The purpose of this study was to examine the construct validity of Beery's Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI test) and its hierarchical structure of item difficulties for Taiwanese children. The VMI test was administered to 314 Taiwanese children aged from 3.3 to 13.3 years. The Rasch model of measurement was chosen to investigate the goodness-of-fit of individual items within the VMI test and the sequence of item difficulty. The results revealed that the 24 items of the VMI test measure a unidimensional construct. The difficulty levels of the items were spread widely and evenly across the age range tested. A person separation reliability of .92 and an item separation reliability of .99 indicated that the VMI test had good discriminatory power. However, the different sequence of item difficulty preliminarily found in this study indicates that the item order or the scoring criteria should be revised for Taiwanese children. Further studies of the standardization and validity of the VMI test and revision of the sequence for the Taiwanese population are necessary.
AbbatielloA. & KpoW. (1988). Test of Visual-Motor Integration: Evaluation of test effectiveness for practitioners. Special Services in the Schools, 5, 77–88.
2.
BeeryK.E. (1982). The Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. (Rev. Ed.) Cleveland, OH: Modern Curriculum Press.
3.
BeeryK.E. (1989). Revised Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. Cleveland, OH: Modern Curriculum Press.
4.
BeeryK.E. & BuktenicaN.A. (1967). The Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. Chicago, IL: Follett Education Corporation.
5.
BerryJ.W.PoortingaY.H.SegallM.H., & DasenPR. (1992). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BryantG.M.DaviesK.J., & NewcombeK.G. (1974). The Denver Developmental Screening Test: Achievement of test items in the first year of life by Denver and Cardiff infants. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 16, 475–484.
7.
CellaD.F.LloydS.R., & WrightB.D. (1996). Cross-cultural instrument equating: Current research and future directions. In SpilkerB. (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (2nd ed.), (pp. 707–715). New York, NY: Lippincott-Raven.
8.
ChanJ. (1976). Is Raven's Progressive Matrices test culture-free or culture-fair?—some research findings in Hong Kong context. Paper presented at the Third International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology Congress, Tilburg.
9.
FisherA.G. (1993). Assessment of IADL motor skills: An application of many faceted Rasch analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 319–329.
10.
HoosainR. (1986). Language, orthography and cognitive processes: Chinese perspectives for the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. International Journal of Behavior Development, 9, 507–525.
11.
KleinA.E. (1978). The validity of the Beery Test of Visual-Motor Integration in predicting achievement in kindergarten, first, and second grades. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 457–461.
12.
LepkinS.R. & PryzwanskyW. (1983). Interrater reliability of the original and a revised scoring system for the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 284–288.
13.
LinC.C. & FuV.R. (1990). A comparison of child-rearing practices among Chinese, immigrant Chinese, and Caucasian-American parents. Child Development, 61, 429–433.
14.
LiuH. (1972). A Revision of Beery's Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. Taipei, Taiwan: Provincial Taipei Junior Normal College.
15.
MaoH. (1995). Performance of Chinese children in Taiwan on Beery's Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. Journal of the Occupational Therapy Association of the Republic of China, 13, 13–24.
16.
Mardell-CzudnowskiC.HwangC., & WangT. (1987). Cross-cultural adaptation of a developmental test (DIAL-R) for young children in Taiwan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 475–492.
17.
MartinR.SewellT., & ManniJ. (1977). Effects of race and social class on preschool performance on the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. Psychology in the School, 14, 466–478.
18.
McKayM.F. & NealeM.D. (1985). Predicting early school achievement in reading and handwriting using major ‘error’ categories from the Bender-Gestalt Test for young children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 647–654.
19.
MerbitzC.MorrisJ., & GripJ.C. (1989). Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70, 308–312.
20.
Miller-JoanesD. (1987). Culture and testing. American Psychologist, 44, 360–366.
21.
PalisanoR.J. & DichterC.G. (1989). Comparison of two tests of visual-motor development used to assess children with learning disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 1099–1103.
22.
PoortingaY.H. (1989). Equivalence of cross-culture data: An overview of basic issues. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 737–756.
23.
PoortingaY.H.FonsJ.R., & VijverV.D. (1987). Explaining cross-cultural differences: Bias analysis and beyond. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 259–282.
24.
PorterG. & BinderG.M. (1981). A pilot study of visual-motor developmental integration test reliability: The Beery Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration and the Bender—Gestalt Test. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 124–127.
25.
PryzwanskyW.B. (1977). The use of the Developmental test of Visual-Motor Integration as a group screening instrument. Psychology in the Schools, 14, 419–422.
26.
RyckmanD.B. & RentfrowR.K. (1971). The Beery Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration: An investigation of reliability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 333–334.
27.
SaekiK.ClarkF.A., & AzenS.P. (1985). Performance of Japanese and Japanese-American children on the Motor Accuracy-Revised and Design Copying Tests of the Southern California Sensory Integration Tests. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 103–109.
28.
SchoolerD.L. & AndersonR.L. (1979). Race differences on the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration, the Slosson Intelligence Test, and the ABC Inventory. Psychology in the School, 16, 453–456.
29.
ScribnerS. & ColeM. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
SheridanE.M. (1983). Reading disabilities: Can we blame the written language?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 81–86.
31.
SilversteinB.FisherW.P.KilgoreK.M.HarleyP., & HarveyR.F. (1992). Applying psychometric criteria to functional assessment in medical rehabilitation: II. Defining interval measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 507–518.
32.
SolomonsG. & SolomonsH.C. (1975). Motor development in Yucatecan infants. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 17, 41–46.
33.
SongMJ. & GinsburgH.P. (1987). The development of informal and formal mathematical thinking in Korean and U.S. children. Child Development, 58, 1286–1296.
34.
SPSS, Inc. (1993). SPSS for Windows, Release 6.0. Chicago, IL.
35.
StevensonH.W.StiglerJ.W.LuckerG.W.LeeS.Y.HsuC.C., & KitamuraS. (1985). Cognitive performance and academic achievement of Japanese, Chinese, and American children. Child Development, 56, 718–734.
36.
SuperC.M. & HarknessS. (1986). Developmental niche: A conceptualization at the interface of child and culture. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 545–569.
37.
The Psychological Corporation. (1981). Hong Kong Wechsler intelligence scale for children manual. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation.
38.
TsengM.H. (1994). Differences in perceptual-motor measures in children with good and poor handwriting. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 14, 19–36.
39.
WangW. (1973). The Chinese language. Scientific American, 228, 51–60.
40.
WilsonM. (1994). Comparing attitude across different cultures: Two quantitative approaches to construct validity. In WilsonM. (Ed.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice, Vol. 2, (pp. 271–294). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41.
WrightB.D. & LinacreJ.M. (1993). BIGSTEPS: Rasch analysis for all two-facets models (version 2. 46)[Computer program]. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
