Effects of an AAC App with Transition to Literacy Features on Single-Word Reading of Individuals with Complex Communication Needs

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of Transition to Literacy (T2L) software features (i.e., dynamic text and speech output upon selection of a graphic symbol) within a grid display in an augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) app on the single-word reading skills of five individuals with severe disabilities and complex communication needs. The study implemented a single-case multiple probe research design across one set of three participants. The same design was utilized with an additional set of two participants. During intervention, the T2L feature was activated for targeted words during a book reading activity. The dependent variable was the number of 10 target words correctly identified. With only limited exposure to the T2L feature, the five participants all demonstrated increased accuracy in identification of 10 target words. Four of the five participants generalized learning to use a text-only display for the 10 target words. This study provides preliminary evidence that redesigning AAC apps to include the provision of dynamic text combined with speech output can positively impact the single-word reading of participants. This adaptation in AAC system design could be used to support improved outcomes in both language and literacy.

Keywords

augmentative and alternative communication apps literacy severe disability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allor

J. H.

Champlin

T. M.

Gifford

D. B.

Mathes

P. G.

(2010). Methods for increasing the intensity of reading instruction for students with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(4), 500–511. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879756

Allor

J. H.

Chard

D. J.

(2011). A comprehensive approach to improving reading fluency for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 43(5), 1–12.

Alper

S. K.

(2003). An ecological approach to identifying curriculum content for inclusive settings. In Ryndak

D. L.

Alper

S. K.

(Eds.), Curriculum and instruction for students with significant disabilities in inclusive settings (pp. 73–85). Allyn & Bacon.

Browder

D. M.

Xin

Y. P.

(1998). A meta-analysis and review of sight word research and its implications for teaching functional reading to individuals with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 32(3), 130–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699803200301

Caron

J. G.

Light

(2017). Social media experiences of adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2016.1143970

Caron

J. G.

Light

Holyfield

McNaughton

(2018). Effects of dynamic text in an AAC app on sight word reading for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1457715

Copeland

S. R.

McCord

J. A.

Kruger

(2016). A review of literacy interventions for adults with extensive needs for supports. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.548

Didden

Prinsen

Sigafoos

(2000). The blocking effect of pictorial prompts on sight-word reading. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33(3), 317–320. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2000.33-317

Ehri

L. C.

(2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In Snowling

M. J.

Hulme

(Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135–154). Blackwell.

10.

Erickson

K. A.

Hatch

Clendon

(2010). Literacy, assistive technology, and students with significant disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v42i5.6904

11.

Etzel

B. C.

LeBlanc

J. M.

(1979). The simplest treatment alternative: The law of parsimony applied to choosing appropriate instructional control and errorless-learning procedures for the difficult-to-teach child. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9(9), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531445

12.

Fletcher

J. M.

Lyon

G. R.

Fuchs

L. S.

Barnes

M. A.

(2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. Guilford Press.

13.

Fossett

Mirenda

(2006). Sight word reading in children with developmental disabilities: A comparison of paired associate and picture-to-text matching instruction. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27(4), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2005.05.006

14.

Jagaroo

Wilkinson

(2008). Further considerations of visual cognitive neuroscience in aided AAC: The potential role of motion perception systems in maximizing design display. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701390673

15.

Light

McNaughton

(2013). Literacy intervention for individuals with complex communication needs. In Beukelman

D. R.

Mirenda

(Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (pp. 309–351). Brookes.

16.

Light

McNaughton

Caron

(2019). New and emerging AAC technology supports for children with complex communication needs and their communication partners: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1557251

17.

Light

McNaughton

Jakobs

Hershberger

(2014). Investigating AAC technologies to support the transition from graphic symbols to literacy. Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Augmentative and Alternative Communication. https://tinyurl.com/rerc-on-aac-T2L

18.

Mandak

Light

McNaughton

(2019). Digital books with dynamic text and speech output: Effects on sight word reading of preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(3), 1193–1204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3817-1

19.

Miles

K. P.

Rubin

G. B.

Gonzalez-Frey

(2017). Rethinking sight words. The Reading Teacher, 71(6), 715–726. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1658

20.

Parker

R. L.

Vannest

K. J.

Davis

J. L.

Sauber

S. B.

(2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006

21.

Proctor

Silmere

Raghavan

Hovmand

Aarons

Bunger

Griffey

Hensely

(2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7

22.

Roberts

T. A.

Christo

Shefelbine

J. A.

(2011). Word recognition. In Kamil

M. L.

Pearson

P. D.

Moje

E. B.

Afflerbach

P. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of reading research, volume IV (pp. 229–258). Routledge

23.

Saunders

R. J.

Solman

R. T.

(1984). The effect of pictures on the acquisition of a small vocabulary of similar sight-words. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1984.tb02590.x

24.

Schreibman

(1975). Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on discrimination learning in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1975.8-91

25.

Sheehy

(2002). The effective use of symbols in teaching word recognition to children with severe learning difficulties: A comparison of word alone, integrated picture cueing and the handle technique. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 49(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120120115325

26.

Sidman

Cresson

(1973). Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalences in severe retardation. Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77(5), 515–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395900

27.

Solman

R. T.

Singh

N. N.

Kehoe

E. J.

(1992). Pictures block the learning of sight words. Educational Psychology, 12(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341920120205

28.

Spector

J. E.

(2011). Sight word instruction for students with autism: An evaluation of the evidence base. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(10), 1411–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB