This study reports results from an investigation of reward systems in occupational therapy education. Full-time occupational therapy faculty in baccalaureate and postbaccalaureate programs were surveyed (N = 275) and asked to rate a list of possible work-related rewards for potential importance of each to the individual respondent. Results highlighted the value that faculty place on intrinsically rewarding aspects of their work. Factor analysis revealed four main dimensions of rewards: economic, research related, teaching/service related, and social/environmental. These types of rewards are discussed in relation to enhancing research productivity among occupational therapy faculty.
BlandC. J.SchmitzC. C. (1986). Characteristics of the successful researcher and implications for faculty development. Journal of Medical Education, 61, 22–31.
2.
CalderB. J.StawB. M. (1975). Self-perception of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 599–605.
3.
CondryJ. (1977). Enemies of exploration: Self-initiated versus other-initiated learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 459–477.
4.
DeciE. L. (1972). The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 217–229.
5.
GustadJ. W. (1960). The career decisions of college teachers (SREB Research Monograph Series No. 2). Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
6.
JantzenA. C. (1974). Academic occupational therapy: A career specialty. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28, 73–81.
7.
JohnsonJ. A. (1978). Issues in education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 32, 355–358.
8.
KimJ.MuellerC. W. (1978). Factor analysis—Statistical methods and practical issues (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 07-014). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
9.
LabovitzD. R. (1986). Faculty research: A pluralistic approach. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 207–209.
10.
LewisD. R.BeckerW. E. (Eds.). (1979). Academic rewards in higher education. Cambridge: Ballinger.
11.
MarshJ. F.StaffordF. P. (1967). The effects of values on pecuniary behavior: The case of academicians. American Sociological Review, 32, 740–754.
12.
McKeachieW. J. (1979). Perspectives from psychology: Financial incentives are ineffective for faculty. In LewisD. R.BeckerW. E. (Eds.), Academic rewards in higher education (pp. 3–20). Cambridge: Ballinger.
13.
OttenbacherK. J.BarrisR.Van DeusenJ. (1986). Some issues related to research utilization in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 111–116.
14.
ParhamD. (1985a). Academic reward structures and occupational therapy faculty. Part I: Characteristics of faculty. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 5, 83–100.
15.
ParhamD. (1985b). Academic reward structures and occupational therapy faculty. Part II: Predictors of rewards and scholarly productivity. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 5, 139–153.
16.
ParhamD. (1987). Brief: The perceived impact of research on the activities and evaluation of occupational therapy faculty. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 7, 126–128.
17.
StawB. M. (1983). Motivation research versus the art of faculty management. Review of Higher Education, 6, 301–321.
18.
TanguayP. E. (1985). Does occupational therapy belong in the university?American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 466–468.
19.
TuckmanH. P. (1976). Publication, teaching, and the academic reward structure. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
