This exploratory study used qualitative research methods to identify values that influence clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. Through an interview format, selected occupational therapists were asked to respond to a predetermined list of questions about a general case study. The interviews were tape-recorded and a content analysis of the tapes yielded 18 distinct value statements. Implications of the findings and recommendations for further studies are presented. Qualitative research methodology is examined for its utility in occupational therapy.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (1978). Member handbook. Rockville, MD: Author.
2.
BingR. K. (1986). Perspectives on values underlying occupational therapy practice. Occupational therapy education: Target 2000. Proceedings of forum on promoting excellence in education (pp. 21–24). Rockville, MD: The American Occupational Therapy Association.
3.
CoxR. C.WestW. L. (1986). Fundamentals of research for health professionals (2nd ed.). Rockville, MD: The American Occupational Therapy Foundation.
4.
EngelhardtH. T. (1986). The importance of values in shaping professional direction and behavior. Occupational therapy education: Target 2000. Proceedings of forum on promoting excellence in education (pp. 39.44). Rockville, MD: The American Occupational Therapy Association.
5.
FisherA. G. (1986). Research values of occupational therapists. Occupational therapy education: Target 2000. Proceedings of forum on promoting excellence in education (pp. 25–28). Rockville, MD: The American Occupational Therapy Association.
6.
FoxJ. V. D. (1981). Occupational therapy theory development: Knowledge and values held by recent graduates. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 1, 79–93.
7.
GilkesonG. E.HantenW. P. (1984). A comparative analysis of occupational therapy graduates from baccalaureate and entry-level master's degree programs. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 4, 67–91.
8.
GilletteN. P.MattinglyC. (1987). Clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41, 555–561.
9.
GlaserB. L.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
10.
GladD. D. (1967). Operational values in psychotherapy. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
HansenR. A. (1986). Occupational therapy values education: How and why. Occupational Therapy Education: Target 2000. Proceedings of forum on promoting excellence in education (pp. 19–20). Rockville, MD: The American Occupational Therapy Association.
12.
HopkinsH. L.TiffanyE. G. (1983). Occupational therapy—A problem-solving process. In HopkinsH. L.SmithH. D. (Eds.), Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy (6th Ed.). Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company.
13.
IvesE. D. (1974). The tape-recorded interview: A manual for field workers in folklore and oral history. Knoxville, The University of Tennessee Press.
14.
JohnsonJ. A. (1981). Old values—New directions: Competence, adaptation, integration. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 35, 590–598.
15.
KielhofnerG. (1982a). Qualitative research: Part one: Paradigmatic grounds and issues of reliability and validity. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 2, 67–79.
16.
KielhofnerG. (1982b). Qualitative research: Part two: Methodological approaches and relevance to occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 2, 150–164.
17.
KluckhohnC. (1962). Values and value orientations in the theory of action. In ParsonsT.ShilsE. A. (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action. New York: Harper & Row.
18.
MeyerA. (1977). The philosophy of occupation therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31, 639–642.
19.
MorrisC. V. (1956). Varieties of human values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
NeuhausB. E. (1988). Ethical considerations in clinical reasoning: The impact of technology and cost containnent. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 288–294.
21.
OttenbacherK. J. (1986). Evaluating clinical change. Strategies for occupational and physical therapists. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
22.
ParhamD. (1987). Nationally speaking—Toward professionalism: The reflective therapist. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41, 555–561.
23.
PellegrinoE. D.ThomasmaD. C. (1981). A philosophical basis for medical practice: Toward a philosophy and ethic of the healing professions. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
RogersC. R. (1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
25.
RogersJ. C. (1983). Eleanor Clarke Slagle lectureship—1983; Clinical reasoning: The ethics, science and art. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37, 601–616.
26.
RogersJ. C.MannW. H. (1980). The relationship between professional productivity and educational level, part 2. Results and discussion. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 460–468.
27.
RogersJ. C.MasagataniG. (1982). Clinical reasoning of occupational therapists during the initial assessment of physically disabled patients. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 2, 195–219.
28.
RokeachM. (1979). Understanding human values: Individual and societal. New York: Free Press.
29.
SabariJ. S. (1985). Professional socialization: Implications for occupational therapy education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 96–102.
30.
SanchezV. (1964). Relevance of cultural views for occupational therapy programs. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18, 1–5.
31.
SteinJ. (Ed.). (1983). The Random House dictionary of the English language. New York: Random House.
32.
Von MehringO. (1961). A grammar of human values. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
33.
YerxaE. (1979). The philosophical base of occupational therapy. Occupational therapy: 2001 A.D. Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.
