The objective of this survey was to describe assessment and treatment approaches commonly used by occupational therapists for children exhibiting handwriting and related fine motor difficulties. Secondarily, the application of weights as a treatment modality was also explored. Fifty experienced paediatric occupational therapists from Ontario (46%), Quebec (22%) and six other Canadian provinces, were surveyed by telephone. The majority of therapists indicated that they evaluated gross/fine motor and perceptual skills, motor planning, quality of movement and sensory functioning for this population, while psychosocial and environmental factors were often not formally evaluated. Evaluations most commonly utilized included the Beery, Bruininks-Oseretsky and Gardner Tests. Standardized handwriting assessments were rarely employed. All used an eclectic treatment approach with sensorimotor most frequently selected (90%). Work setting and years of experience did not influence the treatment approach favoured.
AlstonJ. (1983). A legibility index: Can handwriting be measured?Educational Review, 35, 237–240.
2.
AmundsonS.J. (1992). Handwriting: Evaluation and intervention in school settings. In Case-SmithJ.PehoskiC. (Eds.). Development of hand skills in the child (pp. 63–78). Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
3.
AmundsonS.J.WeilM. (1996). Prewriting and handwriting skills. In Case-SmithJ.AllenA.S.PrattP.N. (Eds.). Occupational therapy for children (pp. 524–541). St. Louis, MI: Mosby-Year Book.
4.
BeeryK. E.BuktenicaN.A. (1989). Developmental test of visual-motor integration-Revised. Chicago, IL: Follett Publishing.
5.
BenbowM. (1996). Course: Neurokinesthetic approach to hand function and handwriting. Organized by: Advanced Rehabilitation Institutes, Toronto, Ontario.
6.
BenbowM. (1995). Principles and practices of teaching handwriting. In HendersonA.PehoskiC. (Eds.), Hand function in the child: Foundations for remediation (pp. 255–281). St. Louis, MI: Mosby-Year Book.
7.
BonneyM.A. (1992). Understanding and assessing handwriting difficulty: Perspectives from the literature. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 39(3), 7–15.
8.
BruininksR.H. (1978). Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
9.
BundyA. (1995). Assessment and intervention in school-based practice: Answering questions and minimizing discrepancies. Occupational and Physical Therapy in Educational Environments, 69–88.
10.
CampbellS.K. (1989). Measurement in developmental therapy: Past, present and future. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 9, 1–14.
11.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1997) Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists 1996 Statistics, The National, 14, 6.
12.
CermakS.A. (1991). Fine motor functions and handwriting. In FisherA.G.MurrayE.A.BundyA. (Eds.), Sensory integration: Theory and practice (pp. 166–170). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
13.
CornhillH.Case-SmithJ. (1996). Factors that relate to good and poor handwriting. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 732–739.
14.
CroweT.K. (1989). Pediatric assessments: A survey of their use by occupational therapists in northwestern school systems. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 9, 273–286.
15.
DeGangiG.A.RoyeenC.B. (1994). Current practice among Neurodevelopmental Treatment Association members. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 803–809.
16.
FisherA.G. (1992). Functional measures, part 1: What is function, what should we measure, and how should we measure it?American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 183–185.
17.
GardnerM.F. (1982). Test of visual-perceptual skills (non-motor)- manual. Seattle, WA: Special Child Publications.
18.
GlinerJ.A. (1985). Purposeful activity in motor learning theory. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 28–34.
19.
Goodgold-EdwardsS.A.CermakS.A. (1990). Integrating motor control and motor learning concepts with neuropsychological perspectives on apraxia and developmental dyspraxia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 431–439.
20.
GrahamS. (1986). A review of handwriting scales and factors that contribute to variability in handwriting scores. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 63–71.
21.
Hamstra-BletzL.BloteA. (1990). Development of handwriting in primary school: A longitudinal study. Perceptual Motor Skills, 70, 759–770.
22.
JarusT. (1994). Motor learning and occupational therapy: The organization of practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 810–816.
23.
LawM.PolatajkoH.BaptisteS.TownsendE. (1997). Core concepts of occupational therapy. In Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective (pp. 29–56). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
24.
McHaleK.CermakS.A. (1992). Fine motor activities in elementary school: Preliminary findings and provisional implications for children with fine motor problems. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 898–903.
25.
MaelandA.E. (1992). Handwriting and perceptual motor skills in clumsy, dysgraphic, and normal children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 1207–1217.
26.
MatherN.RobertsR. (1995). Informal assessment and instruction in written language: A practitioner's guide for students with learning disabilities. Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing.
27.
PooleJ.L. (1991). Application of motor learning principles in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 531–537.
28.
ReismanJ.E. (1993). Development and reliability of the research version of the Minnesota Handwriting Test. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 13, 41–55.
29.
ReismanJ.E. (1991). Poor handwriting: Who is referred?American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 849–852.
30.
RodgerS. (1994). A survey of assessments used by paediatric occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 41, 137–142.
31.
SassoonR. (1990). Handwriting: A new perspective. Cheltenham, U.K.: Stanley Thornes.
32.
SchmidtR.A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
33.
SchneckC.M.HendersonA. (1990). Descriptive analysis of the developmental progression of grip position for pencil and crayon control in nondysfunctional children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 893–900.
34.
SmithR.O. (1992). The science of occupational therapy assessment. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 12, 3–15.
35.
StephensL.C.PrattP.N. (1989). School work tasks and vocational readiness. In PrattP.N.AllenA.S. (Eds.). Occupational therapy for children (2nd ed.). St. Louis: C.V. Mosby.
36.
Van HoutenR. (1993). The use of wrist weights to reduce self-injury maintained by sensory reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 197–203.
37.
WallenM.WalkerR. (1995). Occupational therapy practice with children with perceptual motor dysfunction: Findings of a literature review and survey. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 42, 15–25.
38.
WeilM.AmundsonS.J. (1993). Biomechanical aspects of handwriting in the educational setting. Introduction. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 13, 57–58.
39.
WeiserD. (1986). Handwriting: Assessment and remediation. Developmental Disabilities, Special Interest Section Newsletter, 9, 1–3; Rockville, MD: The American Occupational Therapy Association.
