Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to elucidate the occupational challenges of re-entrants. Convenience and snowball recruitment strategies were used to solicit participants for this exploratory, interpretive phenomenological approach study. Five re-entry service providers and four re-entrants completed extensive interviews. Three levels of open, axial coding were completed with the transcripts. Two primary contexts were acknowledged between service providers and re-entrants: Barriers and Successful Reintegration. Themes were identified: Appreciating Re-entrants’ Narratives, Person Centered Approach, Networking and Relationships, and Process & Transformation. Service providers perceived re-entrants as focusing on stability in the re-entrants’ lives. Re-entrants reflected on their occupational engagement to include obtaining employment, maintaining mental health stability, and adapting to the demands of society. The results suggest a need to better understand the unique and individual needs of re-entrants and the complexity of occupational engagement and co-occupations within community re-entry.

Plain Language Summary

Beliefs About How Someone Returns to the Community After Being Released From Prison and the Challenges of Daily Life: Thoughts From Individuals Who Were Released Back to the Community (Re-entrants) and Those Who Provide Needed Services to Those Individuals

Previous research indicates the multiple challenges that re-entrants face when returning to the community. However, it is not clear from the research how those challenges are understood in everyday life activities. The purpose of the study was to highlight the perspectives of re-entrants and re-entry service providers on the challenges of returning to the community after incarceration. Individuals were recruited through various community agencies that provide services to re-entrants. Four re-entrants completed extensive interviews, communicating their experiences of living and working in the community. Five re-entry service providers shared their experiences when providing assistance to re-entrants. The re-entrants and the service providers shared what they believed to be barriers to living and working in the community and what it meant to be successful in their return to daily life. Themes throughout the interviews included the importance of appreciating the re-entrants’ stories, past and present, and the need to see the unique needs of each re-entrant, known as a client-centered approach. All participants spoke about the value of relationships and the significance of connecting with people and organizations throughout the process of re-entry. The service providers and re-entrants believed what was needed to find stability in their lives included obtaining employment, maintaining mental health stability, and adjusting to the demands of society; however, the results also suggest a more complex relationship with the service providers in engaging with these occupations. The re-entrants spoke of how their lives change through these relationships. The results suggest a need for service providers to understand the unique and individual needs of re-entrants and the complexity of engaging in daily life. The ongoing activities needed for successful re-entry, where both the re-entrant and another individual participate, referenced as co-occupations, require additional time and energy.

Keywords

occupational performance community participation co-occupation vulnerable populations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alase

(2017). The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A guide to a good qualitative research approach. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 5(2), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.9

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2020). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (4th ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74, 7412410010. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001

Archibald

(2016). Investigator triangulation: A collaborative strategy with potential for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815570092

Baker

(2020). Community reentry of ex-offenders: An exploration of occupational performance and community reintegration [Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis].

Barnett

E. S.

Lopez

Chung

P. J.

(2020). Barriers to health care for Latino youths during community reentry after incarceration: Los Angeles County, California, 2016-2018. American Journal of Public Health, 110(51), S63–S70. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305374

Bass

J. D.

Marchant

J. K.

de Sam Lazaro

S. L.

Baum

C. M.

(2024). Application of the Person–Environment–Occupation–Performance Model: A scoping review. OTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 44(3), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492241238951

Baum

C. M.

Christiansen

C. H.

Bass

J. D.

(2015). The Person-Environment-Occupation- Performance (PEOP) model. In Christiansen

C. H.

Baum

C. M.

Bass

J. D.

(Eds.), Occupational therapy: Performance, participation, and well-being (4th ed., pp. 49–56). SLACK Incorporated.

Berghuis

(2018). Reentry programs for adult male offender recidivism and reintegration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 62(14), 4655–4676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X18778448

Birt

Scott

Cavers

Campbell

Walter

(2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870

10.

Carmenza Mejia

Kowalchuk

Sunny

Scamp

. (2024). Expanding treatment, recovery, and reentry services for female offenders: Improving outcomes through client-centered interventions. Community Mental Health Journal, 60, 713–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-023-01223-w

11.

