This study examines the application of workforce reduction strategies in the context of Chinese government reforms, with particular attention on the types of strategies employed and the factors that influence them. The strategies investigated include introducing attrition activities, encouraging early retirement and laying off employees. The study first provides a review of key issues in the literature on workforce reduction within government reform, as well as the historical development of Chinese downsizing reforms. The study then explains the research data and analytical techniques used to evaluate the relative importance and implementation measures of each strategy and examining influential factors to their use. The analytical findings indicate attrition as the most preferred strategy, while emphasizing specific concerns for implementing layoffs and early retirement. The study concludes with discussions about lessons learned from the workforce reduction experience in Chinese reforms and their implications for the broader literature on government reforms.
AndersenS. C.MortensenP. B. (2010). Policy stability and organizational performance: Is there a relationship?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 1–22.
2.
AngY. Y. (2012). Counting cadres: A comparative view of the size of China’s public employment. The China Quarterly, 211, 676–696.
3.
ArapisT.ChatterjeeV. (2024). Analysing cutback management strategies amidst the Covid 19 pandemic: Insights from Pennsylvania municipalities. Public Money & Management, 45, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2024.2305681.
4.
Armstrong-StassenM. (2005). Coping with downsizing: A comparison of executive-level and middle managers. International Journal of Stress Management, 12(2), 117–141.
5.
BaoY.ZhongW. (2021). Work values of Chinese MPA students: Underlying dimensions and group difference. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(7), 547–556.
6.
BoonJ.WynenJ. (2022) When are organizational reforms perceived positively? An examination of the role of employees’ hierarchical level. Public Management Review, 24(4), 579–600.
7.
BrienS.EgerR.III.MatkinD. (2021). The timing of managerial responses to fiscal stress. Public Administration Review, 81, 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13359
8.
BrødsgaardK. E. (2002). Institutional reform and the Bianzhi system in China. The China Quarterly, 170, 361–386.
9.
BrudneyJ. L.HebertF. T.WrightD. S. (1999). Reinventing government in the American states: Measuring and explaining administrative reform. Public Administration Review, 59(1), 19–30.
10.
BurnsJ. P. (2003). “Downsizing” the Chinese state: Government retrenchment in the 1990s. The China Quarterly, 175, 775–802.
11.
CameronK. S. (1994). Strategies for successful organizational downsizing. Human Resource Management, 33(2), 189–211.
ChristensenT.LishengD.PainterM. (2008). Administrative reform in China’s central government: How much ‘learning from the West’?International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(3), 351–371.
16.
FlinkC.XuX. (2023). Cutback management strategies and citizen evaluation of government. Public Administration, 102, 715–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12947
17.
FlinkC.XuX. (2024). Cutback management: Strategy, blame attribution, and evaluation of government. Public Budgeting & Finance, 44(3), 3-21.
18.
FlinkC. M. (2018). Ordering chaos: The performance consequences of budgetary changes. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(4), 291–300.
GarnautR.SongL.YaoY. (2006). Impact and significance of state-owned enterprise restructuring. The China Journal, 55, 35–65.
21.
GoreA. (1993). From red tape to results: Creating a government that works netter and costs less. A Report of the National Performance Review. U.S. Government Printing Office.
HeydenM.FournéS.KoeneB.AnsariS. (2017). Rethinking ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ roles of top and middle managers in organizational change: Implications for employee support. Journal of Management Studies, 54(7), 961–985.
24.
HornestayD. (1999). The human factor (pp. 1–10). Government Executive.
IvonchykM. (2025). U.S. State budget management strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Global Public Policy and Governance, 4, 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-024-00107-3
27.
JonesV. D. (1998). Downsizing the federal government: The management of public sector workforce reductions. M. E. Sharpe.
28.
JuenkeE. G. (2005). Management tenure and network time: How experience affects bureaucratic dynamics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 113–131.
29.
JungC. S. (2013). Navigating a rough terrain of public management: Examining the relationship between organizational size and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(3), 663–686.
KearneyR. C.FeldmanB. M.ScavoC. P. F. (2000). Reinventing government: City manager attitudes and actions. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 535–548.
32.
KelloughJ. E.SeldenS. C. (2003). The reinvention of public personnel administration: An analysis of the diffusion of personnel management reforms in the states. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 165–176.
33.
KimS. K. (2005). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 245–261.
34.
KimY.ChenG. (2019). Cutback management and path dependency: Evidence from the two recent recessions. Local Government Studies, 46(2), 278–305.
LeeC.StrangD. (2006). The international diffusion of public-sector downsizing: Network emulation and theory-driven learning. International Organization, 60, 883–909. 10.1017/S0020818306060292.
37.
LevineC. H. (1978). Organizational decline and cutback management. Public Administration Review, 38(4), 316–325.
LinK. J.LuX.ZhangJ.ZhengY. (2020). State-owned enterprises in China: A review of 40 years of research and practice. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13(1), 31–55.
40.
LiouK. T.WangX. (2019). Managerial value, financial condition, and downsizing reform: A study of U.S. city governments. Public Personnel Management, 48(4), 471–492.
MaJ.ZhangZ. (2009). Remaking the Chinese administrative state since 1978: The double-movements perspective. The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 23(2), 225–252.
43.
MoonM. J.deLeonP. (2001). Municipal reinvention: Managerial values and diffusion among municipalities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 327–351.
44.
National Performance Review. (1993). From red tape to results: Crating a government that works better and costs less (Report of the National Performance Review. Led by Vice President Al Gore, 7 September). U.S. Government Printing Office.
45.
NgokK.ZhuG. (2007). Marketization, globalization and administrative reform in China: A zigzag road to a promising future. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 217–233.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Governance in China.
48.
PackardT.PattiR.DalyD.Tucker-TatlowJ.FarrellC. (2007). Cutback management strategies: Experiences in nine county human service agencies. Administration in Social Work, 32(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v32n01_05
RiccardT. N. (2025, February10). Federal workforce downsizing: Voluntary and involuntary mechanism. Congressional Research Service. CRS Insite. IN 12505
54.
RubinI. S. (1999). Downsizing: Managing the muddles. M@n@gement, 2(3), 69–87.
55.
SchmidtE.GroeneveldS.Van de WalleS. (2017). A change management perspective on public sector cutback management: Towards a framework for analysis. Public Management Review, 19(10), 1538–1555.
56.
SheehanJ.MorrisJ.HassardJ. (2000). Redundances in Chinese state enterprises: A research report. Industrial Relations, 39(3), 486–501.
57.
ShenR.CaoS. (2020). Modernization of government governance in China. Springer Nature Singapore.
58.
TianX.ChristensenT. (2019). Beyond NPM to post-NPM? A study of China’s government reforms over the past 40 years. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(7), 855–865.
XuX.MeierK.FlinkC. (2025). Benefits, blame, and budgets: Citizen responses to cutback management strategies in public education. International Public Management Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2025.2482611.
61.
YangK. (2007). China’s 1998 administrative reform and new public management: Applying a comparative framework. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(12), 1371–1392.
62.
YuH. (2019). Reform of state-owned enterprises in China: The Chinese Communist Party strikes back. Asian Studies Review, 43(2), 332–351.
63.
ZhongW.BaoY.HuangX. (2021). Celebrating differences while reserving commonality: Work values of Chinese public organization employees. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 59(4), 595–617.
