This study used an open-ended self-report survey to define ‘research’ and ‘researcher’ from the clinician's perspective. Seventy-five occupational therapists working in 6 acute care metropolitan hospitals in Sydney, Australia participated in this study (75% response rate). There were four key findings. First, a profile of therapist research revealed variations in levels of involvement with most (75%) having none. This was not related to postgraduate qualifications or study, years of experience, age, clinical specialty or seniority. Second, the nature of activities identified to be research by clinicians varied: project names, specific research tasks, input, output-related activities such as thinking and professional development activities. Third, research was defined in terms of its attributes, process, and outcomes. Fourth, researchers were described as being engaged in specific research tasks, other general tasks that progressed the research, and they were identified as producers of research outcomes. Differences were identified in responses between those therapists who were involved in research and those who were not.
American Occupational Therapy Foundation. (1979). Research in occupational therapy, it's everybody's responsibility. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 33, 666–667.
2.
American Occupational Therapy Foundation. (1983). The Foundation-Research competencies: For clinicians and educators. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37, 44–46.
3.
American Occupational Therapy Foundation. (1995). Research grant policies and current research funding priorities of the American Occupational Therapy Foundation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 835–836.
4.
AndersonB. & BellJ. (1988). Occupational therapy: It's place in Australia's history. Sydney, Australia: New South Wales Association of Occupational Therapists.
5.
BarnittR. (1980). On giving research advice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 285–287.
6.
BarnittR. (1995). Ensuring reality in research. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 29–10.
7.
BarrisR. & KielhofnerG. (1985). Generating and using knowledge in occupational therapy: Implications for professional education. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 5, 113–114.
8.
BaumC.M.BoyleM.A., & EdwardsD.F. (1984). Initiating occupational therapy clinical research. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 33, 267–269.
9.
BlackburnR. (1979). Academic careers: Patterns and possibilities. Current Issues in Higher Education, 2, 25–27.
10.
BlumerH. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
11.
BreinesE.B. (1988). Redefining professionalism for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 55–57.
12.
CameronS.M. & BlackburnR. (1981). Sponsorship and academic career success. Journal of Higher Education, 52, 369–377.
13.
ChristiansenC.H. & BaumC. (Ed.). (1991). Occupational therapy overcoming human performance deficits. Thorofare, New Jersey: Slack.
14.
ClarkF.SharrottG.HillD.J., & CampbellS. (1985). A comparison of impact of undergraduate and graduate occupational therapy education on professional productivity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 155–162.
15.
CohenH. (1988). How to read a research paper. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 596–600.
16.
ColbornA.P. (1993). Combining practice and research. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 693–703.
17.
ConineT. (1972). Dilemmas of research in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26, 81–84.
18.
CoxR.C., & WestW.L. (1982). Fundamentals of research for health professionals. Rockville, Maryland: RAMSCO.
19.
CreswellJ. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
20.
CusickA. (1987). Research—production, publication, and practice or perish?Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 34, 85–88.
CusickA. (1995). Australian occupational therapy research: A review of publications 1987–1991. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 42, 67–76.
23.
CusickA. & RotemA. (1994). Definitions of research by occupational therapy clinicians: An exploratory study. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 41, 99–114.
24.
DeitzJ.C. (1993). Research: A systematic process for answering questions. In HopkinsH.L. & SmithH.D., (Eds.). Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy (8th ed.) (pp. 401–416). Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co.
25.
DenzinN. (1989a). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
DunnW. (1985). Occupational therapy's challenge: Care giving and research. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 259–264.
28.
EtzioniA. (Ed.). (1969). The semi-professions and their organization. New York: The Free press.
29.
FisherA.G.KielhofnerG., & DavisC. (1989). Research values of occupational and physical therapists. Journal of Allied Health, 18, 143–145.
30.
FlaniganK.S.BallingerP.W.GrantH.K.BennettD.SchillerM.R.WallerKVJordanL.GierhartJ.BrodnikPariser M.Van SonL.G., & TestatE.W. (1988). Research productivity of allied health faculty. Journal of Allied Health, 17, 87–100.
31.
FortuneJ.C., & BenderM.M. (1989). Provisional guidelines for sampling in clinical research. In RoyeenC.B., (Ed.), Clinical research handbook an analysis for the service professions, (pp. 29–46). Thorofare, New Jersey: Slack.
32.
GibsonD. (1984). The dearth of mental health research in occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 4, 131–149.
33.
GilfoyleE.M., & ChristiansenC.H. (1987). Research: The quest for truth and the key to excellence. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 660–662.
34.
GlaserB. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12, 436–445.
35.
GoodrichD.W. (1954). The present status of research in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 8, 142–143/183–185.
36.
GreenwoodJ. (1984). Nursing research: A position paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 9, 77–82.
37.
HagedornR. (1995). Occupational therapy: Perspectives and processes. London: Churchill Livingstone.
38.
HathawayE. (1974). Research in occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41, 65–68.
39.
HunterJ.E. (1976). Research and occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 121–125.
40.
JacobE. (1987). Qualitative research traditions: A review. Review of Educational Research, 57, 1–50.
41.
KielhofnerG. (1997). Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: FA Davis.
OttL. (1988). An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis (3rd ed.). PWS Kent Publishing.
44.
OttenbacherK.J. (1985). Ritual, rigor, and relevance: The design of clinical research. American journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 202–203.
45.
OttenbacherK.J. (1986). Evaluating clinical change. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
46.
PainK.HaglerP., & WarrenS. (1996). Development of an instrument to evaluate the research orientation of clinical professionals. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 9, 93–100.
47.
PavalkoR.M. (1971). The occupation-profession continuum: A conceptual model. In P.R.M. (Eds.), Sociology of occupations and professions (pp. 15–43). Florida: F.E. Peacock Publishers.
48.
PelligrinoE.D. (1982). What is a profession?Journal of Allied Health, 12, 168–176.
49.
ReedK.L., & SandersonS.N. (1992). Concepts of occupational therapy. (3rd ed.) Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
50.
RogersJ.C. & HolmM.B. (1994). Accepting the challenge of outcome research: Examining the effectiveness of occupational therapy practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 871–876.
51.
ScottD. (1990). Practice Wisdom: The neglected source of practice research. Social Work, 35, 564–568.
52.
SimmsL.M.PriceS.A., & ErvineN.E. (1985). The professional practice of nursing administration. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
53.
SteinF. (1989). Anatomy of clinical research. Thorofare: Slack.
54.
StraussA. & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research-grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
55.
TaylorE. & MitchellM. (1990). Research attitudes and activities of occupational therapy clinicians. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 350–355.
56.
WaineM.Magill-EvansJ., & PainK. (1997). Alberta occupational therapists' perspectives on and participation in research. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 82–88.
57.
WallisM.A., (1987a). ‘Profession’ and ‘professionalism’ and the emerging profession of occupational therapy: Part 1. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 264–5.
58.
WallisM.A., (1987b). ‘Profession’ and ‘professionalism’ and the emerging profession of occupational therapy: Part 2. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50(9), 300–302.
