Treatment intensity is an aspect of communication intervention that has received limited empirical attention. In this article, we discuss key parameters of treatment intensity related to individuals with complex communication needs who use augmentative and alternative communication. We advocate for an examination of treatment intensity along with learner and intervention characteristics that may moderate or mediate treatment intensity. In addition, we discuss the influence that contextual fit/treatment acceptability may have on intervention success. We also discuss the challenges created by a number of interacting variables that make determining optimal dosage for groups of individuals difficult. Finally, treatment intensity is briefly discussed in terms of its possible influence on maintenance and generalization.
BarnettD. W.DalyE. J.IIIJonesK. M.LentzF.Jr. (2004). Response to intervention: Empirically based special service decisions from single-case designs of increasing and decreasing intensity. Journal of Special Education, 38(2), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669040380020101
3.
BernalG.Sáez-SantiagoE. (2006). Culturally centered psychosocial interventions. Journal of Community Psychology, 34(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20096
4.
BransonD.DemchakM. (2009). The use of augmentative and alternative communication methods with infants and toddlers with disabilities: A research review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25(4), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434610903384529
5.
BrunnerD. L.SeungH. (2009). Evaluation of the efficacy of communication-based treatments for autism spectrum disorders: A literature review. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 31(1), 15–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740108324097
6.
CepedaN. J.PashlerH.VulE.WixtedJ. T.RohrerD. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
7.
CirrinF.SchoolingT.NelsonN.DiehlS.FlynnP.StaskowskiM.TorreyT.AdamczykD. (2010). Evidence-based systematic review: Effects of different service delivery models on communication outcomes for elementary school–age children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41(3), 233–264. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0128)
8.
CoddingR. S.LaneK. L. (2015). A spotlight on treatment intensity: An important and often overlooked component of intervention inquiry. Journal of Behavior Education, 24, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-014-9210-z
9.
CummingsA.HallgrimsonJ.RobinsonS. (2019). Speech intervention outcomes associated with word lexicality and intervention intensity. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-18-0026
10.
EikesethS.SmithT.JahrE.EldevikS. (2002). Intensive behavioral treatment at school for 4-to 7-year-old children with autism: A 1-year comparison controlled study. Behavior Modification, 26(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445502026001004
11.
EldevikS.HastingsR. P.HughesJ. C.JahrE.EikesethS.CrossS. (2009). Meta- analysis of early intensive behavioral intervention for children with autism. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 38(3), 439–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410902851739
12.
FeyM. E.YoderP. J.WarrenS. F.Bredin-OjaS. L. (2013). Is more better? Milieu communication teaching in toddlers with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(2), 679–693. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0061)
13.
FidlerD. J. (2005). The emerging Down syndrome behavioral phenotype in early childhood: Implications for practice. Infants and Young Children, 18(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001163-200504000-00003
14.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
15.
GanzJ. B.Earles-VollrathT. L.HeathA. K.ParkerR. I.RispoliM. J.DuranJ. B. (2012). A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative communication systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1212-2
16.
GardinerE.FrenchC. (2011). The relevance of cultural sensitivity in early intervention. Exceptionality Education International, 21(3), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v21i3.7681
17.
GernsbacherM. A.SauerE. A.GeyeH. M.SchweigertE. K.Hill GoldsmithH. (2008). Infant and toddler oral-and manual-motor skills predict later speech fluency in autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01820.x
18.
GevarterC.O’ReillyM. F.RojeskiL.SammarcoN.LangR.LancioniG. E.SigafoosJ. (2013). Comparing communication systems for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of single-case research studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(12), 4415–4432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.017
GreshamF. M. (2004). Current status and future directions of school-based behavioral interventions. School Psychology Review, 33(3), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2004.12086252
21.
GuoY.DyniaJ. M.LoganJ. A.JusticeL. M.Breit-SmithA.KaderavekJ. N. (2016). Fidelity of implementation for an early-literacy intervention: Dimensionality and contribution to children’s intervention outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 37(4), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.06.001
HornerR. H.BlitzC. (2014, September). The importance of contextual fit when implementing evidence-based interventions (Issue Brief No. 2). Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/77066/ib_Contextual.pdf
24.
HornerR. H.McDonnellJ. J.BellamyG. T. (1986). Teaching generalized skills: General case instruction in simulation and community settings. In HornerR. H.MeyerL. H.FredericksH. D. (Eds.), Education of learners with severe handicaps: Exemplary service strategies (pp. 289–314). Paul H. Brookes.
25.
HowlinP.MagiatiI.CharmanT. (2009). Systematic review of early intensive behavioral interventions for children with autism. American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 114(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1352/2009.114:23;nd41
26.
KonstM. J.MatsonJ. L.TuryginN. (2013). Comparing the rates of tantrum behavior in children with ASD and ADHD as well as children with comorbid ASD and ADHD diagnoses. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(11), 1339–1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.07.023
27.
KuhnJ. L.VanegasS. B.SalgadoR.BorjasS. K.MagañaS.Smith DaWaltL. (2020). The cultural adaptation of a transition program for Latino families of youth with autism spectrum disorder. Family Process, 59(2), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12439
28.
LaneK. L.Beebe-FrankenbergerM. E. (2004). School-based interventions: The tools you need to succeed. Allyn & Bacon.
29.
