The academic field of disability studies has expanded rapidly over the last two decades or so. With that expansion has also come some growing ambiguity about exactly what is meant by the term “disability studies.” This article reviews the history and evolution of disability studies as an interdisciplinary approach to research and scholarship. While acknowledging the broad range of interests and approaches that can fall under the umbrella of the “disability studies” label, we argue that it may be useful to present a set of core themes or beliefs that seem central to disability studies as a field if it is to fulfill its promise as a truly different way of exploring the meanings of disability in society. Finally, we argue that disability studies should be of special interest to members of TASH and others with particular interest in the lives of people with significant intellectual and developmental disabilities.
AllanJ. (2008). Rethinking inclusive education: The philosophers of difference in practice.The Netherlands: Springer.
2.
AnastasiouD., & KauffmanJ. M. (2011). A social constructionist approach to disability: Implications for special education.Exceptional Children,77, 367–384.
3.
AndrewsJ. E., CarnineD. W., CoutinhoM. J., EdgarE. B., FornessS. R., FuchsL. S. (2000). Bridging the special education divide.Remedial and Special Education.21, 258–260.
4.
ArtilesA. J. (2003). Special education's changing identity: Paradoxes and dilemmas in view of culture and space.Harvard Educational Review.73, 164–202.
5.
BaglieriS., ValleJ. W., ConnorD. J., & GallagherD. J. (2010). Disability studies in education: The need for a plurality of perspectives on disability.Remedial and Special Education. Published online March 5, 2010. DOI: 10.1177/0741932510362200
6.
BartonL. (1996). Sociology and disability: Some emerging issues. In BartonL. (Ed.), Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights (pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Longman.
7.
BayntonD. C. (2001). Disability and the justification of inequality in American history. In LongmoreP. K., & UmanskyL. (Eds.), The new disability history: American perspectives (pp. 33–57). New York, NY: New York University Press.
8.
BerubéM. (1996). Life as we know it: A father, a family, and an exceptional child.New York, NY: Pantheon.
9.
BiklenD. (2007). A disability studies frame for inclusion education. Paper presented at Second City Conference on Disability Studies in Education, Chicago, IL.
10.
BiklenD., & BogdanR. (1977). Media portrayals of disabled people: A study in stereotypes.Interracial Books for Children Bulletin,8, 6–7.
11.
BiklenD., & BurkeJ. (2006). Presuming competence.Equity and Excellence in Education,39, 166–175.
BogdanR., & TaylorS. (1976). The judged, not the judges: An insider's view of mental retardation.American Psychologist,31, 47–52.
14.
BrantlingerE. A. (1997). Using ideology: Cases of nonrecognition of the politics of research and practice in special education.Review of Educational Research,67, 425–459. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.
15.
BrantlingerE. A. (2006). Who benefits from special education? Remediating (fixing) other people's children.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16.
CareyA. C. (2009). On the margins of citizenship: Intellectual disability and civil rights in twentieth-century America.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
17.
CollinsK. M. (2003). Ability profiling and school failure: One child's struggle to be seen as competent.New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
ConnorD. J. (2009). Creating cartoons as representation: Visual narratives of college students with disabilities.Educational Media International,46, 185–205.
19.
ConnorD. J. (2010, April). Diversifying “diversity”: Contemplating dis/ability at the table(s) of social justice and multicultural education. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
20.
ConnorD. J. (2011). Questioning “normal”: Seeing children first and labels second.School Talk: Between the Ideal and the Real World of Teaching,16, 1–3.
21.
ConnorD. J., GabelS. L., GallagherD. J., & MortonM. (2008). Disability studies and inclusive education—Implications for theory, research, and practice.International Journal of Inclusive Education.12, 441–457.
22.
CrutchfieldS., & EpsteinM. (Eds.) (2000). Points of contact: Disability, art, and culture.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
23.
CushingP., & SmithT. (2009). A multinational review of English-language disability studies degrees and courses.Disability Studies Quarterly,29. Retrieved August 9, 2009, from http://www.dsq-sds.org/issue/view/41.
24.
DanforthS., & GabelS. L. (Eds.) (2006). Vital questions facing disability studies in education.New York, NY: Peter Lang.
25.
