The Ambiguity of Parenting Adult Children With Substance Use Disorder

Abstract

French

Background. Substance Use Disorder can impede parent–child relationships. The Theory of Ambiguous Loss provides a structure for occupational therapy practitioners in developing interventions to support the parent–child relationship. Purpose. This study explores the roles of parents of adult children diagnosed with Substance Use Disorder in the context of the Theory of Ambiguous Loss. Method. Volunteer participants were recruited from three urban parental support groups. Inclusion criteria were involved in a support group and having an adult child diagnosed with Substance Use Disorder. Eight mothers and one father participated in semi-structured interviews using a phenomenological approach. Themes and structural descriptions were developed. Findings. Five themes were identified: hopeful coping, occupational interference, changes in social constructs and participation, burdenful caregiving and receiving, and blending of occupations. Themes offer intervention considerations for occupational therapy. Implications. Research provides additional conceptual consideration to build occupation-centered interventions for parents and their adult children in Substance Use Disorder recovery.

Keywords

Ambiguous loss Co-occupation Co-occupational role ambiguity Occupation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bengtsson

(2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001

Boss

(1999). Insights. Ambiguous loss: Living with frozen grief. Harvard Mental Health Letter, 16(5), 4–5.

Boss

P. G.

(2006). Loss, trauma, and resilience: Therapeutic work with ambiguous loss. WW Norton & Co.

Boss

Caron

Horbal

Mortimer

(1990). Predictors of depression in caregivers of dementia patients: Boundary ambiguity and mastery. Family Process, 29(3), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1990.00245.x

Boss

Greenberg

(1984). Family boundary ambiguity: A new variable in family stress theory. Family Process, 23(4), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1984.00535.x

Charon

(2001). Narrative medicine: Form, function, and ethics. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134(1), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-134-1-200101020-00024

Creswell

J. W.

Poth

C. N.

(2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dekel

Levinstein

Siegel

Fridkin

Svetlitzky

(2016). Secondary traumatization of partners of war veterans: The role of boundary ambiguity. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000163

DiCicco-Bloom

Crabtree

B. F.

(2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x

10.

Frank

J. B.

(2007). Evidence for grief as the major barrier faced by Alzheimer caregivers: A qualitative analysis. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias, 22(6), 516–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317507307787

11.

Gogel

L. P.

Cavaleri

M. A.

Gardin

J. G.

Wisdom

J. P.

(2011). Retention and ongoing participation in residential substance abuse treatment: Perspectives from adolescents, parents and staff on the treatment process. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 38(4), 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-010-9226-7

12.

Groenewald

Bhana

(2016). ‘It was bad to see my [child] doing this’: Mothers’ experiences of living with adolescents with substance abuse problems. International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction, 14(5), 646–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-015-9605-7

13.

Hyde

(2000). Recognising deductive processes in qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 3(2), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750010322089

14.

Kelly

J. F.

Bergman

Hoeppner

B. B.

Vilsaint

White

W. L.

(2017). Prevalence and pathways of recovery from drug and alcohol problems in the United States population: Implications for practice, research, and policy. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 181, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.028

15.

Lander

Howsare

Byrne

(2013). The impact of substance use disorders on families and children: From theory to practice. Social Work in Public Health, 28(3-4), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2013.759005

16.

Mechling

B. M.

Ahern

N. R.

Palumbo

(2018). Applying ambiguous loss theory to children of parents with an opioid use disorder. Journal of Child & Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 31(2/3), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcap.12209

17.

Merriam-Webster (n.d.). Social construct. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved October 23, 2020, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/social%20construct

18.

P. F.

(2008). Transition experience of parents caring of children with epilepsy: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(4), 543–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.10.009

19.

P. F.

Kuo

H. C.

Chang

K. P.

(2005). Boundary ambiguity, coping patterns and depression in mothers caring for children with epilepsy in Taiwan. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 42(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.07.002

20.

Pierce

(2009). Co-occupation: The challenges of defining concepts original to occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(3), 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686663

21.

Pizur-Barnekow

Knutson

J. M.

(2009). A comparison of the personality dimensions and behavior changes that occur during solitary and co-occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(3), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686657

22.

Sampson

Yeats

Harris

(2012). An evaluation of an ambiguous loss based psychoeducational support group for family members of persons who hoard: A pilot study. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 34(4), 566–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-012-9214-6

23.

Sethi

(2020). Mothering as a relational role: Re-evaluating everyday parenting occupations. Journal of Occupational Science, 27(2), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2019.1666423

24.

Smith

J. M.

Estefan

(2014). Families parenting adolescents with substance abuse—recovering the mother’s voice: A narrative literature review. Journal of Family Nursing, 20(4), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840714554397

25.

Solheim

Zaid

Ballard

(2016). Ambiguous loss experienced by transnational Mexican immigrant families. Family Process, 55(2), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12130

26.

Stokes

Schultz

Alpaslan

(2018). Narrating the journey of sustained recovery from substance use disorder. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-018-0167-0

27.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (2014). The TEDS report: Age of substance use initiation among treatment admissions aged 18 to 30 .

28.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US) & Office of the Surgeon General (2016). Early intervention, treatment, and management of substance use disorders. In Facing Addiction in America: The Surgeon General's Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health. US Department of Health and Human Services.

29.

Timko

Halvorson

Kong

Moos

R. H.

(2015). Social processes explaining the benefits of Al-Anon participation. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29(4), 856–863. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000067

30.

Wayland

Maple

McKay

Glassock

(2016). Holding on to hope: A review of the literature exploring missing persons, hope and ambiguous loss. Death Studies, 40(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2015.1068245

31.

Zemke

Clark

(Eds.). (1996). Occupational science: The evolving discipline. F. A. Davis.