Sensory priming is a technique to facilitate neuroplasticity and improve motor skills after injury. Common sensory priming modalities include peripheral nerve stimulation/somatosensory electrical stimulation (PNS/SES), transient functional deafferentation (TFD), and vibration. The aim of this study was to determine whether sensory priming with a motor intervention results in improved upper limb motor impairment or function after stroke. PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and EMBASE were the databases used to search the literature in July 2020. This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and recommendations for the Cochrane collaboration. In total, 30 studies were included in the analysis: three studies examined TFD, 16 examined PNS/SES, 10 studied vibration, and one combined the three stimulation techniques. Most studies reported significant improvements for participants receiving sensory priming. Given the low risk, it may be advantageous to use sensory-based priming prior to or concurrent with upper limb training after stroke.
AhnJ. Y.KimH.ParkC. B. (2019). Effects of whole-body vibration on upper extremity function and grip strength in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized single-blind controlled trial. Occupational Therapy International, 2019, Article 5820952. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5820952
2.
BologniniN.Pascual-LeoneA.FregniF. (2009). Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 6(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-8
3.
BooJ.-A.MoonS.-H.LeeS.-M.ChoiJ.-H.ParkS.-E. (2016). Effect of whole-body vibration exercise in a sitting position prior to therapy on muscle tone and upper extremity function in stroke patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 28(2), 558–562. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.558
4.
CalabroR. S.NaroA.RussoM.MilardiD.LeoA.FiloniS.TrincheraA.BramantiP. (2017). Is two better than one? Muscle vibration plus robotic rehabilitation to improve upper limb spasticity and function: A pilot randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE, 12(10), Article e0185936. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185936
5.
CareyL. M.MatyasT. A. (2005). Training of somatosensory discrimination after stroke: Facilitation of stimulus generalization. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84(6), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000159971.12096.7f
6.
CarricoC.CheletteK. C.WestgateP. M.PowellE.NicholsL.FleischerA.SawakiL. (2016). Nerve stimulation enhances task-oriented training in chronic, severe motor deficit after stroke: A randomized trial. Stroke, 47(7), 1879–1884. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012671
7.
CarricoC.CheletteK. C.WestgateP. M.Salmon-PowellE.NicholsL.SawakiL. (2016). Randomized trial of peripheral nerve stimulation to enhance modified Constraint-Induced Therapy after stroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 95(6), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000476
8.
CarricoC.WestgateP. M.Salmon PowellE.CheletteK. C.NicholsL.PettigrewL. C.SawakiL. (2018). Nerve stimulation enhances task-oriented training for moderate-to-severe hemiparesis 3-12 months after stroke: A randomized trial. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 97(11), 808–815.
ConfortoA. B.CohenL. G.dos SantosR. L.ScaffM.MarieS. K. N. (2007). Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function in chronic cortico-subcortical strokes. Journal of Neurology, 254(3), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0364-z
11.
ConfortoA. B.FerreiroK. N.TomasiC.dos SantosR. L.MoreiraV. L.Nagahashi MarieS. K.BaltieriS. C.ScaffM.CohenL. G. (2010). Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function after subacute stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 24(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968309349946
12.
ConstantinoC.GaluppoL.RomitiD. (2014, Sep-Oct). Efficacy of mechano-acoustic vibration on strength, pain, and function in poststroke rehabilitation: A pilot study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 21(5), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr2105-391
13.
CraigJ. C. (1999). Grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity. Somatosensory & Motor Research, 16(3), 197–206.
14.
DangH.ChenZ. (2019). Effect of task-oriented training combined with vibration therapy on upper limb function in patients with hemiplegia after stroke. International Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(7), 8710–8717.
15.
DionneT. P.LenkerJ. A.HennessyP.SullivanJ. E. (2020, May/Jun). Use of Electrical Stimulation for People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Survey of Occupational Therapy Practitioners. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(3), 7403205110p7403205111–7403205110p7403205117. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.035584
16.
dos Santos-FontesR. L.Ferreiro de AndradeK. N.SterrA.ConfortoA. B. (2013). Home-based nerve stimulation to enhance effects of motor training in patients in the chronic phase after stroke: A proof-of-principle study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 27(6), 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968313478488
17.
