Promoting access to the general curriculum for students with disabilities has emerged as a central theme of recent legislative and policy initiatives. Ensuring that students with severe disabilities benefit fully from the myriad learning and social opportunities available through the general curriculum remains an important challenge, particularly at the secondary level. We discuss peer support interventions, a form of peer-mediated intervention, as an effective approach for engaging youth with severe disabilities more meaningfully in the general curriculum, as well as promoting academic success for classmates serving as peer supports. We describe the core elements of these interventions, review research pertaining to the academic and social benefits available to participating students, and discuss factors that may account for the effectiveness and social acceptability of this intervention approach.
BroerS. M.DoyleM. B.GiangrecoM. F. (2005). Perspectives of students with intellectual disabilities about their experiences with paraprofessional support. Exceptional Children, 71, 415–430.
2.
BrowderD.FlowersC.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.KarvonenM.SpoonerF.AlgozzineR. (2004). The alignment of alternative assessment content with academic and functional curricula. Journal of Special Education, 37, 211–223.
3.
BrowderD. M.WallaceT.SnellM. E.KleinertH. (2005). The use of progress monitoring with students with significant cognitive disabilities: A white paper prepared for the National Center on Student Progress Monitoring. Washington, DC: National Center on Student Progress Monitoring.
4.
BrownB. B. (2004). Adolescents' relationships with peers. In LernerR. M.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 363–394). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
CarterE. W.CushingL. S.ClarkN. M.KennedyC. H. (2005). Effects of peer support interventions on students' access to the general curriculum and social interactions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 15–25.
6.
CarterE. W.HughesC. (2005). Increasing social interaction among adolescents with intellectual disabilities and their general education peers: Effective interventions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 179–193.
7.
CarterE. W.HughesC.GuthC.CopelandS. R. (2005). Factors influencing social interaction among high school students with intellectual disabilities and their general education peers. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110, 366–377.
8.
CarterE. W.PeksoM. (2007). Social validity of peer interaction intervention strategies in inclusive high school classrooms: Effectiveness, feasibility, and actual use. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9.
CollinsB. C.BransonT. A.HallM.RankinS. W. (2001). Teaching secondary students with moderate disabilities in an inclusive academic classroom setting. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 13, 41–59.
10.
CopelandS. R.HughesC.CarterE. W.GuthC.PresleyJ.WilliamsC. R. (2004). Increasing access to general education: Perspectives of participants in a high school peer support program. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 342–352.
11.
CushingL. S.ClarkN.CarterE. W.KennedyC. H. (2003). Peer supports and access to the general education curriculum. TASH Connections, 29, 8–11.
12.
CushingL. S.ClarkN. M.CarterE. W.KennedyC. H. (2005). Access to the general education curriculum for students with severe disabilities: What it means and how to accomplish it. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 6–13.
13.
CushingL. S.KennedyC. H. (1997). Academic effects of providing peer support in general education classrooms on students without disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 139–152.
14.
DowningJ. E. (2005). Inclusive education for high school students with severe intellectual disabilities: Supporting communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 132–148.
15.
DuganE.KampsD.LeonardB.WatkinsN.RheinbergerA.StackhausJ. (1995). Effects of cooperative learning groups during social studies for students with autism and fourth-grade peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 175–188.
16.
FarlowL. J.SnellM. E. (1989). Teacher use of student performance data to make instructional decisions: Practices in programs for students with moderate to profound disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 13–22.
17.
FisherD. (1999). According to their peers: Inclusion as high school students see it. Mental Retardation, 37, 458–467.
18.
GerberS. B.FinnJ. D.AchillesC. M.Boyd-ZahariasJ. (2001). Teacher aides and students' academic achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 123–143.
19.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M. (2005). Questionable utilization of paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: Are we addressing symptoms or causes?Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 10–26.
20.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M.EdelmanS. W. (2001). Teacher engagement with students with disabilities: Differences based on paraprofessional service delivery models. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 75–86.
21.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.BroerS. M. (2001). Respect, appreciation, and acknowledgement of paraprofessionals who support students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67, 485–498.
22.
GiangrecoM. F.HalvorsenA.DoyleM. B.BroerS. M. (2004). Alternatives to overreliance on paraprofessionals in inclusive schools. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 17, 82–90.
23.
GilbertsG. H.AgranM.HughesC.WehmeyerM. (2001). The effects of peer delivered self-monitoring strategies on the participation of students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 25–36.
24.
GoldsteinH.KaczmarekL. A.EnglishK. M. (2002). Promoting social communication: Children with developmental disabilities from birth to adolescence. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
25.
GreenwoodC. R.AbbottM. (2001). The research to practice gap in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 276–289.
26.
HaringT. G.BreenC. G. (1992). A peer-mediated social network intervention to enhance the social integration of persons with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 319–333.
27.
HemmingssonH.BorellL.GustavssonA. (2003). Participation in school: School assistants creating opportunities and obstacles for pupils with disabilities. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 23, 88–98.
28.
HendricksonJ. M.Shokoohi-YektaM.Hamre-NietupskiS.GableR. A. (1996). Middle and high school students' perceptions on being friends with peers with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 19–28.
