As international collaborations increase, occupational therapists are becoming aware of the advantages of using consistent measures to compare outcomes of assessments across cultures. However, the translation of a measurement tool from one language to another may present issues that have to be addressed. This paper examines the advantages and issues related to the use of one tool, the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (AIMS). It meets the goals of the World Health Organization (WHO, 1980, 1993), and it appears to meet the purpose of users in several countries, thereby eliminating the need to develop a new tool. Instead, the AIMS has been translated into several languages. This paper examines three translated versions of the AIMS and discusses the issues related to the process of translation of the tool.
AndersonJ.J.FirscheinH.E., & MeenanR.F. (1989). Sensitivity of a health status measure to short-term clinical changes in arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 32, 844–850.
2.
ArchenholzB., & BjelleA. (1995). Evaluation of a Swedish version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS). Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 24(2), 64–68.
3.
BjelleA. (1991)) PA Functional status assessment. Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 3, 280–285.
4.
CarrA.J., & ThompsonP.W. (1994). Towards a measure of patient-perceived handicap in rheumatoid arthritis. British Journal of Rheumatology, 33, 378–382.
5.
Del GrecoL.WalopW., & EastridgeL. (1987). Questionnaire development: 3. Translation. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 136(8), 817–818.
6.
DuffyC.M.WatanabeDuffyK.N.GladmanD.D.BrubacherB.B.BuskilaD.LangevitzP., & FarewellV.T. (1992). The utility of the arthritis impact measurement scales for patients with psoriatic arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology, 19(11), 1727–1732.
7.
HacheyR.JumoortyJ., & MercierC. (1995). Methodology for validating the translation of test measurements applied to occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy International, 2(3), 190–203.
8.
HendricsonW.D.RusselI. J.PrihodaT.J.JacobsonJ.M.RoganA.BishopG.P., & CastilloR. (1989). Development and initial validation of a dual-language English-Spanish format for the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 32(9), 1153–1159.
9.
HughesS.L.EdelmanP.ChangR. W.SingerR.H., & SchuetteP. (1991). The GERI-AIMS. Reliability and validity of the arthritis impact measurement scales adapted for elderly respondents. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 34(7), 856–865.
10.
MasonJ.H.AndersonJ.J., & MeenanR.F. (1988). A model of health status for rheumatoid arthritis. A factor analysis of the Arthritic Measurement Scales. Arthritis Rheumatism, 31, 714–720.
11.
McDowellI., & NewellC. (1996). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
MeenanR.F.GertmanP.M., & MasonJ.H. (1980). Measuring health status in arthritis. The arthritis impact measurement scales. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 23, 146–152.
13.
MeenanR.F.GertmanP.M.MasonJ.M., & DunaifR. (1982). The arthritis impact measurement scales. Further investigations of a health status measure. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 25(9), 1048–1053.
14.
MeenanR.F.MasonJ.H.AndersonJ.J.GuccioneA.A., & KazisL.E. (1992). AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 35(1), 1–10.
15.
PicusT.CallahanL.F., & VaughnW.K. (1987). Questionnaire, walking time and button test measures of functional capacity as predictive markers for mortality in rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology, 14, 240–251.
16.
SalaffiF.FerracioliG.F.RiodaTroise W.CarottiM.SacchiniG., & CerviniC. (1992). The validity and the reliability of the Italian version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Recent Progress in Medicine, 83(1), 7–11.
17.
SampalisJ.S.PouchotJ.BeaudetF.CaretteS.GutkowskiA.HarthM.MyhalD.SenecalJ.-L.YeadonC.WilliamsI., & EsdaileJ.M. (1990). Arthritis impact measurement scales: Reliability of a French version and validity in adult Still's disease. Journal of Rheumatology, 17, 1657–1661.
18.
SchumacherH.R.KlipperJ.H., & KoopmanWJ. (1993). Primer on the rheumatic disease. Arthritis Foundation.
19.
StreinerD.L.NormanG.R. (1995). With measurement scales; a practical guide to their development and use. Devising the items (pp. 24–25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
TaalE.JacobsJ.W.SeydelE.R.WiegmanO., & RaskerJ.J. (1989). Evaluation of the clutch arthritis impact measurement scales (DUTCH-AIMS) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. British Journal of Rheumatology, 28, 487–491.
21.
VallerandR.J. (1989). Vers une méthodologie de validation transculturelle de questionnaires psychologique: Implications pour la recherche en langue francais. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 30, 662–680.
22.
World Health Organization (1980, 1993). Impairments. Classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Geneva: author.