Lieberman-BetzR. G.YoderP.StoneW. L.NahmiasA. S.CarterA. S.Çelimli-AksoyS.MessingerD. S. (2014). An illustration of using multiple imputation versus listwise deletion analyses: The effect of Hanen’s “more than words” on parenting stress. American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 119(5), 472–486. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-119.5.472
30.
LightJ.McNaughtonD. (2012). The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: Past, present, and future challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(4), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2012.737024
31.
LovaasO. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.55.1.3
32.
MoralesM.MundyP.DelgadoC. E.YaleM.MessingerD.NealR.SchwartzH. K. (2000). Responding to joint attention across the 6-through 24-month age period and early language acquisition. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(3), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00040-4
33.
NajdowskiA. C.WallaceM. D.PenrodB.TarboxJ.ReagonK.HigbeeT. S. (2008). Caregiver-conducted experimental functional analyses of inappropriate mealtime behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41(3), 459–465. https://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2008.41-459
34.
National Research Council. (2001). Educating children with autism. National Academies Press.
35.
NeilN.JonesE. A. (2015). Studying treatment intensity: Lessons from two preliminary studies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-014-9208-6
O’NeillR.ReichleJ. (1993). Addressing socially motivated challenging behaviors by establishing communicative alternatives: Basics of a general case approach. In O’NeillR.ReichleJ. (Eds.), Communicative alternatives to challenging behavior: Integrating functional assessment and intervention strategies (pp. 205–236). Brookes Publishing.
38.
PereraC.Salamanca-SanabriaA.Caballero-BernalJ.FeldmanL.HansenM.BirdM.HansenP.DinesenC.Wiedemann VallièresF. (2020). No implementation without cultural adaptation: A process for culturally adapting low-intensity psychological interventions in humanitarian settings. Conflict and Health, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-020-00290-0
39.
ReichleJ.WackerD. P. (2017). Functional communication training for problem behavior. Guilford Publications.
40.
RingdahlJ. E.PeterC. S. (2017). Resurgence: The unintended maintenance of problem behavior. Education and Treatment of Children, 40(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2017.0002
41.
RomanczykR. G.CallahanE. H.TurnerL. B.CavalariR. N. (2014). Efficacy of behavioral interventions for young children with autism spectrum disorders: Public policy, the evidence base, and implementation parameters. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1(4), 276–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-014-0025-6
42.
RothschildL. B. (2018). Parental treatment acceptability of cognitive-behavioral interventions for children with neurodevelopmental disorders [Doctoral dissertation]. American University Digital Research Archive, American University. http://hdl.handle.net/1961/auislandora:70358
43.
SchreibmanL.DawsonG.StahmerA. C.LandaR.RogersS. J.McGeeG. G.KasariC.IngersollB.KaiserA. P.BruinsmaY.McNerneyE.WetherbyA.McNerneyE. (2015). Naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions: Empirically validated treatments for autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(8), 2411–2428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2407-8
44.
SmithT.LovaasI. O. (1998). Intensive and early behavioral intervention with autism: The UCLA young autism project. Infants & Young Children, 10(3), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0596-0
45.
Smith-LockK.LeitãoS.LambertL.PriorP.DunnA.CronjeJ.NewhouseS.NickelsL. (2013). Daily or weekly? The role of treatment frequency in the effectiveness of grammar treatment for children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(3), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2013.777851
46.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2009). Responsiveness-to-intervention and school-wide positive behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered system approaches. Exceptionality, 17(4), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830903235375
47.
TincaniM.CrozierS. (2007). Comparing brief and extended wait-time during small group instruction for children with challenging behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16(4), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-008-9063-4
48.
TothK.MunsonJ.MeltzoffA. N.DawsonG. (2006). Early predictors of communication development in young children with autism spectrum disorder: Joint attention, imitation, and toy play. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(8), 993–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0137-7
49.
Virués-OrtegaJ. (2010). Applied behavior analytic intervention for autism in early childhood: Meta-analysis, meta-regression and dose–response meta-analysis of multiple outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(4), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.008
50.
Virués-OrtegaJ.JulioF. M.Pastor-BarriusoR. (2013). The TEACCH program for children and adults with autism: A meta-analysis of intervention studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(8), 940–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.07.005
51.
VolkertV. M.LermanD. C.CallN. A.Trosclair-LasserreN. (2009). An evaluation of resurgence during treatment with functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(1), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-145
52.
WangM.LamY. (2017). Evidence-based practice in special education and cultural adaptations: Challenges and implications for research. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916685872
53.
WangM.McCartA.TurnbullA. P. (2007). Implementing positive behavior support for Chinese American families: Enhancing cultural competence. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007070090010501
54.
WarrenS. F.FeyM. E.YoderP. J. (2007). Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13(1), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20139
55.
YeatonW. H. Y.SechrestL. (1981). Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: Strength, integrity, and effectiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49(2), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.49.2.156
56.
YoderP.RogersS.EstesA.WarrenZ.MunsonJ.HellemannG.McEachinJ. (2020). Interaction of treatment intensity and autism severity on frequency and maturity of spontaneous communication in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 13(11), 1902–1912. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2416
57.
YoderP.WoynaroskiT.FeyM.WarrenS. (2014). Effects of dose frequency of early communication intervention in young children with and without Down syndrome. American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 119(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-119.1.17
58.
ZengB.LawJ.LindsayG. (2012). Characterizing optimal intervention intensity: The relationship between dosage and effect size in interventions for children with developmental speech and language difficulties. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14(5), 471–477. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2012.720281
