The present study examined if orthographic, finger function, and visual-motor processes as well as gender made a unique and significant contribution to the prediction of the handwriting status of fifth grade students classified as good or poor handwriters. Visual-motor integration and finger functioning made a unique and significant contribution to the prediction of handwriting status, whereas gender and orthographic processes did not. Furthermore, knowledge of children's gender, finger functioning, and visual-motor status resulted in the correct classification of 77% of the participating students as good or poor handwriters.
AbbottR.D., & BerningerV.W. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary- and intermediate-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 478–508.
2.
AylwardE.H., & SchmidtS. (1986). An examination of three tests of visual-motor integration. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 328–330.
3.
BeeryK. (1989). The VMI. Developmental test of visual-motor integration: Administration, scoring, and teaching manual. Cleveland, OH: Modern Curriculum Press.
4.
BenderL. (1938). A Visual Motor Gestalt Test and its clinical use. American Orthopsychiatric Association Research Monograph, 3.
5.
BerningerV. (1990). Multiple orthographic codes: Key to alternative instructional methodologies for developing orthographic-phonological connections underlying word identification. School Psychology Review, 19, 518–533.
6.
BerningerV.W., & AbbottR.D. (1994). Multiple orthographic and phonological codes in literacy acquisition: An evolving research program. In BerningerV.W. (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge. volume I: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 217–319). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
7.
BerningerV.W.CartwrightA.C.YatesC.M.SwansonH.L., & AbbottR.D. (1993, March). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades: Shared and unique functional systems. Paper presented at biennial meeting of Society for Research of Child Development, New Orleans, LA.
8.
BerningerV.W., & ColwellS.O. (1985). Relationship between neurodevelopmental and educational findings in children aged 6 and 12 years. Pediatrics, 75, 697–702.
9.
BerningerV.W.MizokawaD.T., & BraggR. (1991). Theory-based diagnosis and remediation of writing disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 57–79.
10.
BerningerV., & RutbergJ. (1992). Relationship of finger function to beginning writing: Application to diagnosis of writing disabilities. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 34, 198–215.
11.
BerningerV.VaughnK.AbbottR.AbbottS.RoganL.BrooksA.ReedE., & GrahamS. (In press). Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers: Transfer from handwriting to composition. Journal of Educational Psychology.
12.
BerningerV.YatesC.CartwrightA.RutbergJ.RemyE., & AbbottR. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 257–280.
13.
BloteA., & Hamstra-BletzL. (1991). A longitudinal study on the structure of handwriting. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 983–994.
14.
BreenM.J.CarlsonM., & LehmanJ. (1985). The revised Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration: Its relation to the VMI, WISC-R, and Bender Gestalt for a group of elementary aged learning disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 136–138.
15.
BriggsD. (1980). A study of the influence of handwriting upon grades using examination scripts. Educational Review, 32, 185–193.
16.
ChaseC. (1986). Essay test scoring: Interaction of relevant variables. Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 33–41.
17.
CizekJ. (1992). Test of legible handwriting. In ConoleyJ. & KramerJ. (Eds.), Eleventh mental measurement yearbook (pp 967–968). Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press.
18.
CornhillH., & Case-SmithJ. (1996). Factors that relate to good and poor handwriting. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 732–739.
19.
DeckerS., & DeFriesJ. (1981). Cognitive ability profiles in families of reading-disabled children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 23, 217–227.
20.
DencklaM.B. (1973). Development of speed in repetitive and successive finger-movements in normal children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 15, 635–645.
21.
DencklaM.B. (1974). Development of motor co-ordination in normal children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 16, 729–741.
22.
EllisA. (1982). Spelling and writing (and reading and speaking). In EllisA. (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions. London: Academic Press.
23.
FletcherJ.TaylorH.MorrisR., & SatzP. (1982). Finger recognition skills and reading achievement: A developmental neuropsychological analysis. Developmental Psychology, 18, 124–132.
24.
GardnerM.F. (1986). Test of visual-perceptual skills (non-motor). Seattle: Special Children Publications.
25.
GoldsteinD.J.PetersonN.C., & SheafferC.I. (1989). Concurrent validity of the Gardner Test of Visual-Motor Skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 605–606.
26.
GrahamS. (1990). The role of production factors in learning disabled students' compositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 781–791.
