363–378.
19.
*KnightV. F.CollinsB.SpriggsA. D.SartiniE.MacDonaldM. J. (2018). Scripted and unscripted science lessons for children with autism and intellectual disability. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48, 2542–2557. doi:10.1007/s10803-018-3514-0
20.
*KnightV. F.SmithB. R.SpoonerF.BrowderD. (2012). Using explicit instruction to teach science descriptors to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 378–389.
21.
*KnightV. F.SpoonerF.BrowderD. M.SmithB. R.WoodC. L. (2013). Using systematic instruction and graphic organizers to teach science concepts to students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 48, 115–126. doi:10.1177/1088357612475301
22.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E. (1992). Science for students with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 62, 377–411.
23.
McDonnellJ.JohnsonJ. W.PolychronisS.RisenT. (2002). Effects of embedded instruction on students with moderate disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 363–377.
24.
*MillerB.DoughtyT.KrockoverG. (2015). Using science inquiry methods to promote self-determination and problem-solving skills for students with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 356–368.
25.
*MillerB.Taber-DoughtyT. (2014). Self-monitoring checklists for inquiry problem-solving: Functional problem-solving methods for students with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 555–567.
26.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
27.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas (Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
28.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
29.
OsborneJ. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 177–196.
*RiggsL.CollinsB. C.KleinertH.KnightV. F. (2013). Teaching principles of heredity to high school students with moderate and severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38, 30–43.
32.
*RiveraC. J.HudsonM. E.WeissS. L.ZamboneA. (2017). Using a multicomponent multimedia shared story intervention with an iPad to teach content picture vocabulary to students with developmental disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children, 40, 327–352.
33.
*SmithB. R.SpoonerF.JimenezB. A.BrowderD. (2013). Using an early science curriculum to teach science vocabulary and concepts to students with severe developmental disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children, 36, 1–31.
34.
SpoonerF.KnightV. F.BrowderD. M.JimenezB.DiBiaseW. (2011). Evaluating evidence-based practice in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36, 62–75.
35.
SpoonerF.McKissickB. R.HudsonM.BrowderD. M. (2014). Access to the general education curriculum in general education classes. In AgranM.BrownF.HughesC.QuirkC.RyndakD. (Eds.), Equity and full participation for individuals with severe disabilities: A vision for the future (pp. 217–234). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
36.
SpoonerF.McKissickB. R.KnightV. F. (2017). Establishing the state of affairs for evidence-based practices in students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42, 8–18.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
