Critical Assessment of Qualitative Research

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hasselkus

B. R.

(1991). Qualitative research: Not another orthodoxy [Editorial]. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 11, 3–7.

Hubbell

(1993). Broadsides from the other orders. A book of bugs. New York: Random House.

Jensen

G. M.

(1989). Qualitative methods in physical therapy research: A form of disciplined inquiry. Physical Therapy, 69, 492–500.

Kielhofner

(1982). Qualitative research. Part one: Paradigmatic grounds and issues of reliability and validity. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 2, 67–79.

Krefting

(1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 214–222.

Mattingly

(1993). Commentary. Physical Therapy, 73, 98–100.

Ottenbacher

(1992). Nationally speaking. Confusion in occupational therapy research: Does the end justify the method? American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 871–874.

Riger

(1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices. American Psychologist, 47, 730–740.

Sechrest

(1992). Roots: Back to our first generation. Evaluation Practice, 13, 1–7.

10.

Shepard

K. E.

Jensen

G. M.

Schmoll

B. J.

Hack

L. M.

, & Gwyer

(1993). Alternative approaches to research in physical therapy: Positivism and phemonomenology. Physical Therapy, 73, 88–97.

11.

Short-DeGraff

M. A.

, & Fisher

(1993). Nationally speaking: A proposal for diverse research methods and a common research language. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 295–297.

12.

Yerxa

E. J.

(1991). Nationally speaking: Seeking a relevant, ethical, and realistic way of knowing for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 199–204.