27.
GrahamS. (1992). Issues in handwriting instruction. Focus on Exceptional Children, 25, 1–14.
28.
GrahamS.BerningerV.AbbottR.AbbottS., & WhitakerD. (1997). The role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 170–182.
29.
GrahamS., & WeintraubN. (1996). A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 7–87.
30.
HagborgW., & Aiello-CoultierM. (1994). The Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration—3R and teachers' ratings of written language. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 371–374.
31.
HughesD.C.KeelingB., & TuckB.R. (1983). Effects of achievement expectations and handwriting quality on scoring essays. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 65–70.
32.
LarsenS.C., & HammillD.D. (1989). Test of Legible Handwriting (TOLH). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
33.
LaszloJ., & BroderickP. (1991). Drawing and handwriting difficulties: Reasons for and remediation of dysfunction. In WarmJ.WingA., & SovikN. (Eds.), Development of graphic skills: Research, perspectives and educational implications (pp. 259–280). London: Academic Press.
34.
MaelandA.F., & KarlsdottirR. (1991). Development of reading, spelling, and writing skills from third to sixth grade in normal and dysgraphic school children. In WannJ.WingA. M., & SovikN. (Eds.), Development of graphic skills: Research perspectives and educational implications (pp 53–75). London: Academic Press.
35.
NorusisM. (1994). SPSS Advanced Statistics 6.1. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
36.
OtisA.S., & LennonR.T. (1989). Otis-Lennon School Ability Test. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
37.
PhelpsJ., & StempelL. (1988). The Children's Handwriting Evaluation Scale for Manuscript Writing. Reading Improvement, 25, 247–255.
38.
QuantL. (1946). Factor affecting the legibility of handwriting. Journal of Experimental Education, 14, 297–316.
39.
RolandP.LarsenB.LassenN., & SkinhojE. (1980). Supplementary motor area and other cortical areas in organization of voluntary movements in man. Journal of Neurophysiology, 43, 118–136.
40.
RubinN., & HendersonS.E. (1982). Two sides of the same coin: Variation in teaching methods and failure to learn to write. Special Education: Forward Trends, 9, 17–24.
41.
RutbergJ. (1998). A comparison of two treatments for remediating handwriting disabilities. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Washington.
42.
SmythM.M., & SilversG. (1987). Functions of vision in the control of handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 65, 47–64.
43.
SovikN. (1975). Developmental cybernetics of handwriting and graphic behavior. Boston: Universitetsforlaget.
44.
SovikN. (1981). An experimental study of individualized learning/instruction in copying, tracking, and handwriting based on feedback principles. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 53, 195–215.
45.
SovikN. (1984). The effects of a remedial tracking program on the writing performance of dysgraphic children. Scandanavian Journal of Educational Research, 28, 129–147.
46.
Sweedler-Brown, CO. (1992). The effects of training on the appearance bias of holistic essay graders. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26, 24–88.
47.
TarnopolM., & de FeldmanN. (1987). Handwriting and school achievement: A cross-cultural study. In AlstonJ. & TaylorJ. (Eds.), Handwriting. Theory, research and practice (pp. 189–215). New York: Nichols.
48.
TeulingsH., & SchomakerL. (1993). Invariant properties between stroke features in handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 82, 69–88.
49.
The Psychological Corporation. (1992). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test manual. San Antonio, TX: Author.
50.
TsengM., & MurrayE. (1994). Differences in perceptual motor measures in children with good and poor handwriting. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 14, 19–36.
51.
van GalenG. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, 10, 165–191.
52.
van GalenG., & TeullingsH. (1983). The independent monitoring of form and scale factors in handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 9–22.
53.
WeilM.J., & Cunningham-AmundsonS.J. (1994). Relationship between visual motor and handwriting skills of children in kindergarten. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 982–988.
54.
WilliamsJ.ZoltenA.J.RickertV.I.SpenceG.T., & AshcraftE.T. (1994). Use of nonverbal tests to screen for writing dysfluency in school-age children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 803–809.
55.
WolffP.H.GunnoeC., & CohenC. (1983). Associated movements as a measure of developmental age. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 25, 417–429.
56.
WoodcockR. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
57.
ZivaniJ., & ElkinsJ. (1984). An evaluation of handwriting performance. Educational Review, 38, 247–257.
