Do public service motivation and organizational processes influence job satisfaction and organizational commitment? A comparative study in public and private organizations

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of public service motivation (PSM) on job satisfaction and organizational commitment while controlling for four types of organizational processes and individual attributes. Furthermore, it tests whether PSM is unique to public organizations by comparing public and private organizations. We use individual-level microdata from the “Survey on the Comparison of Public and Private Organizations in Korea” to address these issues. The sample for this survey, conducted by the Korea Institute of Public Administration (KIPA) in 2014, included 2,047 participants, consisting of 1,000 civil servants and 1,047 private sector employees. First, we find that PSM positively impacts job-related work outcomes such as job satisfaction and organizational commitment in both public and private organizations. Second, we show that public sector employees have significantly higher levels of PSM than their private sector counterparts. These results indicate the importance of PSM in public administration and have a policy implication that public organizations need to design effective methods to improve the PSM levels of their employees. Third, both PSM and organizational processes jointly influence job satisfaction and organizational commitment; however, their effects differ between the public and private sectors. In conclusion, our research confirms that PSM is a crucial determinant of public organization characteristics in the East Asian context, highlighting its significance for public administration.

Keywords

Job satisfaction organizational commitment organizational process public service motivation South Korea

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agho

A. O.

Mueller

C. W.

Price

J. L.

(1993). Determinants of employee job satisfaction: An empirical test of a causal model. Human Relations: Studies Towards the Integration of the Social Sciences, 46(8), 1007–1027.

Alutto

J. A.

Hrebiniak

L. G.

Alonso

R. C.

(1973). On operationalizing the concept of commitment. Social Forces, 51(4), 448–454.

Andersen

L. B.

Kjeldsen

A. M.

(2013). Public service motivation, user orientation, and job satisfaction: A question of employment sector? International Public Management Journal, 16(2), 252–274.

Angle

H. L.

Perry

J. L.

(1983). Organizational commitment: Individual and organizational influences. Work and Occupations, 10(2), 123–146.

Baldwin

J. N.

(1990). Perceptions of public versus private sector personnel and informal red tape: Their impact on motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 20(1), 7–28.

Barnett

R. C.

Brennan

R. T.

(1997). Change in job conditions, change in psychological distress, and gender: A longitudinal study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(3), 253–274.

Blau

P. M.

(1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193–206.

Bright

(2008). Does public service motivation really make a difference on the job satisfaction and turnover intentions of public employees? The American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 149–166.

Brinkerhoff

D. W.

Brinkerhoff

J. M.

(2015). Public sector management reform in developing countries: Perspectives beyond NPM orthodoxy. Public Administration and Development, 35(4), 222–237.

10.

Buchanan

(1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 533–546.

11.

Camilleri

(2006). Towards developing an organisational commitment: Public service motivation model for the Maltese public service employees. Public Policy and Administration, 21(1), 63–83.

12.

Camilleri

Van Der Heijden

B. I. J. M

. (2007). Organizational commitment, public service motivation, and performance within the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(2), 241–274.

13.

Campbell

J. W.

(2016). PSM and turnover intention in public organizations: Does change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior play a role? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(4), 323–346.

14.

Chun

Y. H.

Rainey

H. G.

(2005). Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in US federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 529–557.

15.

Cotton

J. L.

Tuttle

J. M.

(1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research. The Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 55–70.

16.

Crewson

P. E.

(1997). Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(4), 499–518.

17.

DeHart-Davis

Pandey

S. K.

(2005). Red tape and public employees: Does perceived rule dysfunction alienate managers? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 133–148.

18.

De Vries

Nemec

. (2013). Public sector reform: An overview of recent literature and research on NPM and alternative paths. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 4–16.

19.

du Gay

. (2000). In praise of bureaucracy: Weber, organization, ethics. Sage.

20.

du Gay

. (2005). The values of bureaucracy. Oxford University Press.

21.

Deshpande

S. P.

(2014). The impact of caring climate, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment on job performance of employees in a China’s insurance company. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(2), 339–349.

22.

Goodsell

C. T.

(2003). The concept of public space and its democratic manifestations. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(4), 361–383.

23.

Gupta

Upadhyay

(2012). Impact of effectiveness of performance management system on employee satisfaction and commitment. International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering, 2(7), 96–106.

24.

Hoggett

(2005). A service to the public: The containment of ethical and moral conflicts by public bureaucracies. In du Gay

(Ed.), The values of bureaucracy (pp. 165–190). Oxford University Press.

25.

Huang

W.-L.

(2019). The impact of extrinsic rewards and public service motivation on public employees’ work performance: Does seniority matter? Chinese Public Administration Review, 10(1), 12–27.

26.

Karolidis

Vouzas

(2019). From PSM to helping behavior in the contemporary Greek public sector: The roles of organizational identification and job satisfaction. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(6), 1418–1447.

27.

Kim

(2006). Public service motivation and organizational citizenship behavior in Korea. International Journal of Manpower, 27(8), 722–740.

28.

Kim

(2011). Testing a revised measure of public service motivation: Reflective versus formative specification. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 521–546.

29.

Kim

Henderson

A. C.

Eom

T. H.

(2015). At the front line: Examining the effects of perceived job significance, employee commitment, and job involvement on public service motivation. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(4), 713–733.

30.

Kjeldsen

A. M.

Hansen

J. R.

(2018). Sector differences in the public service motivation–job satisfaction relationship: Exploring the role of organizational characteristics. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(1), 24–48.

31.

Liu

H. T.

Chen

D.-Y.

