Mood and Affect following Success and Failure in Two Cultural Groups

Abstract

Occupational therapy theorists and others have stated that success and failure in activities play important roles in the development of a generalized sense of competence in occupational performance In this study it was hypothesized that a success experience and a failure experience would elicit different moods and affects in participants, and that people from different cultural backgrounds would respond to success and failure differently. Twenty Chinese graduate students currently enrolled in U.S. graduate schools and 20 U.S. graduate students participated in this study. The semantic differential technique and the Bipolar Form of the Profile of Mood States (POMS-BI) were used as dependent variables In addition to success-failure and nationality, gender inadvertently was found to be a significant predictor of responses and was treated as the third independent variable Results revealed that across the nationalities and across the sexes, the success experience resulted in significantly more positive moods and affects than the failure experience on all dependent variables. The only significant interaction between nationality and success-failure occurred on the composed-anxious factor of the POMS-BI, such that the Chinese group felt especially composed after the success activity in comparison with the American group. Females' moods were generally lower than males' on pre-activity, post-success, and post-failure measurements.

Keywords

activity analysis competency cross-cultural differences emotion gender

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allard

(1964). Our professional judgment, sound or haphazard? American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18, 104–107.

Brislin

R. W.

(1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In Triandis

H. C.

Berry

J. W.

(Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, methodology (Vol. 2, pp. 389–444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Confucian Analects. (1966). The four books ( Legge

, Trans.). New York: Paragon Book Reprint Corp.

Cynkin

(1979). Occupational therapy: Toward health through activities. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.

Fidler

G. S.

(1948). Psychological evaluation of occupational therapy activities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2, 284–287.

Fidler

G. S.

Fidler

J. W.

(1963). Occupational therapy: A communication process in psychiatry. New York: Macmillan.

Fox

J. V. D.

Jirgal

(1967). Therapeutic properties of activities as examined by the Clinical Council of the Wisconsin Schools of Occupational Therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 21, 29–33.

Hopkins

H. L.

(1978). A historical perspective on occupational therapy. In Hopkins

H. L.

Smith

H. D.

(Eds.), Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy (5th ed.) (pp. 3–23). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.

Hopkins

H. L.

Tiffany

E. G.

(1978). Occupational therapy—A problem solving process. In Hopkins

H. L.

Smith

H. D.

(Eds.), Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy (5th ed.) (pp. 109–122). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.

10.

Kerlinger

F. N.

(1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

11.

Kielhofner

(1980). A model of human occupation, part 3. Benign and vicious cycles. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 731–737.

12.

Kielhofner

Burke

J. P.

Igi

C. H.

(1980). A model of human occupation, part 4. Assessment and intervention. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 777–788.

13.

Lorr

McNair

(1982). Profile of mood states, bipolar form (POMS-BI). San Diego: Educational & Industrial Testing Service.

14.

McNair

D. M.

Lorr

Droppleman

L. F.

(1971). FITS manual for the profile of mood states. San Diego: Educational & Industrial Testing Service.

15.

McReynolds

Guevara

(1967). Attitudes of schizophrenics and normals toward success and failure. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72, 303–310.

16.

Meyer

(1922). The philosophy of occupation therapy. Archives of Occupational Therapy, 1, 1–10.

17.

Nelson

D. L.

Thompson

Moore

J. A.

(1982). Identification of factors of affective meaning in four selected activities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 381–387.

18.

Osgood

C. E.

May

W. H.

Miron

M. S.

(1975). Cross-cultural universal of affective meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

19.

Osgood

C. E.

Suci

G. J.

Tannenbaum

P. H.

(1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

20.

Slade

Falkowski

Muwonge

A. K.

Slade

(1975). Immediate psychological effects of various occupational therapy activities on psychiatric patients: A pilot study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38, 172–173.

21.

Smith

M. B.

(1974). Competence and adaptation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28, 11–15.

22.

Smith

P. A.

Barrows

H. S.

Whitney

J. N.

(1959). Psychological attributes of occupational therapy crafts. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 13, 16–21, 25–26.

23.

Stephan

W. G.

Gollwitzer

P. M.

(1981). Affect as a mediator of attributional egotism. Joumal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 443–458.

24.

Tseng

Hsu

(1969–70). Chinese culture, personality formation and mental illness. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 16, 5–14.

25.

Yeh

(1972). The Chinese mind and human freedom. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 18, 132–136.

26.

E. S. H.

(1980). Chinese collective orientation and need for achievement. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 26, 184–189.