Based on social learning theory, this study examined the curvilinear relationship between benevolent leadership and subordinates’ interpersonal citizenship behavior and the moderating role of extraversion. We used a questionnaire survey to collect data in China at two points in time, resulting in 310 usable civil servants’ responses to test our hypotheses. Results showed an inverted U-shaped relationship between benevolent leadership and civil servants’ interpersonal citizenship behavior. Moreover, extraversion moderated the curvilinear relationship, such that the inverted U-shaped relationship was significant only for civil servants with low extraversion. For civil servants with high extraversion, benevolent leadership was positively related to their interpersonal citizenship behavior. These findings broaden benevolent leadership research by verifying its potential negative effects on subordinates’ ICB, which revealed that a moderate level of benevolent leadership should be emphasized and developed in the public sector.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, Inc.
2.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
3.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
4.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
5.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1.
6.
BenteinK.LapalmeM.GuerreroS.Parent-RocheleauX.SimardG. (2022). How can servant leaders foster public employees’ service-oriented behaviors? A multilevel multisource study in Canadian libraries. Public Administration Review, 82(2), 269–279.
7.
BernardsB. (2023). Do visionary and servant leaders reduce cognitive uncertainty of professionals? A study of team-based settings in public organizations. Public Management Review, 25(6), 1059–1081.
8.
BlauP. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
9.
BolgerN.EckenrodeJ. (1991). Social relationships, personality, and anxiety during a major stressful event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 440–449.
10.
BolinoM. C.KlotzA. C.TurnleyW. H.HarveyJ. (2013). Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 542–559.
11.
BrislinR. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In TriandisH. C.BerryJ. W. (Eds), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 389–444). Allyn and Bacon.
12.
BrownM. E.TrevinoL. K.HarrisonD. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 413–425.
13.
BrunettoY.BeattieR. S. (2020). Changing role of HRM in the public sector. Public Management Review, 22, 1–5.
14.
ChanS. C. H.MakW. M. (2012). Benevolent leadership and follower performance: The mediating role of leader-member exchange (LMX). Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(2), 285–301.
15.
ChenH.WeiW.WangL.BaoJ. (2024). Mercy does not hold the army: A study on the dark side effect of benevolent leadership. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 37(1), 133–149.
16.
ChenX. P.EberlyM. B.ChiangT.-J.FarhJ. L.ChengB. S. (2014). Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management, 40(3), 796–819.
17.
ChengB. S.ChouL. F.HuangM. P.FarhJ. L.PengS. (2003). A triad model of paternalistic leadership: Evidence from business organization in mainland China. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 20(1), 209–252.
18.
ChiM. N. (2020). Study on inverted U-shaped influence of benevolent leadership on employees’ suggestion behavior mediating role of sense of responsibility. Chinese Personnel Science, 4, 41–52.
19.
CooperC. A. (2024). Public servants’ political activity online in an institutional environment of caution: The role of personality traits. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 37(2), 255–283.
20.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor (NEO-FFI) Inventory Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
21.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678.
22.
DuffyK. A.HelzerE. G.HoyleR. H.Fukukura HelzerJ.ChartrandT. L. (2018). Pessimistic expectations and poorer experiences: The role of (low) extraversion in anticipated and experienced enjoyment of social interaction. PLoS ONE, 13(7), e0199146.
23.
EshetY.HarpazI. (2021). Personality traits’ predictors of outstanding performance in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(6), 1367–1394.
24.
FarhJ. L.ChengB. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In LiJ. T.TsuiA. S.WeldonE. (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 94–127). Macmillan, Inc.
25.
FarhJ. L.LiangJ.ChouL. F.ChengB. S. (2008). Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Research progress and future research directions. In ChenC. C.LeeY. T. (Eds.), Business leadership in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices (pp. 171–205). Cambridge University Press, Inc.
26.
FertikM. (2014). The problem with being too nice. Harvard Business Review. Digital article retrieved from https://hbr.org/201
27.
GeorgeB. (2021). Successful strategic plan implementation in public organizations: Connecting people, process, and plan (3Ps). Public Administration Review, 81(4), 793–798.
28.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M.HaS. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 111–133.
29.
GhoshK. (2015). Benevolent leadership in not-for-profit organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(5), 592–611.
30.
GrazianoW. G.TobinR. M. (2002). Agreeableness: Dimension of personality or social desirability artifact?Journal of Personality, 70(5), 695–727.
31.
Grego-PlanerD. (2022). The relationship between benevolent leadership and affective commitment from an employee perspective. PLoS ONE, 17(3), e0264142.
