The purpose of our study was to determine the reliability of the model PC5030PT computerized Jamar dynamometer (J. A. Preston, Jackson, MI). A test-retest reliability study was conducted in which 33 normal subjects were tested three times over a 6-week period. Standard procedures for assessing grip strength were followed. Both left and right hands were tested. We quantified three characteristics of the force curve: (a) the slope of the rise in force, (b) the maximal or peak force, and (c) the mean sustained force over the last 3 sec of a 5-sec contraction. Reliability was good with intraclass reliability coefficients ranging from .84 to .93. We conclude that the computerized Jamar will yield reliable measurement of grip strength if the instrument is calibrated properly and if standardized procedures for grip strength testing are followed.
Bear-LehmanJ., & AbreuB. C. (1989). Evaluating the hand: Issues in reliability and validity. Physical Therapy, 69, 1025–1033.
2.
ChengalurS. N.SmithG. A.NelsonR. C.SadoffS. J., & SadoffA. M. (1990). Assessing sincerity of effort in maximal grip strength tests. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 148–153.
3.
CurrierD. P. (1990). Elements of research in physical therapy (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
4.
EricsonW. B.Jr. (1992). Computerized evaluation of the hand. Seminars in Orthopaedics, 7, 58–67.
5.
FessE. E. (1982). The effects of Jaymar [sic] dynamometer handle position and test protocol on normal grip strength (Abstract). Journal of Hand Surgery, 7A, 308–309.
6.
FessE. E. (1986). The need for reliability and validity in hand assessment instruments. Journal of Hand Surgery, 11A, 621–623.
7.
FessE. E. (1987). A method for checking Jamar dynamometer calibration. Journal of Hand Therapy, 1, 28–32.
8.
FessE. E., & MoranC. A. (1981). Clinical assessment recommendations. Gamer, NC: American Society of Hand Therapists.
9.
FessE. E., & PhillipsC. A. (1987). Hand splinting: Principles and methods. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.
10.
Flood-JoyM., & MathiowetzV. (1987). Grip-strength measurement: A comparison of three Jamar dynamometers. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 7, 235–243.
11.
GilbertJ. C., & KnowltonR. G. (1983). Simple method to determine sincerity of effort during a maximal isometric test of grip strength. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 62, 135–144.
12.
HinsonM.WoodardJ., & GenchB. (1990). Reliability of the Jamar digital dynamometer model 2A. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 10, 108–110.
13.
KellorM.FrostJ.SilberbergN.IversenI., & CummingsR. (1971). Hand strength and dexterity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25, 77–83.
14.
KroemerK. H. E., & MarrasW. S. (1981). Evaluation of maximal and submaximal static muscle exertions. Human Factors, 23, 643–653.
15.
LambR. L.MoranC. A., & MayhewT. P. (1989). Forward: Hand management in physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 69, 13.
16.
MarionR., & NiebuhrB. R. (1992). A warm-up effect prior to maximal grip contractions. Journal of Hand Therapy, 5, 143–146.
17.
MathiowetzV. (1990a). Grip and pinch strength measurements. In AmundsenL. (Ed.), Muscle strength testing: Instrumented and non-instrumented systems (pp. 163–177). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
18.
MathiowetzV. (1990b). Use of three trials on grip and pinch strength measurements. Journal of Hand Therapy, 3, 195–198.
19.
MathiowetzV.KashmanN.VollandG.WeberK.DoweM., & RogersS. (1985). Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66, 69–72.
20.
MathiowetzV.RennellsC., & DonahoeL. (1985). Effect of elbow position on grip and key pinch strength. Journal of Hand Surgery, 10A, 694–697.
21.
MathiowetzV.WeberK.VollandG., & KashmanN. (1984). Reliability and validity of hand strength evaluations. Journal of Hand Surgery, 9A, 222–226.
22.
MathiowetzV.WiemerD. M., & FedermanS. M. (1986). Grip and pinch strength: Norms for 6- to 9-year olds. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 705–711.
23.
ParentL. H. (1989). Orthopedic conditions. In TromblyC. A. (Ed.), Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction (3rd ed., pp. 531–542). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
24.
PollardJ. H. (1977). A handbook of numerical and statistical techniques. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
ShroutP. E., & FleissJ. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.
26.
SmithG. A.NelsonR. C.SadoffS. J., & SadoffA. M. (1989). Assessing sincerity of effort in maximal grip strength tests. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68, 74–80.
27.
WinerB. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
