Academic Reward Structures and Occupational Therapy Faculty Part I: Characteristics of Faculty

Abstract

This study examined academic rewards in occupational therapy education through a survey of baccalaureate and postbaccalaureate programs. Questionnaires from 275 full-time faculty were analyzed Results are presented in two parts Part One describes faculty characteristics, and predictors of rewards and publications are identified in Part II. Analysis of the sample shows that OT faculty are younger, hold lower academic ranks and degrees, and are less often tenured than most faculty in higher education. They also are relatively new in their programs, suggesting a high rate of turnover. Publication rates vary according to the research orientation of institutions in which the faculty work, a pattern that is consistent with higher education overall However, publication rates of OT faculty are about 20% lower than those of other faculty. This may be an indication that OT academic reward systems do not place as much emphasis on publications as is found in traditional academe.

Keywords

allied health education research publication tenure survey

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Council on Education. (1981). 1981–1982 fact book. Washington, DC: Author.

Astin

H. S.

(1983, March). Faculty incentives and the underprepared student. Invited address delivered to the American Association on Higher Education, Washington, DC.

Astin

H. S.

Bayer

A. E.

(1979). Pervasive sex differences in the academic reward system: Scholarship, marriage, and what else? In Lewis

D. R.

Becker

W. E.

(Eds.), Academic rewards in higher education (pp. 211–229). Cambridge: Ballinger.

Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. (1973). A classification of institutions of higher education. Berkeley: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Centra

J. A.

(1980). College enrollment in the 1980s. Journal of Higher Education, 51, 18–39.

Freeman

R. B.

(1979). The job market for college faculty. In Lewis

D. R.

Becker

W. E.

(Eds.), Academic rewards in higher education. Cambridge: Ballinger.

Fulton

Trow

(1974). Research activity in American higher education. Sociology of Education, 47, 29–73.

Glenny

L. S.

(1980). Demographic and related issues for higher education in the 1980s. Journal of Higher Education, 51, 363–380.

Gunne

G. M.

Wise

S. A.

(1980). Organizational aspects of schools of allied health professions. Journal of Allied Health, 9(1), 49–58.

10.

Holcomb

J. D.

Roush

R. E.

(1977). Faculty appointments, promotions, and tenure policies in the allied health professions. Journal of Allied Health, 6(2), 24–27.

11.

Isaac

Michael

W. B.

(1977). Handbook in research and evaluation. San Diego: Edits.

12.

Jantzen

A. C.

(1974). Academic occupational therapy—A career specialty. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28, 73–81.

13.

Johnson

J. A.

(1978). Issues in education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 32, 355–358.

14.

Ladd

E. C.

(1979). The work experience of American college professors: Some data and an argument. Current Issues in Higher Education, 1979(2), 3–12.

15.

Lanier

R. A.

Hedl

J. J.

Christiansen

C. H.

(1983). Faculty evaluation practices among occupational therapy chairpersons: A comparative study. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 3, 141–163.

16.

Lewis

D. R.

Becker

W. E.

(Eds.). (1979). Academic rewards in higher education. Cambridge: Ballinger.

17.

Robinson

T. C.

(1978). A study of promotion and tenure in schools of allied health. Journal of Allied Health, 7(1), 49–56.

18.

Tuckman

H. P.

(1976). Publication, teaching and the academic reward structure. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

19.

Tuckman

H. P.

(1979). The academic reward structure in American higher education. In Lewis

D. R.

Becker

W. E.

(Eds.), Academic rewards in higher education (pp. 165–190). Cambridge: Ballinger.