FlemingM. K.SorinolaI. O.Roberts-LewisS. F.WolfeC. D.WellwoodI.NewhamD. J. (2015). The effect of combined somatosensory stimulation and task-specific training on upper limb function in chronic stroke: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 29(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314533613
18.
FloelA.NagorsenU.WerhahnK. J.RavindranS.BirbaumerN.KnechtS.CohenL. G. (2004, Aug). Influence of somatosensory input on motor function in patients with chronic stroke. Annals of Neurology, 56(2), 206–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20170
19.
Fugl-MeyerA. R.JääsköL.LeymanI.OlssonS.SteglindS. (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 7(1), 13–31.
20.
GhazianiE.CouppéC.SiersmaV.SøndergaardM.ChristensenH.MagnussonS. P. (2018). Electrical Somatosensory stimulation in early rehabilitation of arm paresis after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 32(10), 899–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968318799496
IkunoK.KawaguchiS.KitabeppuS.KitauraM.TokuhisaK.MorimotoS.MatsuoA.ShomotoK. (2012). Effects of peripheral sensory nerve stimulation plus task-oriented training on upper extremity function in patients with subacute stroke: A pilot randomized crossover trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 26(11), 999–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215512441476
23.
JebsenR. H.TaylorN.TrieschmannR. B.TrotterM. J.HowardL. A. (1969). An objective and standardized test of hand function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 50(6), 311–319.
24.
LawL. L. F.FongK. N. K.LiR. K. F. (2018). Multisensory stimulation to promote upper extremity motor recovery in stroke: A pilot study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81(11), 641–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022618770141
25.
LeeJ.-S.KimC.-Y.KimH.-D. (2016). Short-term effects of whole-body vibration combined with task-related training on upper extremity function, spasticity, and grip strength in subjects with poststroke hemiplegia: A pilot randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 95(8), 608–617. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000454
26.
LeeY.LinK.WuC.LiaoC.LinJ.ChenC. (2015). Combining afferent stimulation and mirror therapy for improving muscular, sensorimotor, and daily functions after chronic stroke: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 94(10), 859–868. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000271
27.
LinK.-C.ChenY.-T.HuangP.-C.WuC.-Y.HuangW.-L.YangH.-W.LaiH.-T.LuH.-J. (2014). Effect of mirror therapy combined with somatosensory stimulation on motor recovery and daily function in stroke patients: A pilot study. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 113(7), 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2012.08.008
28.
LinK.-C.HuangP.ChenY.WuC.HuangW. (2014). Combining afferent stimulation and mirror therapy for rehabilitating motor function, motor control, ambulation, and daily functions after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 28(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968313508468
29.
LinderS. M.RosenfeldtA. B.DavidsonS.ZimmermanN.PenkoA.LeeJ.ClarkC.AlbertsJ. L. (2019). Forced, not voluntary, aerobic exercise enhances motor recovery in persons with chronic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 33(8), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968319862557
30.
LyleR. C. (1981). A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 4(4), 483–492. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001
31.
MarconiB.FilippiG. M.KochG.GiacobbeV.PecchioliC.VersaceV.CamerotaF.SaraceniV. M.CaltagironeC. (2011). Long-term effects on cortical excitability and motor recovery induced by repeated muscle vibration in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 25(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968310376757
32.
MiyasakaH.OrandA.OhnishiH.TaninoG.TakedaK.SonodaS. (2016). Ability of electrical stimulation therapy to improve the effectiveness of robotic training for paretic upper limbs in patients with stroke. Medical Engineering & Physics, 38(11), 1172–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.07.010
33.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009), Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
34.
MoherD.ShamseerL.ClarkeM.GhersiD.LiberatiA.PetticrewM.ShekelleP.StewartL. A., & PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
35.
NudoR. J. (2013). Recovery after brain injury: Mechanisms and principles. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 887. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00887
36.
PageS. J.FulkG. D.BoyneP. (2012). Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Physical Therapy, 92(6), 791–798.
37.
