Abstract
Patient education is an important component of cardiac rehabilitation. It is also a portion of most other therapeutic interventions provided by occupational therapists. This study compared two methods for delivering patient education for inpatients recovering from coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. The traditional intervention was therapist-directed, whereas the collaborative intervention used shared control by the therapist and patients for structuring patient education sessions. When viewed as a whole, the two methods did not result in significantly different levels of knowledge of rehabilitation principles. However, a pretesting effect resulted in a significant difference in knowledge on the basis of whether or not subjects took a pretest, and this condition also interacted with group assignment. These relationships are explored with a recommendation that occupational therapists study whether pretesting effects can be used in a deliberate fashion to improve learning during patient education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