29.
HughesC.CopelandS. R.GuthC.RungL. L.HwangB.KleebG. (2001). General education students' perspectives on their involvement in a high school peer buddy program. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 343–356.
30.
HughesC.LordenS. W.ScottS. V.HwangB.DererK. R.RodiM. S. (1998). Identification and validation of critical conversational social skills. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 431–446.
31.
HuntP.StaubD.AlwellM.GoetzL. (1994). Achievement by all students within the context of cooperative learning groups. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 290–301.
32.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 1997, 120 U.S.C. §1400 et seq.
33.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. 108–446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
34.
KampsD. M.BarbettaP. M.LeonardB. R.DelquadriJ. (1994). Classwide peer tutoring: An integration strategy to improve reading skills and promote peer interactions among students with autism and general education peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 49–61.
35.
KennedyC. H. (2002). The maintenance of behavior as an indicator of social validity. Behavior Modification, 26, 594–606.
36.
KennedyC. H. (2004). Research on social relationships. In EmersonE.HattonC.ParamenterT.ThompsonT. (Eds.), International handbook of applied research in intellectual disabilities (pp. 297–310). London: Wiley.
37.
KennedyC. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
38.
KennedyC. H.CushingL. S.ItkonenT. (1997). General education participation improves the social contacts and friendship networks of students with severe disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 167–189.
39.
KennedyC. H.ItkonenT. (1994). Some effects of regular class participation on the social contacts and social networks of high school students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 1–10.
40.
KennedyC. H.ShuklaS.FryxellD. (1997). Comparing the effects of educational placement on the social relationships of intermediate school students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 31–47.
41.
KlingnerJ. K.AhweeS.PilonietaP.MenendezR. (2003). Barriers and facilitators in scaling up research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 69, 411–429.
42.
MaheadyL.HarperG. F.MalletteB. (2001). Peermediated instruction and interventions and students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 4–14.
43.
MarderC.WagnerM.SumiC. (2003). The social adjustment of youth with disabilities. In WagnerM.MarderC.BlackorbyJ.CametoR.NewmanL.LevineP. (Eds.), The achievements of youth with disabilities during secondary school. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
44.
MarksS. U.SchraderC.LevineM. (1999). Paraeducator experiences in inclusive settings: Helping, hovering, or holding their own?Exceptional Children, 65, 315–328.
45.
McConnellS. R. (2002). Interventions to facilitate social interaction for young children with autism: Review of available research and recommendations for educational intervention and future research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 351–372.
46.
McDonnellJ.Mathot-BucknerC.ThorsonN.FisterS. (2001). Supporting the inclusion of students with moderate and severe disabilities in junior high general education classes: The effects of classwide peer tutoring, multi-element curriculum, and accommodations. Education & Treatment of Children, 24, 141–160.
47.
McDonnellJ.ThorsonN.AllenC.Mathot-BucknerC. (2000). The effects of partner learning during spelling for students with severe disabilities and their peers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 107–121.
48.
McSheehanM.SonnenmeierR. M.JorgensenC. M.TurnerK. (2006). Beyond communication access: Promoting learning of the general curriculum by students with significant disabilities. Topics in Language Disorders, 26, 266–290.
49.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, PL 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
50.
OdomS. L.BrownW. H.FreyT.KarasuN.Smith-CanterL. L.StrainP. S. (2003). Evidence-based practices for young children with autism: Contributions for single-subject design research. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 18, 166–175.
51.
President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
52.
SandallS. R.SchwartzI. S.LacroixB. (2004). Interventionists' perspectives about data collection in integrated early childhood classrooms. Journal of Early Intervention, 26, 161–174.
53.
ShuklaS.KennedyC. H.CushingL. S. (1998). Component analysis of peer support strategies: Adult influence on the participation of peers without disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 397–413.
54.
ShuklaS.KennedyC. H.CushingL. S. (1999). Intermediate school students with severe disabilities: Supporting their social participation in general education classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 130–140.
55.
SkärL.TammM. (2001). My assistant and I: Disabled children's and adolescents' roles and relationships to their assistants. Disability & Society, 16, 917–931.
56.
SutherlandK. S.WehbyJ. H. (2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic and behavioral outcomes of students with EBD: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 113–121.
57.
UtleyC. A.MortweetS. L. (1997). Peer-mediated instruction and interventions. Focus on Exceptional Children, 29, 1–23.
58.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP.MarderC. (2003). Going to school: Instructional contexts, programs, and participation of secondary school students with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
59.
WehmeyerM. L.LattinD. L.Lapp-RinckerG.AgranM. (2003). Access to the general curriculum of middle school students with mental retardation: An observational study. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 262–272.
60.
WehmeyerM. L.LanceG. D.BashinskiS. (2002). Promoting access to the general curriculum for students with mental retardation: A decision-making model. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 329–344.
61.
WehmeyerM. L.SandsD. J.KnowltonE.KozleskiE. B. (2002). Teaching students with mental retardation: Providing access to the general curriculum. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