32.
GrossJ. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26.
33.
HaansR. F. J.PietersC.HeZ. L. (2016). Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U-and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1177–1195.
34.
HabashiM. M.GrazianoW. G.HooverA. E. (2016). Searching for the prosocial personality: A big five approach to linking personality and prosocial behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(9), 1177–1192.
35.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279.
36.
HamidullahM. F.Van RyzinG. G.LiH. (2016). The agreeable bureaucrat: Personality and PSM. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(6), 582–595.
37.
HarrisK. J.KacmarK. M. (2006). Too much of a good thing: The curvilinear effect of leader-member exchange on stress. Journal of Social Psychology, 146(1), 65–84.
38.
HuangQ.LiuH. (2023). How does paternalistic leadership enhance civil servants’ public service motivation? The mediating mechanism of trust in leader. Administration & Society, 55(9), 1680–1709.
39.
JakobsenM. L. F.AndersenL. B.van LutterveltM. P. (2022). Theorizing leadership credibility: The concept and causes of the perceived credibility of leadership initiatives. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 5(3), 243–254.
40.
JensenU. T.AndersenL. B.JacobsenC. B. (2019). Only when we agree! How value congruence moderates the impact of goal-oriented leadership on public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 12–24.
41.
JiangR.LinX. Q. (2020). Trickle-down effect of benevolent leadership on unethical employee behavior: A cross-level moderated mediation model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(6), 721–740.
42.
JonesB. J. (2021). What makes government work great: The characteristics of positive public service. Public Personnel Management, 50(4), 610–628.
43.
JudgeT. A.BonoJ. E.IliesR.GerhardtM. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.
44.
KarakasF.SarigolluE. (2012). Benevolent leadership: Conceptualization and construct development. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 74–89.
45.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
46.
LiG.RubensteinA. L.LinW.WangM.ChenX. (2018). The curvilinear effect of benevolent leadership on team performance: The mediating role of team action processes and the moderating role of team commitment. Personnel Psychology, 71(3), 369–397.
47.
LiH.SunS.WangP.YangY. (2022). Examining the inverted U-shaped relationship between benevolent leadership and employees’ work initiative: The role of work engagement and growth need strength. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 699366.
48.
LiangL. Z.LuY. (2016). Civil servants’ interpersonal ecology: Discord, causes and adjustment approaches. Chinese Public Administration, 3, 14–19.
49.
LinW.MaJ.ZhangQ.LiJ.JiangF. (2018). How is benevolent leadership linked to employee creativity? The mediating role of leader–member exchange and the moderating role of power distance orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 1099-1115.
50.
LiouK. T. (2024). Applying organizational change strategies in government agencies: Lessons from the Chinese government reform. Chinese Public Administration Review, 15(2), 75–89.
51.
LiuH. T.ChenD.-Y. (2021). The effect of public servants’ reinvention reform perception on organizational performance in Taiwan: The mediating roles of public service motivation and organizational commitment. Chinese Public Administration Review, 12(1), 35–50.
52.
LuL.LiF.LeungK.SavaniK.MorrisM. W. (2018). When can culturally diverse teams be more creative? The role of leaders’ benevolent paternalism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(4), 402–415.
53.
LucasR. E.DienerE. (2001). Understanding extraverts’ enjoyment of social situations: The importance of pleasantness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 343–356.
54.
LuthansF.YoussefC. M.AvolioB. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press.
55.
MastenA. S. (2014). Ordinary magic: Resilience in development. Guilford Press.
56.
MayerD. MKuenziM.GreenbaumR. L.BardesM.SalvadorR. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 1–13.
57.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516.
58.
MolinesM.El AkremiA.StormeM.CelikP. (2022). Beyond the tipping point: The curvilinear relationships of transformational leadership, leader–member exchange, and emotional exhaustion in the French police. Public Management Review, 24(1), 80–105.
59.
NguyenL. L. H. (2023). Ethical leadership and interpersonal citizenship behavior in the public sector, International Journal of Public Leadership, 19(3), 246–260.
60.
NguyenN. T. H.NguyenD.VoN.TuanL. T. (2023). Fostering public sector employees’ innovative behavior: The roles of servant leadership, public service motivation, and learning goal orientation. Administration & Society, 55(1), 30–63.
61.
NoguchiK.GohmC. L.DalskyD. J. (2006). Cognitive tendencies of focusing on positive and negative information. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(6), 891–910.
62.
OzerD. J.Benet-MartínezV. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.
63.