(2021). The effect of public servants’ reinvention reform perception on organizational performance in Taiwan: The mediating roles of public service motivation and organizational commitment. Chinese Public Administration Review, 12(1), 35–50.

32.

Locke

E. A.

(1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3(2), 157–189.

33.

Locke

E. A.

(1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In Dunnette

M. D.

(Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297–1343). Rand McNally.

34.

Locke

E. A.

Latham

G. P.

(1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Prentice Hall.

35.

Locke

E. A.

Latham

G. P.

(2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. The American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.

36.

Locke

E. A.

Latham

G. P.

(2019). The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective. Motivation Science, 5(2), 93–105.

37.

Madlock

P. E.

(2008). The link between leadership style, communicator competence, and employee satisfaction. Journal of Business Communication, 45(1), 61–78.

38.

Moon

C. I.

(2009). South Korea in 2008: From crisis to crisis. Asian Survey, 49(1), 120–128.

39.

Moon

M. J.

(2000). Organizational commitment revisited in new public management: Motivation, organizational culture, sector, and managerial level. Public Performance & Management Review, 24(2), 177–194.

40.

Morris

J. H.

Steers

R. M.

(1980). Structural influences on organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17(1), 50–57.

41.

Mowday

R. T.

Porter

L. W.

Steers

(1982). Organizational linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic Press.

42.

Moynihan

D. P.

Pandey

S. K.

(2007). Finding workable levers over work motivation: Comparing job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Administration & Society, 39(7), 803–832.

43.

Naff

K. C.

Crum

(1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a difference? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(4), 5–16.

44.

Newman

Sheikh

A. Z.

(2012). Organizational commitment in Chinese small- and medium-sized enterprises: The role of extrinsic, intrinsic and social rewards. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(2), 349–367.

45.

Newman

(2002). The new public management, modernization and institutional change: Disruptions, disjunctures and dilemmas. In McLaughlin

Osborne

S. P.

Ferlie

(Eds.), New public management: Current trends and future prospects (pp. 77–91). Routledge.

46.

OECD. (2005). Performance-related pay policies for government employees. OECD Publishing.

47.

Omari

Paull

(2015). Public sector work intensification and negative behaviors. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(4), 603–613.

48.

Osborne

(1993). Reinventing government. Public Productivity & Management Review, 16(4), 349–356.

49.

Park

S. M.

Rainey

H. G.

(2008). Leadership and public service motivation in US federal agencies. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 109–142.

50.

Perry

J. L.

(1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22.

51.

Perry

J. L.

(2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 471–488.

52.

Perry

J. L.

Wise

L. R.

(1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367–373.

53.

Potipiroon

Ford

M. T.

(2017). Does public service motivation always lead to organizational commitment? Examining the moderating roles of intrinsic motivation and ethical leadership. Public Personnel Management, 46(3), 211–238.

54.

Pratchett

Wingfield

(1996). Petty bureaucracy and woolly-minded liberalism? The changing ethos of local government officers. Public Administration, 74(4), 639–656.

55.

Wang

(2018). Employee involvement, public service motivation, and perceived organizational performance: Testing a new model. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(4), 746–764.

56.

Rainey

H. G.

(2009). Understanding and managing public organizations (4th ed.). John Wiley and Sons.

57.

Ritz

Brewer

G. A.

Neumann

(2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426.

58.

Rodwell

J. J.

Kienzle

Shadur

M. A.

(1998). The relationship among work-related perceptions, employee attitudes, and employee performance: The integral role of communications. Human Resource Management, 37(3-4), 277–293.

59.

Sadaf

Mukhtar

Nemati

A. R.

Yousaf

Javed

(2022). Impact of organizational value system, perceived organizational support, and job satisfaction on organizational commitment. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 4(1), 71–99.

60.

Schneider

D. S.

Vaught

B. C.

(1993). A comparison of job satisfaction between public and private sector managers. Public Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 68–83.

61.

Shatil

(2020). Managerialism: A social order on the rise. Critical Sociology, 46(7–8), 1189–1206.

62.

Shim

D. C.

Park

H. H.

Eom

T. H.

(2017). Street-level bureaucrats’ turnover intention: Does public service motivation matter? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 563–582.

63.

Speklé

R. F.

Verbeeten

F. H. M.

(2014). The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 131–146.

64.

Stazyk

E. C.

Pandey

S. K.

Wright

B. E.

(2011). Understanding affective organizational commitment: The importance of institutional context. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 603–624.

65.

Steers

R. M.

(1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 46–56.

66.

Taylor

Westover

J. H.

(2011). Job satisfaction in the public service: The effects of public service motivation, workplace attributes and work relations. Public Management Review, 13(5), 731–751.

67.

Vandenabeele

(2008). Development of a public service motivation measurement scale: Corroborating and extending Perry’s measurement instrument. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 143–167.

68.

Walker

R. M.

Brewer

G. A.

(2009). Can management strategy minimize the impact of red tape on organizational performance? Administration & Society, 41(4), 423–448.

69.

Weber

(1994). The profession and vocation of politics. In Lassman

Speirs

(Eds.), Weber: Political writings (pp. 309–369). Cambridge University Press.

70.

Wright

B. E.

Pandey

S. K.

(2011). Public organizations and mission valence: When does mission matter? Administration & Society, 43(1), 22–44.

71.

Yang

Pandey

S. K.

(2009). How do perceived political environment and administrative reform affect employee commitment? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 335–360.

72.

Zhang

(2020). What makes public space public? The chaos of public space definitions and a new epistemological approach. Administration & Society, 52(5), 749–770.