A secondary analysis of data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2) was conducted to examine predictors associated with improved postschool community participation of young adults with severe disabilities. Multidimensional item response theory was used to establish criterion and predictor constructs and examine predictive relationships between these constructs. Results identified two outcome constructs (community involvement, social engagement) and four predictors (functional skills, classroom behaviors, participation in social networks, access to vocational programs) establishing good model fit. Participation in social networks while in school was a strong predictor of both community involvement and social engagement. Functional skills of young adults predicted postschool community involvement. Implications for future research and practice promoting and supporting community participation are discussed.
AckermanT. A.GierlM. J.WalkerC. M. (2003). Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate educational and psychological tests. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22, 37-51.
2.
AllenD. D.WilsonM. (2006). Introducing multidimensional item response modeling in health behavior and health education research. Health Education Research, 21, 73-84. doi:10.1093/her/cyl086
3.
AmadoA. N.StancliffeR. J.McCarronM.McCallionP. (2013). Social inclusion and community participation of individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 360-375. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-51.5.360
4.
BalandinS. (2011). Participation by adults with lifelong disability: More than a trip to the bowling alley. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 207-217. doi:10.3109/17549507.2011.549569
5.
BigbyC.WieselI. (2011). Encounter as a dimension of social inclusion for people with intellectual disability: Beyond and between community presence and participation. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 36, 259-263. doi:10.3109/13668250.2011.619166
6.
BouckE. C. (2012). Secondary students with moderate/severe intellectual disability: Considerations of curriculum and postschool outcomes from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 1175-1186. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01517.x
7.
BraddockD.HempR.TanisE. S.WuJ.HafferL. (2017). The state of the states in intellectual and developmental disabilities (11th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
8.
BrownL.ShiragaB.KesslerK. (2006). The quest for ordinary lives: The integrated vocational functioning of 50 workers with significant disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 93-121. doi:10.1177/154079690603100202
9.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
CarterE. W. (2018). Supporting the social lives of secondary students with severe disabilities: Considerations for effective intervention. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 26, 52-61. doi:10.1177/1063426617739253
11.
CarterE. W.AustinD.TrainorA. A. (2011). Factors associated with the early work experiences of adolescents with severe disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 233-247. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-49.4.233
12.
CarterE. W.AustinD.TrainorA. A. (2012). Predictors of postschool employment outcomes for young adults with severe disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23, 50-63. doi:10.1177/1044207311414680
13.
CarterE. W.HarveyM. N.TaylorJ. L.GothamK. (2013). Connecting youth and young adults with autism spectrum disorders to community life. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 888-898. doi:10.1002/pits.21716
14.
CleaverS.Ouelette-KuntzH.SakarA. (2010). Participation in intellectual disability research: A review of 20 years of studies. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 187-193. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01256.x
15.
DeanE. E.FisherK. W.ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L. (2016). Participation and intellectual disability: A review of the literature. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 54, 427-439. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-54.6.427
16.
DiStefanoC. (2002). The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 327-346. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0903_2
17.
DorenB.GauJ. M.LindstromL. E. (2012). The relationship between parent expectations and postschool outcomes of adolescents with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 79, 7-23. doi:10.1177/001440291207900101
18.
FergusonD. L.FergusonP. M. (2006). The promise of adulthood. In SnellM. E.BrownF. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (6th ed., pp. 614-637). Boston, MA: Pearson.
19.
FisherK. W.ShogrenK. A. (2016). The influence of academic tracking on adolescent social networks. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 89-100. doi:10.1177/0741932515616758
20.
GrigalM.HartD.MiglioreA. (2011). Comparing the transition planning, postsecondary education, and employment outcomes of students with intellectual and other disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 4-17. doi:10.1177/0885728811399091
21.
HammelJ.MagasiS.HeinemannA.WhiteneckG.BognerJ.RodriguezE. (2008). What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 1445-1460. doi:10.1080/09638280701625534
22.
HochmanJ. M.CarterE. W.Bottema-BeutelK.HarveyM. N.GustafsonJ. R. (2015). Efficacy of peer networks to increase social connections among high school students with and without autism spectrum disorder. Exceptional Children, 82, 96-116. doi:10.1177/0014402915585482
23.