ParkM.KimY. (2025). Revisiting public service motivation: A context-specific exploration of its linkages to job performance pre- and post-COVID-19. Chinese Public Administration Review, 16, 77–88.
64.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373.
65.
PhongD. N.NguyenH. K.Angelina NhatH. L.HoH. X. (2023). Benevolent leadership and organizational citizenship behaviors in a higher education context: A moderated mediation model. Personnel Review, 52(4), 1209–1232.
66.
PierceJ. R.AguinisH. (2013). The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. Journal of Management, 39, 313–338.
67.
PodsakoffN. P.WhitingS. W.PodsakoffP. M.BlumeB. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122–141.
68.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
69.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
70.
QiuQ. (2017). Impact of civil servants’ public service motivation on organizational citizenship behavior: An empirical study of 17 cities in Shandong province. Chinese Public Administration, 6), 69–74.
71.
RaineyH. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
72.
RashmanL.WithersE.HartleyJ. (2009). Organizational learning and knowledge in public service organizations: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(4), 463–494.
73.
SaucierG. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar big-five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 506–516.
74.
ScrogginsW. A.ThomasS. L.MorrisJ. A. (2008). Psychological testing in personnel selection, part II: The refinement of methods and standards in employee selection. Public Personnel Management, 37(2), 185–198.
75.
SettoonR. P.MossholderK. W. (2002). Relational quality and relationship context as antecedents of person- and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 255–267.
76.
ShawK. H.LiaoH. Y. (2021). Does benevolent leadership promote follower unethical pro-organizational behavior? A social identity perspective. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 28(1), 31–44.
77.
SmillieL. D.DeYoungC. G.HallP. J. (2015). Clarifying the relation between extraversion and positive affect. Journal of Personality, 83(5), 564–574.
78.
SouthwickS. M.BonannoG. A.MastenA. S.Panter-BrickC.YehudaR. (2014). Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: Interdisciplinary perspectives. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5(1), 25338.
79.
StelmokieneA.EndriulaitieneA. (2015). Transformational leadership in perception of subordinates: Personality traits and social identification as predictors. Baltic Journal of Management, 10(3), 331–344.
80.
TanB.WangZ.ZhaoS.LiaoJ. (2023). A dual-path model of ethical leadership’s influence on civil servants’ discretionary work behavior: Probing the social learning and social exchange processes. Public Personnel Management, 53(2), 175–202.
81.
TangC.NaumannS. E. (2015). Paternalistic leadership, subordinate perceived leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(3), 291–306.
82.
TaylorS. G.KluemperD. H.MossholderK. W. (2010). Linking personality to interpersonal citizenship behavior: The moderating effect of empathy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 815–834.
83.
Tran PhamT. K. (2024). Empowering leadership and employee well-being: The role of psychological empowerment and time pressure. International Journal of Public Leadership, 20(1), 36–50.
84.
TremblayM. (2024). The interplay between helping behavior and absenteeism in teams: A longitudinal examination of their reciprocal relationship in a public organization. Public Personnel Management, 53(3), 351–376.
85.
TuanL. T. (2018). Behind the influence of job crafting on citizen value co-creation with the public organization: Joint effects of paternalistic leadership and public service motivation. Public Management Review, 20(10), 1533–1561.
86.
Vigoda-GadotE. (2007). Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empirical examination of compulsory extra-role behavior in the workplace. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(3), 377.
87.
WatsonD.HubbardB. (2010). Adaptational style and dispositional structure: Coping in the context of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 64(4), 737–774.
88.
WenB.GuoS.HuQ.WanJ. (2022). Ruling with a velvet glove: The catalyzing role of humble leadership in transforming employees’ empowerment role identity into proactivity. Chinese Public Administration Review, 13(3), 178–191.
89.
XuQ.ZhaoY.XiM.ZhaoS. (2018). Impact of benevolent leadership on follower taking charge: Roles of work engagement and role-breadth self-efficacy. China Management Studies, 12, 741–755.
90.
YeS.ChenL.QuY. (2024). Demystifying benevolent leadership: When subordinates feel obligated to undertake illegitimate tasks. Journal of Business Ethics, 195(3), 537–561.
91.
YeanT. F.TanF. C.NadarajahD. (2022). Determinants of adaptability and its impact on the change readiness of civil servants. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 35(5), 622–639.
92.
ZhangY.HuaiM.XieY. (2015). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice in China: A dual process model. Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 25–36.
93.
ZhaoY. (2022). The correlation between the Big Five personality traits and political information exposure. Chinese Public Administration Review, 14(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/15396754221129707
