Evidence of predictive validity is an essential basis for the selection and use of a screening instrument. In the area of developmental screening such information is typically assessed by two methods: correlational analysis and classificational analysis. This paper describes each methodology and reviews their relative advantages and disadvantages in relation to the early identification of developmental handicaps and risks.
American Psychological Association (1985). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
AnastasiA. (1988). Psychological Testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
3.
BowermanB., & O'ConnellR. (1979). Time series and forecasting. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.
4.
BrackenB. A. (1987). Limitations of preschool instruments and standards for minimal levels of technical adequacy. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 313–326.
5.
BrewerG. D., & KakalickJ. S. (1979). Handicapped children: Strategies for improving services. New York: McGraw Hill.
6.
CronbachL. (1970). Essentials of psychological testings. New York: Harper & Row.
7.
CronbachL., & GleserG. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions. Urbana: University of Illinois.
8.
DarlingtonR. (1975). Radicals and squares. Ithaca, NY: Logan Hill Press.
9.
DrillienC., & DrummondM. (1983). Development screening and the child with special needs. (Clinics in Developmental Medicine No. 86.) Philadelphia: Lippincott.
10.
DunstC. J., & RheingroverR. M. (1981). Discontinuity and stability in early development: Implications for assessment. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 3(1), 14–28.
11.
FletcherJ., & SatzP. (1982). Kindergarten prediction of reading achievement: A seven year longitudinal follow-up. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 681–686.
12.
FrankenburgW., & NorthA. (1974). A guide to screening for the EPDST program under Medicaid. Washington, D.C.: Social and Rehabilitation Services, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
13.
GayL. R. (1980). Educational evaluation and measurement. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing.
14.
FowlerGlenn M., & CrossA. W. (1986). Preschool risk factors as predictors of early school performance. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 7, 237–241.
15.
GuilfordJ. P. (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
HowellD. C. (1982). Statistical methods for psychology. Boston: PWS Publishers.
17.
JohnsonE. (1975). Multidisciplinary evaluation of learning and behavior. Journal of American Osteopathic Association, 74, 764–769.
18.
LawM. C., & PolatajkoH. J. (1987). Diagnostic tests in Occupational Therapy: A model for evaluation. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 7, 111–122.
19.
LewisA. (1980). The early identification of children with learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 51–57.
20.
LichtensteinR. (1981). Comparative validity of two preschool screening tests: Correlational and classificational approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 68–72.
21.
LichtensteinR., & IretonJ. (1984). Preschool screening: Identifying young children with developmental and educational problems. New York: Grune & Stratton, Inc.
22.
LiebermanS.CohenA. H.StolzbergM., & RittyJ. M. (1985). Validation study of the New York State Optometric Association (NYSOA) vision screening battery. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 62, 165–168.
23.
LinnR. (1983). Pearson selection formulas: Implications for studies of predictive bias and estimates of educational effects in selected samples. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 1–15.
24.
McCallR. B. (1982). A hard look at stimulating and predicting development: The cases of bonding and screening. Pediatrics in Review, 3, 205–212.
25.
MeehlP., & RosenA. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 194–216.
26.
MeiselsS. J. (1988). Developmental screening in early childhood: The interaction of research and social policy. Annual Review of Public Health, 9, 527–550.
27.
MeiselsS. J.WiskeM. S., & TivnanT. (1984). Predicting school performance with the Early Screening Inventory. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 25–33.
28.
MillerL. J. (1988). Miller Assessment for Preschoolers. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
29.
MillerL. J., & SchoutenP. G. W. (1988). Age-related effects on the predictive validity of the Miller Assessment for Preschoolers. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 6, 99–106.
30.
National Center for Clinical Infant Programs. (1986). Infants Can't Wait, The Numbers. Washington, D.C.: Author.
31.
National Center for Clinical Infant Programs. (1989). The Intent and Spirit of P.L. 99–457, A Source Book. Washington, D.C.: Author.
32.
RubinR. A., & BalowB. (1980). Infant neurological abnormalities as indicators of cognitive impairments. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 22, 336–343.
33.
RubinR. A.BalowB.DorleJ., & RosenM. (1978). Preschool prediction of low achievement in basic school skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 62–65.
34.
SaxG. (1974). Standards for educational and psychological tests and manuals. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
