Young people who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) can experience reduced social participation and continue to face challenges in developing and using communication and literacy skills for real-life contexts. Drawing on emerging research, this discussion article highlights the potential benefits and advantages of participation in online conversations with peers as an additional support to both communication development and social participation for this group. Cross-Age peer e-mentoring to support participation in social media is proposed as a potential intervention strategy to enhance social participation and at the same time improve communicative competence and literacy for young people who use AAC.
Ahola KohutS.StinsonJ. N.RuskinD.ForgeronP.HarrisL.van WykM.. . . CampbellF. (2016). iPeer2Peer program: A pilot feasibility study in adolescents with chronic pain. Pain, 157, 1146–1155. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000496
BallinL.BalandinS.StancliffeR. (2012). The speech generating device (SGD)mentoring program: Supporting the development of people learning to use an SGD. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25, 437–459. doi:10.1007/s10882-012-9322-0
4.
BatorowiczB.CampbellF.Von TetzchnerS.KingG.MissiunaC. (2014). Social participation of school-aged children who use communication aids: The views of children and parents. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 237–251. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.940464
5.
BatorowiczB.McDougallS.ShepherdT. (2006). AAC and community partnerships: The participation path to community inclusion. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 178–195. doi:10.1080/07434610500468498
6.
BestP.ManktelowR.TaylorB. (2014). Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review. Children and Youth Services Review, 41, 27–36. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.001
7.
BeukelmanD. R.MirendaP. (2013). Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children & adults with complex communication needs. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
BlackstoneS.Hunt BergM. (2012). Social networks: A communication inventory for individuals with complex communication needs and their communication partners. Verona, WI: Attainment Company.
10.
BowkerN.TuffinK. (2007). Understanding positive subjectivities made possible online for disabled people. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 36, 63–71.
11.
BrusilovskiyE.TownleyG.SnethenG.SalzerM. S. (2016). Social media use, community participation and psychological well-being among individuals with serious mental illnesses. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 232–240. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.036
12.
CardosoG.AraújoV. (2009). Out of information and into communication. Networked communication and Internet usage. In CardosoG.CheongA.ColeJ. (Eds.), World wide internet: Changing societies, economies and cultures (pp. 23–50). Macau, China: University of Macau.
13.
CaronJ.LightJ. (2016). Social media experiences of adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 30–40. doi:10.3109/17549507.2016.1143970
14.
ChadwickD.WessonC. (2016). Digital inclusion and disability. In AtrillA.FullwoodC. (Eds.), Applied cyberpsychology: Practical applications of cyber-psychological theory and research (pp. 1–23). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
CohenK.LightJ. (2000). Use of electronic communication to develop mentor-protégé relationships between adolescent and adult AAC users: Pilot study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 227–238.
CostantinoM. A.BonatiM. (2014). A scoping review of interventions to supplement spoken communication for children with limited speech or language skills. PLoS ONE, 9, e90744. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090744
19.
DuboisD.HollowayB.ValentineJ.CooperH. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 157–197. doi:10.1023/A:1014628810714
20.
ErikssonU.HochwälderJ.CarlsundA.SellströmE. (2012). Health outcomes among Swedish children: The role of social capital in the family, school and neighborhood. Acta Paediatrica, 101, 513–517. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02579.x
21.
GanzJ. (2015). AAC interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 203–214. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1047532
22.
GraceE.RaghavendraP.NewmanL.WoodD.ConnellT. (2014). Learning to use the Internet and online social media: What is the effectiveness of home-based intervention for youth with complex communication needs?Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30, 141–157. doi:10.1177/0265659013518565
23.
HemsleyB.BalandinS.PalmerS.DannS. (2017). A call for innovative social media research in the field of augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 14–22. doi:10.1080/07434618.2016.1273386
24.
HemsleyB.MurrayJ. (2015). Distance and proximity: Research on social media connections in the field of communication disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37, 1509–1510. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1057031
25.
