This article explores the benefits and challenges of operating an inclusive elementary and special education teacher preparation program within a disability studies framework. How does such a program balance issues of theory and practice? How does it provide students with a critical approach that essentially views disability as a social and cultural category much like race and gender, with a practical approach that attempts to address, remediate or eliminate those conditions that are considered disabling? How is it possible to become a successful professional with a disability studies perspective within a field such as special education that is traditionally based around a deficit model? The article provides recommendations for how such questions might be addressed in teacher education.
AshbyC. (2010). The trouble with normal: The struggle for meaningful access for middle school students with developmental disability labels.Disability & Society,25, 345–358.
2.
BaglieriS., ValleJ. W., ConnorD. J., & GallagherD. J. (2011). Disability studies in education: The need for a plurality of perspectives on disability.Remedial and Special Education,52(4), 267–278.
3.
BakerB. (2002). The hunt for disability: The new eugenics and the normalization of school children.Teachers College Record,104, 663–703.
BroderickA., ReidD. K., & ValleJ. W. (2007). Disability studies in education (DSE) and the practical concerns of teachers. In DanforthS., & GabelS. (Eds.), Disability studies in education.New York, NY: Peter Lang.
8.
Causton-TheoharisJ., TheoharisG., & TrezekB. (2008). Teaching pre-service teachers to design inclusive instruction: A lesson planning template.The International Journal of Inclusive Education,12, 381–399.
9.
ChamberlainS. P. (2006). An interview with Alfredo Artiles and Beth Harry: Issues of overrepresentation and educational equity for culturally and linguistically diverse students.Intervention in School and Clinic,41, 228–232.
10.
ConnorD. J. (2010). Adding urban complexities into the mix: Continued resistance to the inclusion of students with cognitive impairments (or New York, New York: So bad they segregated it twice.) In SmithP. (Ed.), Whatever happened to inclusion? The place of students with intellectual disabilities in education (pp. 157–187). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
11.
ConnorD. J., GabelS. L., GallagherD. J., & MortonM. (2008). Disability studies and inclusive education—Implications for theory, research and practice.International Journal of Inclusive Education,12, 441–457.
12.
DavisL. (1997). Constructing normalcy: The bell curve, the novel, and the invention of the disabled body in the nineteenth centurv. In DavisL. (Ed.). The disability studies reader (pp. 9–28). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
DouglasM. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of purity and taboo.New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
ErevellesN. (2002). (Im)Material citizens: Cognitive disability, race, and the politics of citizenship.Disability, Culture and Education,1, 5–25.
15.
FerriB. A., & ConnorD. J. (2005). Tools of exclusion: Race, disability, and (re)segregated education.Teachers College Record,107, 453–474.
16.
FriendM. (2008). Special education: Contemporary perspectives for school professionals.Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
17.
GabelS. (2005). Disability studies in education: Readings in theory and method.New York. NY: Peter Lang.
18.
GabelS., & DanforthS. (2002). Disability studies in education: Seizing the moment of opportunity.Disability, Culture and Education.1, 1–3.
19.
GallagherD. J. (2005). Searching for something outside of ourselves: The contradiction between technical rationality and the achievement of inclusive pedagogy. In GabelS. L. (Ed.), Disability studies in education: Readings in theory and method (pp. 139–154). New York. NY: Peter Lang.
20.
HahnH. (1997). New trends in disability studies: Implications for educational policy. In LipskyD. K., & GartnerA. (Eds.), Inclusion and school reform: Transforming America's classrooms (pp. 315–328). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
21.
HehirT. (2002). Eliminating ableism in education.Harvard Educational Review,72, 1–32.
22.
HehirT. (2005). New directions in special education: Eliminating ableism in policy and practice.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press Publishing.
23.
KliewerC. (1998). Schooling children with Down syndrome: Toward an understanding of possibility.New York, NY: Teacher's College Press.
24.
LintonS. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity.New York. NY: UP.
25.
LongmoreP., & UmanskyL. (2001). The new disability history: American perspectives.New York, NY: NYU Press.
26.
MackayR. (2003). “Tell them who I was”: The social construction of aphasia.Disability and Society,18, 811–826.
27.
MeyerL. H., MagerG. M., Yarger-KaneG., SarnoM., & Hext-ContrerasG.. (1997). Syracuse University's inclusive elementary and special education program. In BlantonL. P., GriffinC. C., WinnJ. A., & PugachM. C. (Eds.), Teacher education in transition: Collaborative programs to prepare general and special educators (pp. 18–38). Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company.
28.
MutuaK., & SmithR. (2006). Disrupting normalcy and the practical concerns of classroom teachers. In DanforthS., & GabelS. (Eds.), Vital questions facing disability studies in education (pp. 121–132). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
29.
Ong-DeanC. (2009). Distinguishing disability: Parents, privilege and special education.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
OylerC. (2011). Teacher preparation the inclusion and critical (special) education.Teacher Education and Special Education,34(3), 201–218.
31.
PetersS., & ReidD. K. (2009). Resistance and discursive practice: Promoting advocacy in teacher undergraduate and graduate programmes.Teaching and Teacher Education,25, 551–558.
32.
RauscherL., & McClintockM. (1997). Ableism in curriculum design. In AdamsM., BellL., & GriffinP. (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice: A sourcebook (pp. 198–230). New York, NY: Routledge.
RoseD. A., MeyerA., & HitchbockC. (2005). The universally designed classroom: Accessible curriculum and digital technologies.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
35.
ShapiroA. (2000). Everybody belongs: Changing negative attitudes toward classmates with disabilities.New York, NY: Rutledge Falmer.
36.
SmithT. E. G., PollowayE. A., PattonJ. A., & DowdyC. A. (2008). Teaching students with special needs in inclusive settings.Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
37.
Syracuse University School of Education. (2009). Accreditation report to the Council for Exceptional Children Specialized Professional Association.Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University School of Education.
ThomsonR. G. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature.New York. NY: Columbia University Press.
40.
WareL. P. (2003). Working past pity: What we make of disability in schools. In AllenJ. (Ed.), Inclusion, participation and democracy (pp. 117–137). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
41.
WendellS. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of disability.Hypatia,4, 104–124.
42.
YoungK. S. (2008). Physical and social organization of space in a combined credential programme: Implications for inclusion.International Journal of Inclusive Education,12, 477–495.