PanL. H.YangW. W.KaoC. L.TsaiM. W.WeiS. H.FregniF.ChenV. C. F.ChouL. W. (2018). Effects of 8-week sensory electrical stimulation combined with motor training on EEG-EMG coherence and motor function in individuals with stroke. Scientific Reports, 8, Article 9217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27553-4
38.
PomeroyV.AgliotiS. M.MarkV. W.McFarlandD.StinearC.WolfS. L.CorbettaM.FitzpatrickS. M. (2011). Neurological principles and rehabilitation of action disorders: Rehabilitation interventions. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 25(Suppl. 5), 33S–43S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968311410942
39.
RiddingM. C.McKayD. R.ThompsonP. D.MilesT. S. (2001). Changes in corticomotor representations induced by prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation in humans. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112(8), 1461–1469. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00592-2
40.
RittwegerJ. (2010). Vibration as an exercise modality: How it may work, and what its potential might be. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 108(5), 877–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1303-3
41.
SensE.KnorrC.PreulC.MeissnerW.WitteO. W.MiltnerW. H. R.WeissT. (2013). Differences in somatosensory and motor improvement during temporary functional deafferentation in stroke patients and healthy subjects. Behavioural Brain Research, 252, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.048
42.
SensE.TeschnerU.MeissnerW.PreulC.HuonkerR.WitteO. W.MiltnerW. H. R.WeissT. (2012). Effects of temporary functional deafferentation on the brain, sensation, and behavior of stroke patients. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(34), 11773–11779. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5912-11.2012
43.
SeoN. J.KosmopoulosM. L.EndersL. R.HurP. (2014). Effect of remote sensory noise on hand function post stroke. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 934. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00934
44.
SeoN. J.WoodburyM. L.BonilhaL.RamakrishnanV.KautzS. A.DowneyR. J.DellenbachB. H. S.LauerA. W.RoarkC. M.LandersL. E.PhillipsS. K.VatinnoA. A. (2019). TheraBracelet stimulation during task-practice therapy to improve upper extremity function after stroke: A pilot randomized controlled study. Physical Therapy, 99(3), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy143
45.
SteinJ.HughesR.D’AndreaS.TherrienB.NiemiJ.KrebsK.LangoneL.HarryJ. (2010). Stochastic resonance stimulation for upper limb rehabilitation poststroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 89(9), 697–705. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181ec9aa8
46.
StewartJ. C.CramerS. C. (2013). Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke. Stroke, 44(4), 1111–1116. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.674671
47.
StoykovM. E.CorcosD. M.MadhavanS. (2017). Movement-based priming: Clinical applications and neural mechanisms. Journal of Motor Behavior, 49(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2016.1250716
SullivanJ. E.GirardiM.HensleyM.RohausJ.ScheweC.WhitteyC.HansenP.MuirK. (2015). Improving arm function in chronic stroke: A pilot study of sensory amplitude electrical stimulation via glove electrode during task-specific training. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 22(3), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000007
50.
SullivanJ. E.HurleyD.HedmanL. D. (2012). Afferent stimulation provided by glove electrode during task-specific arm exercise following stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 26(11), 1010–1020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215512442915
51.
ViraniS. S.AlonsoA.AparicioH. J.BenjaminE. J.BittencourtM. S.CallawayC. W.CarsonA. P.ChamberlainA. M.ChengS.DellingF. N.ElkindM. S. V.EvensonK. R.FergusonJ. F.GuptaD. K.KhanS. S.KisselaB. M.KnutsonK. L.LeeC. D.LewisT. T., & American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. (2021). Heart disease and stroke Statistics-2021 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 143(8), e254–e743. https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000950
52.
WeissT.SensE.TeschnerU.MeissnerW.PreulC.WitteO. W.MiltnerW. H. R. (2011). Deafferentation of the affected arm: A method to improve rehabilitation?Stroke, 42(5), 1363–1370. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.601138
53.
WolfS. L.CaitlinP. A.EllisM.ArcherA. L.MorganB.PiacentinoA. (2001). Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke, 32(7), 1635–1639. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.7.1635
54.
WolfS. L.WinsteinC. J.MillerJ. P.TaubE.UswatteG.MorrisD.GiulianiC.LightK. E.Nichols-LarsenD.EXCITE Investigators (2006). Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(17), 2095–2104.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