DavisL. (Ed.) (2010). The disability studies reader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
DevliegerP., RuschF., & PfeifferD. (Eds.) (2003). Rethinking disability: The emergence of new definitions, concepts and communities.Philadelphia. PA: Garant Press.
27.
DochcrtyD., HughesR., PhillipsP., CorbettD., ReganB., BarberA., & IzzidienS.. (2005). This is what we think. In GoodleyD., & Van HoveG. (Eds.), Another disability studies reader? (pp. 29–49). Philadelphia, PA: Garant.
28.
EdgertonR. B. (1967). The cloak of competence: Stigma in the lives of the mentally retarded.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
29.
FergusonP. M. (2009). The doubting dance: Contributions to a history of parent/professional interactions in early 20th century America.Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities,33, 48–58.
30.
FergusonP. M., & AschA. (1988). Lessons from life: Personal and parental perspectives on school, childhood, and disability. In BiklenD. P., FergusonD. L., & FordA. (Eds.), Schooling and disability: Eighty-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part II (pp. 108–140). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
FergusonP. M., FergusonD. L., & TaylorS. J. (1992). Conclusion: The future of interpretivism in disability studies. In FergusonP. M., FergusonD. L., & TaylorS. J. (Eds.), Interpreting disability: A qualitative reader (pp. 295–302). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
32.
FineM., & AschA. (Eds.) (1988). Women with disabilities: Essays in psychology, culture, and politics.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
33.
FingerA. (2006). Elegy for a disease: A personal and cultural history of polio.New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
34.
FriesK. (Ed.) (1997). Staring back: The disability experience from the inside out.New York, NY: Plume Books.
35.
GabbardC. (2011). Odd quirks. In MarotteM. R., ReynoldsP. M., & SavareseR. J. (Eds.), Papa PhD: Essays on fatherhood by men in the academy (pp. 217–223). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
36.
GabelS. L. (Ed.) (2005). Disability studies in education: Readings in theory and method.New York, NY: Peter Lang.
37.
Garland-ThomsonR. (2009). Staring: How we look.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
GoffmanE. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates.New York, NY: Doubleday.
39.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40.
GoodleyD., & LawthomR. (2006). Preface. In GoodleyD., & LawthomR. (Eds.), Disability and psychology: Critical introductions and reflections (pp. xv–xvii). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
GrahamL. J., & SleeR. (2008). Inclusion? In GabelS. L., & DanforthS. (Eds.), Disability and the politics of education: An international reader (pp. 81–100). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
HarryB., & KlingnerJ. (2006). Why are so many minority students in special education?: Understanding race and disability in schools.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
44.
HeshusiusL. (2004). The Newtonian mechanistic paradigm, special education, and contours of alternatives: An overview. In GallagherD., HeshusiusL., IanoR. P., & SkrticT. M. (Eds.), Challenging orthodoxy in special education: Dissenting voices (pp. 29–59). Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
45.
HeveyD. (1992). The creatures time forgot: Photography and disability imagery.London, UK: Routledge.
46.
HillyerB. (1993). Feminism and disability.Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
47.
JohnsonH. M. (2005). Too late to die young: Nearly true tales from a life.New York, NY: Henry Holt.
48.
KigerG., & HeyS. C. (Eds.) (1989). Emerging issues in impairment and disability studies.Salem, OR: The Society for Disability Studies and Willamette University.
49.
KittayE. F. (1999). Love's labor: Essays in women, equality and dependency.New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
KittayE. F., & CarlsonL. (Eds.) (2010). Cognitive disability and its challenge to moral philosophy.Maldon, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
51.
KudlickC. J. (2003). Disability history: Why we need another “other.”American Historical Review, 108, 763–793.
52.
LintonS. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity.New York, NY: New York University Press.
53.
LintonS. (2006). My body politic: A memoir.Ann Arbor. MI: University of Michigan Press.
54.
LongmoreP. K., & UmanskyL. (Eds.) (2001). The new disability history: American perspectives.New York, NY: New York University Press.
55.
LosenD. J., & OrfieldG. (Eds.) (2002). Racial inequity in special education.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
LubetA. (2010). Music, disability, and society.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
57.
McRuerR. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability.New York, NY: New York University Press.