HowlinP. (2000). Outcome in adult life for more able individuals with autism or Asperger syndrome. Autism, 4, 63-83. doi:10.1177/1362361300004001005
24.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. §1414.
25.
JohnsonM. S. (2007). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item response models in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 20(10), 1-24. doi:10.18637/jss.v020.i10
26.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
LevasseurM.RichardL.GauvinL.RaymondÉ. (2010). Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: Proposed taxonomy of social activities. Social Science & Medicine, 71, 2141-2149. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.041
28.
LittleR. J.RubinD. B. (2002). Statistical analyses with missing data. New York, NY: John Wiley.
29.
MarveldeJ. M.GlasC. A.LandeghemG. V.DammeJ. V. (2006). Application of multidimensional item response theory models to longitudinal data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 5-34. doi:10.1177/0013164405282490
30.
McCarronM.SwinburneJ.BurkeE.McGlincheyE.MulryanN.AndrewsV.. . . McCallionP. (2011). Growing older with an intellectual disability in Ireland 2011: First results from the intellectual disability supplement of the Irish longitudinal study on ageing. Dublin, Ireland: School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin.
31.
MiglioreA.MankD.GrossiT.RoganP. (2007). Integrated employment of sheltered workshops: Preferences of adults with intellectual disabilities, their families, and staff. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 26, 5-19.
32.
MilnerP.KellyB. (2009). Community participation and inclusion: People with disabilities defining their place. Disability & Society, 24, 47-62. doi:10.1080/09687590802535410
33.
MyersF.AgerA.KerrP.MylesS. (1998). Outside looking in? Studies of the community integration of people with learning disabilities. Disability & Society, 13, 389-413. doi:10.1080/09687599826704
34.
O’BrienJ.BlessingC. (2011). Conversation on citizenship and person-centered work. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Inclusion Press.
35.
O’BrienJ.O’BrienC. L. (1990). Framework for accomplishment. Lithonia, GA: Responsive Systems Associates.
36.
OsteenP. (2010). An introduction to using multidimensional item response theory to assess latent factor structures. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1, 66-82. doi:10.5243/jsswr.2010.6
37.
RadermacherH.SonnC.KeysC.DuckettP. (2010). Disability and participation: It’s about us but still without us!Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20, 333-346. doi:10.1002/casp.1039
38.
ReckaseM. D. (2009). Multidimensional item response theory. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
39.
RoganP.WalkerP. M. (2007). Toward meaningful daytimes for adults with significant disabilities. In WalkerP. M.RoganP. (Eds.), Make the day matter! Promoting typical lifestyles for adults with significant disabilities (pp. 1-14). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
40.
ShattuckP. T.OrsmondG. O.WagnerM.CooperB. P. (2011). Participation in social activities among adolescents with an autism spectrum disorder. PLoS ONE, 6(11), e27176. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027176
41.
SimplicanS. C.LeaderG.KosciulekJ.LeahyM. (2015). Defining social inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An ecological model of social networks and community participation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 18-29. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.008
42.
SnellM. E.BrownF. (2006). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
43.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160-181. doi:10.1177/0885728809346960
44.
TintA.MaughanA. L.WeissJ. A. (2017). Community participation of youth with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 61, 168-180. doi:10.1111/jir.12311
45.
TrainorA. A. (2008). Using cultural and social capital to improve postsecondary outcomes and expand transition models for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 42, 148-162. doi:10.1177/0022466907313346
46.
TrainorA. A.MorningstarM. E.MurrayA.KimH. (2013). Social capital during the postsecondary transition for young adults with high incidence disabilities. The Prevention Researcher, 20, 7-10.
47.
WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.PalmerS. B.Williams-DiehmK. L.LittleT. D.BoultonA. (2012). The impact of the self-determined learning model of instruction on student self-determination. Exceptional Children, 78, 135-153. doi:10.1177/001440291207800201
48.
WhiteG. W.SimpsonJ. L.GondaC.RaveslootC.CobleZ. (2010). Moving from independence to interdependence: A conceptual model for better understanding community participation of centers for independent living consumers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 20, 232-240. doi:10.1177/1044207309350561
49.
WoodsC. M.EdwardsM. C. (2011). Factor analysis and related methods. In RaoC. R.MillerJ. P.RaoD. C. (Eds.), Essential statistical methods for medical statistics (pp. 174-198). Burlington, MA: North-Holland.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