HynanA.GoldbartJ.MurrayJ. (2015). A grounded theory of Internet and social media use by young people who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Disability and Rehabilitation, 37, 1559–1575. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1056387
26.
ImmsC.AdairB.KeenD.UllenhagA.RosenbaumP.GranlundM. (2016). “Participation”: A systematic review of language, definitions, and constructs used in intervention research with children with disabilities. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 58, 29–38. doi:10.1111/dmcn.12932
27.
IndianM.GrieveR. (2014). When Facebook is easier than face-to-face: Social support derived from Facebook in socially anxious individuals. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 102–106. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.016
28.
KarcherM. (2014). Cross-age peer mentoring. In DuBoisD.KarcherM. (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (2nd ed., pp. 233–258). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
KingG.BatorowiczB.RigbyP.McMain-KleinM.ThompsonL.PintoM. (2014). Development of a measure to assess youth Self-Reported Experiences of Activity Settings (SEAS). International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 61, 44–66. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2014.878542
30.
LawM.BaptisteS.CarswellA.McCollM.PolatajkoH.PollockN. (2005). The Canadian occupational performance measure (4th ed.). Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists Publications.
31.
LightJ.McNaughtonD. (2015). Designing AAC research and intervention to improve outcomes for individuals with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 85–96. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1036458
32.
LightJ.McNaughtonD.KrezmanC.WilliamsM.GulensM.GalskoyA.UmplebyM. (2007). The AAC mentor project: Web-based instruction in sociorelational skills and collaborative problem solving for adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 56–75.
33.
PictonI.ClarkC. (2015). The impact of ebooks on the reading motivation and reading skills of children and young people: A study of schools using RM Books. London, England: National Literacy Trust.
34.
RackenspergerT.KrezmanC.McnaughtonD.WilliamsM.D’SilvaK. (2005). “When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off a cliff”: The challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies as described by adults who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 165–186. doi:10.1080/07434610500140360
RaghavendraP.OlssonC.SampsonJ.McInerneyR.ConnellT. (2012). School participation and social networks of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities, and typically developing peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 33–43. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.653604
37.
RhodesJ. (1994). Older and wiser: Mentoring relationships in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Primary Prevention, 14, 187–196. doi:10.1007/BF01324592
SchwartzS. E. O.RhodesJ. E.LiangB.SánchezB.SpencerR.KremerS.KanchewaS. (2014). Mentoring in the digital age: Social media use in adult–youth relationships. Children and Youth Services Review, 47, 205–213. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.09.004
40.
StewartM.BarnfatherA.Magill-EvansJ.RayL.LetourneauN. (2011). Brief report: An online support intervention: Perceptions of adolescents with physical disabilities. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 795–800. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.04.007
41.
StewartM.LetourneauN.MasudaJ.AndersonS.McGhanS. (2013). Impacts of online peer support for children with asthma and allergies: “It just helps you every time you can’t breathe well.”Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 28, 439–452. doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2013.01.003
42.
StinsonJ.Ahola KohutS.ForgeronP.AmariaK.BellM.KaufmanM.. . . SpiegelL. (2016). The iPeer2Peer program: A pilot randomized controlled trial in adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatric Rheumatology, 14, Article 48.
43.
SundqvistA.RönnbergJ. (2010). A qualitative analysis of email interactions of children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 255–266. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.528796
44.
TariqS.WoodmanJ. (2013). Using mixed methods in health research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Short Reports, 4, 1–8. doi:10.1177/2042533313479197
45.
TherrienM.LightJ.PopeL. (2016). Systematic review of the effects of interventions to promote peer interactions for children who use aided AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32, 81–93. doi:10.3109/07434618.2016.1146331
46.
WareP.RamosJ. (2013). First-generation college students: Mentoring through social media. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 2, 149–162. doi:10.1108/IJMCE-02-2013-0009