Mintz (Nusbaum)E. (2009). Vulnerable to exclusion: A disability studies perspective on practices in an inclusive school (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
60.
MitchellD. T., & SnyderS. L. (2000). Narrative prosthesis: Disability and the dependencies of discourse.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
61.
MolinaN. (2006). Medicalizing the Mexican: Immigration, race, and disability in the early-twentieth-century United States.Radical History Review,94, 22–37.
62.
NusbaumE., & RodriguezJ. (2010, March). Using a capacity-building perspective to redefine student “problems.” Paper presented at the meeting of the California Chapter of TASH, Burlingame, CA.
63.
O'BrienP., & SullivanM. (Eds.) (2005). Allies in emancipation: Shifting from providing service to being of support.South Melbourne, Australia: Thomson Dunmore Press.
64.
OliverM. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production.Disability, Handicap & Society,7, 101–114.
65.
OliverM. (1993). Re-defining disability: A challenge to research. In SwainJ., FinkelsteinV., FrenchS., & OliverM. (Eds.), Disabling barriers—enabling environments (pp. 61–67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
SandahlC., & AuslanderP. (2005). Bodies in commotion: Disability and performance.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
67.
SavareseR. (2007). Reasonable people: A memoir of autism and adoption.New York, NY: Other Press.
68.
SchrinerK. (2001). A disability studies perspective on employment issues and policies for disabled people. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 642–662). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
SeelmanK. D. (2001). Science and technology: Is disability a missing factor? In AlbrechtG. L., SeelmanK. D., & BuryM. (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 663–692). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70.
ShakespeareT. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs.New York, NY: Routledge.
71.
ShapiroJ. P. (1993). No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement.New York, NY: Times Books.
72.
SherryM. (2006). If only I had a brain: Deconstructing brain injury.New York, NY: Routledge.
73.
SiebersT. (2008). Disability theory.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
74.
SleeR. (1997). Imported or important theory? Sociological interrogations of disablement and special education.British Journal of Sociology of Education,18, 407–419. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.
75.
SleeR. (2001). Social justice and the changing directions in educational research: The case of inclusive education.International Journal of Inclusive Education,5, 173–191.
76.
SleeR., & AllanJ. (2001). Excluding the included: A reconsideration of inclusive education.International Studies in Sociology of Education,11, 173–191.
77.
SmithT. J. (2007). Teaching the children we fear: Stories from the front.Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.
78.
SnyderS. L., BrueggemannB. J., & Garland-ThomsonR. (Eds.) (2002). Disability studies: Enabling the humanities.New York, NY: Modern Language Association of America.
TaylorS. J. (2006). Before it had a name: Exploring the historical roots of disability studies in education. In DanforthS., & GabelS. L. (Eds.), Vital questions facing disability studies in education (pp. xiii–xxiii). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
ThomasC. (1999). Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability.Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
83.
ValleJ. W. (2009). What mothers say about special education from the 1960's to the present.New York, NY.: Palgrave Macmillan.
84.
ValleJ. W., & ConnorD. J. (2011). Rethinking disability: A disability studies approach to inclusive practices.New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
85.
WalzerM. (1987). Interpretation and social criticism.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
86.
WareL. (2001). Writing, identity and the other: Dare we do disability studies?Journal of Teacher Education,52, 107–123.
87.
WareL. (2003). Working past pity: What we make of disability in schools. In AllanJ. (Ed.), Inclusion, participation, and democracy: What is the purpose? (pp. 117–137).
88.
WareL. (2005). Many possible futures, man different directions: Merging critical special education and disability studies. In GabelS. L. (Ed.), Disability studies in education: Readings in theory and method (pp. 103–124). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
89.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavioral analysis is finding its heart.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis,11.203–214.
90.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: Short version.Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
91.
YoungK. S., & MintzE. A. (2008). A comparison: Difference, dependency, and stigmatization in special education and disability studies. In GabelS., & DanforthS. (Eds.), Disability and the politics of education (pp. 499–515). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
92.
ZolaI. K. (1982a). Missing pieces: A chronicle of living with a disability.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
93.
ZolaI. (Ed.) (1982b). Ordinary lives: Voices of disability and disease.Cambridge, MA: Applewood Press.