Clark

M. G.

Metcalfe

R. E.

Caffery

C. M.

Conn

A. D.

Kjellstrand

J. M.

(2023). Parenting through re-entry: Ecologically-grounded perspectives of parents returning to the community after incarceration. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 32, 2465–2481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-023-02621-0

12.

Conner

B. T.

Longshore

Anglin

M. D.

(2009). Modeling attitude toward drug treatment: The role of internal motivation, external pressure, and dramatic relief. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 36(2), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-008-9119-1

13.

The Council of State of State Governments Justice Center (GSG). (2024). 50 States, 1 Goal: Examining State-Level Recidivism Trends in the Second Chance Act Era. https://csgjusticecenter.org/publications/50-states-1-goal/

14.

Dewey

Wesely

Epler

Connolly

Zare

Bratton

(2018). Ontologies of blame and the cultural value of accountability: Formerly incarcerated women’s narratives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317733284

15.

Dillon

M. B.

Dillon

T. H.

Griffiths

Prusnek

Tippie

(2020). The distinct value of occupational therapy in corrections: Implementation of a life skills program in a county jail. Annals of International Occupational Therapy, 3(4), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.3928/24761222-20200309-01

16.

Franke

N. D.

Treglia

Cnaan

R. A.

(2017). Reentry program and social work education: Training the next generation of criminal justice social workers. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 14(6), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2017.1367345

17.

Grossi

L. M.

(2017). Sexual offenders, violent offenders, and community reentry: Challenges and treatment considerations. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.04.005

18.

Jaegers

Dillon

M. B.

Dieleman

Muñoz

J. P.

Rogers

Barney

Cepon

Hoeferkamp

Topiwal

(2022). Justice-Based OT: Advancing occupational justice through a collaborative network. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(Supp. 1). https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2022.76S1-PO112

19.

James

(2014). Offender reentry: Correctional statistics, reintegration into the community, and recidivism. Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34287.pdf

20.

Liem

Richardson

(2014). The role of transformation narratives in desistance among released lifers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(6), 692–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813515445

21.

McMurran

Ward

(2004). Motivating offenders to change in therapy: An organizing framework. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 295–311.

22.

Moore

K. E.

Hacker

R. L.

Oberleitner

McKee

S. A.

(2020). Reentry interventions that address substance use: A systematic review. Psychological Services, 17(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000293

23.

Pickens

N. D.

Pizur-Barnekow

(2009). Co-occupation: Extending the dialogue. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(3), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686656

24.

Saldina

(2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.

25.

Schindler

(2019). Introduction to the issue on OT and the criminal justice system. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 35(3), 217–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/0164212X.2019.1644719

26.

Serin

R. C.

Lloyd

C. D.

(2009). Examining the process of offender change: The transition to crime desistance. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(4), 347–364. https://10.1080/10683160802261078

27.

Sinko

DeAngelis

Alphajora

Beker

Kramer

(2020). Experience of stigma post incarceration: A qualitative study. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 8(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1610

28.

Stevens

(2012). I am the person now I was always meant to be: Identity reconstruction and narrative reframing in therapeutic community prisons. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 12, 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895811432958

29.

Sundaresh

Roy

Riley

Wildeman

Wang

E. A.

(2020). Exposure to the US criminal legal system and well-being: A 2018 cross-sectional study. American Journal of Public Health, 110, S116–S122. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305414

30.

Troshynski

E. I.

Willis

Forrai

(2024). Integrating justice-involved voices: The role of experiential knowledge in shaping reentry support programs. Journal of Crime and Justice, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2024.2427874

31.

Valera

Brotzman

L. E.

Wilson

Reid

(2017). “It’s hard to reenter when you’ve been locked out”: Keys to offender reintegration. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 56, 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2017.1339159

32.

Wolfinger

(2002). On writing fieldnotes: Collection strategies and background expectancies. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001640

Service Providers’ and Re-entrants’ Perspectives of Community Re-entry and Community Reintegration Programs After Incarceration

Abstract

Plain Language Summary

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References