HasselkusB. R. (1991). Qualitative research: Not another orthodoxy [Editorial]. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 11, 3–7.
2.
HubbellS. (1993). Broadsides from the other orders. A book of bugs. New York: Random House.
3.
JensenG. M. (1989). Qualitative methods in physical therapy research: A form of disciplined inquiry. Physical Therapy, 69, 492–500.
4.
KielhofnerG. (1982). Qualitative research. Part one: Paradigmatic grounds and issues of reliability and validity. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 2, 67–79.
5.
KreftingL. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 214–222.
OttenbacherK. (1992). Nationally speaking. Confusion in occupational therapy research: Does the end justify the method?American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 871–874.
8.
RigerS. (1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices. American Psychologist, 47, 730–740.
9.
SechrestL. (1992). Roots: Back to our first generation. Evaluation Practice, 13, 1–7.
10.
ShepardK. E.JensenG. M.SchmollB. J.HackL. M., & GwyerJ. (1993). Alternative approaches to research in physical therapy: Positivism and phemonomenology. Physical Therapy, 73, 88–97.
11.
Short-DeGraffM. A., & FisherA. (1993). Nationally speaking: A proposal for diverse research methods and a common research language. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 295–297.
12.
YerxaE. J. (1991). Nationally speaking: Seeking a relevant, ethical, and realistic way of knowing for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 199–204.
