BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.WakemanS.TrelaK.BakerJ. N. (2006). Aligning instruction with academic content standards: Finding the link. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 309–321.
2.
CarterE. W.CushingL. S.ClarkN. M.KennedyC. H. (2005). Effects of peer support interventions on students' access to the general curriculum and social interactions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 15–25.
3.
CarterE. W.HughesC. (2006). Including high school students with severe disabilities in general education classes: Perspectives of general and special educators, paraprofessionals and administrators. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities31, 174–185.
4.
CarterE. W.KennedyC. H. (2006). Promoting access to general curriculum using peer support strategies. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 284–292.
5.
DowningJ. E.SpencerS.CavallaroC. (2004). The development of an inclusive charter elementary school: Lessons learned. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities29, 11–24.
6.
DymondS. K.RenzagliaA.RosensteinA.ChunE. J.BanksR. A.NiswanderV. (2006). Using a participatory action research approach to create a universally designed inclusive high school science course: A case study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 293–308.
7.
FisherM.MeyerL. H. (2002). Development and social competence after two years enrolled in inclusive and self- contained educational programs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 27, 165–174.
8.
ForemanP.Arthur-KellyM.PascoeS.KingB. S. (2004). Evaluating the educational experiences of students with profound and multiple disabilities in inclusive and segregated classroom settings: Australian perspective. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 29, 183–193.
9.
FriendM.CookL. (2007). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
10.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M. (2005). Questionable utilization of paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: Are we addressing symptoms or causes?Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 10–26.
11.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.BroerS. M. (2001). Respect, appreciation, and acknowledgement of paraprofessionals who support students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67, 485–498.
12.
GiangrecoM. F.HalvorsenA.DoyleM. B.BroerS. M. (2004). Alternatives to overreliance on paraprofessionals in inclusive schools. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 17, 82–90.
13.
HaringT. G.BreenC. G. (1992). A peer-mediated social network intervention to enhance the social integration of persons with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 319–333.
14.
HuntP.Farron-DavisF.BecksteadS.CurtisD.GoetzL. (1994). Evaluating the effects of placement of students with severe disabilities in general education versus special education classes. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 200–214.
15.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, 120 U.S.C. ŝ1400 et seq.
16.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, 115 Stat.1425 (2002).
17.
SassoG. M.HughesG. G.SwansonH. L.NovakC. G. (1987). A comparison of peer initiation interventions in promoting multiple peer initiators. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 22, 150–162.
18.
StaubD.HuntP. (1993). The effects of social interaction training on high school peer tutors of schoolmates with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 60, 41–57.