When older adults’ driving abilities decline, automated driving technologies may improve community mobility, engagement, and independence. Most previous research has focused on older persons’ attitudes rather than their use of automated driving technologies. This study examined older Australians’ perceptions and experience of automated vehicle technologies before, during, and after a real-life driving experience, focusing on ease of use, usefulness, safety, acceptance, trust, and confidence. This mixed-methods study included observation of a 6-km test drive using a partially automated vehicle, pre- and post-drive questionnaires, and a post-drive semi-structured interview. Most participants reported positive perceptions and experiences before, during, and after the test drive. Visual analysis of pre/postresponses revealed divergent reactions to the test drive, consistent with the heterogeneity of the older population. Automated driving technologies have potential to contribute to mobility at older ages. Larger-scale studies including actual driving experiences are recommended.
AdamsD. A.NelsonR. R.ToddP. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16, 227–247.
3.
BartlamB.CromeP.LallyF.BeswickA. D.CherubiniA.ClarfieldA. M.EdbrookeD.FarréA.HertoghC.LesauskaiteV. (2012). The views of older people and carers on participation in clinical trials: The PREDICT Study. Clinical Investigation, 2(3), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.4155/cli.12.4
4.
BerkowskyR. W.SharitJ.CzajaS. J. (2017). Factors predicting decisions about technology adoption among older adults. Innovation in Aging, 1(3), Article igy002. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igy002
5.
BuysL.SnowS.van MegenK.MillerE. (2012). Transportation behaviours of older adults: An investigation into car dependency in urban Australia. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 31(3), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2011.00567.x
6.
CarterN.Bryant-LukosiusD.DiCensoA.BlytheJ.NevilleA. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
7.
ChihuriS.MielenzT. J.DiMaggioC. J.BetzM. E.DiGuiseppiC.JonesV. C.LiG. (2016). Driving cessation and health outcomes in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 64(2), 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13931
8.
ClassenS.JeghersM.Morgan-DanielJ.WinterS.KingL.StruckmeyerL. (2019). Smart in-vehicle technologies and older drivers: A scoping review. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 39(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449219830376
9.
ClassenS.MasonJ.HwangboS. W.WersalJ.RogersJ.SisiopikuV. (2021). Older drivers’ experience with automated vehicle technology. Journal of Transport & Health, 22, Article 101107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101107
10.
ClassenS.MasonJ.WersalJ.SisiopikuV.RogersJ. (2020). Older drivers’ experience with automated vehicle technology: Interim analysis of a demonstration study. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 2, Article27. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2020.00027
11.
DavisF. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
12.
Downe-WamboldtB. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006
13.
DuncanM.CharnessN.ChapinT.HornerM.StevensL.RichardA.SoudersD.CruteJ.RiemondyA.MorganD. (2015). Enhanced mobility for aging populations using automated vehicles (Report No. BDV30 977-11). Florida State University Department of Urban and Regional Planning, for the Florida Department of Transportation. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/29733
14.
EbyD. W.MolnarL. J.ZhangL.LouisR. M. S.ZanierN.KostyniukL. P.StanciuS. (2016). Use, perceptions, and benefits of automotive technologies among aging drivers. Injury Epidemiology, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-016-0093-4
15.
FagnantD. J.KockelmanK. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003
16.
GraneheimU. H.LundmanB. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
HartwichF.BeggiatoM.KremsJ. F. (2018). Driving comfort, enjoyment and acceptance of automated driving–effects of drivers’ age and driving style familiarity. Ergonomics, 61(8), 1017–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1441448
19.
HelfandB. K.WebbM.GartaganisS. L.FullerL.KwonC.-S.InouyeS. K. (2020). The exclusion of older persons from vaccine and treatment trials for coronavirus disease 2019—Missing the target. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(11), 1546–1549. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5084
20.
IsbelS.GibsonG. (2019). Exploring the potential of automated vehicle technologies for older drivers. Available from https://osf.io/2eq6z
LiddleJ.GustafssonL.MitchellG.PachanaN. A. (2017). A difficult journey: Reflections on driving and driving cessation from a team of clinical researchers. The Gerontologist, 57(1), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw079
23.
MillonigA. (2019). Connected and automated vehicles: Chances for elderly travellers. Gerontology, 65(5), 571–578. https://doi.org/10.1159/000498908
24.
NielsenT. A. S.HausteinS. (2018). On sceptics and enthusiasts: What are the expectations towards self-driving cars?Transport Policy, 66, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.03.004
25.
PiauA.CampoE.RumeauP.VellasB.NourhashemiF. (2014). Aging society and gerontechnology: A solution for an independent living?The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 18(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-013-0356-5
26.
RahmanM.DebS.StrawdermanL.BurchR.SmithB. (2019). How the older population perceives self-driving vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65, 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.002
27.
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
28.
RobertsonR. D.Woods-FryH.VanlaarW. G.HingM. M. (2019). Automated vehicles and older drivers in Canada. Journal of Safety Research, 70, 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.07.003
SchoettleB.SivakM. (2014). A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia (Report No. UMTRI-2014-21). The University of Michigan Transport Research Institute. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/108384
31.
SenerI. N.ZmudJ.WilliamsT. (2019). Measures of baseline intent to use automated vehicles: A case study of Texas cities. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.12.014
32.
ShergoldI.WilsonM.ParkhurstG. (2016). The mobility of older people, and the future role of connected autonomous vehicles. Centre for Transport and Society, University of the West of England. https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/OutputFile/908712
33.
SoudersD.CharnessN. (2016). Challenges of older drivers’ adoption of advanced driver assistance systems and autonomous vehicles. In ZhouJ.SalvendyG. (Eds.), International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population (pp. 428–440). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39949-2_41
34.
SzetoW.YangL.WongR.LiY.WongS. (2017). Spatio-temporal travel characteristics of the elderly in an ageing society. Travel Behaviour and Society, 9, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2017.07.005
35.
ThakeM.LowryA. (2017). A systematic review of trends in the selective exclusion of older participant from randomised clinical trials. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 72, 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2017.05.017
36.
WeissgerberT. L.MilicN. M.WinhamS. J.GarovicV. D. (2015). Beyond bar and line graphs: Time for a new data presentation paradigm. PLOS Biology, 13(4), Article e1002128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002128
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
