Powered wheelchair standing devices (PWSDs) allow supported standing for activity; however, little is known about their use. To understand factors affecting use of supported standing for participation among boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and characteristics of successful users, we gathered data over 7 days from boys who had used PWSDs for 24 months, using a smartphone application. We used descriptive statistics to identify factors that affected their participation. Physical/social engagement and independence were motivators for standing in PWSDs. Enablers included positive attitudinal/social environments. Barriers included pain during supported standing and lack of physical environment accessibility. The characteristics of successful users were identified. Supported standing via PWSDs has potential to improve participation for boys with DMD. The disease stage, individual personal factors and environmental supports impact on use. Therapists should carefully consider and manage factors that impact on uptake and sustainability of use.
AndrewsJ. G.WahlR. A. (2018). Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy in adolescents: Current perspectives. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 9, 53–63.
2.
BackhouseM.HardingL. (2006). Do males diagnosed with duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) unnecessarily suffer bowel and bladder problems?Australian and New Zealand Continence Journal, 12(3), 66–73.
3.
BaumC. M. (2011). Fulfilling the promise: Supporting participation in daily life. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(2), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.010
4.
BayleyK.ParkinsonS.JacobyP.CrossD.MorrisS.VorsterN.. . . DownsJ. (2020). Benefits of powered standing wheelchair devices for adolescents with Duchenne muscular dystrophy in the first year of use. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 56, 1419–1425. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14963
5.
BendixenR. M.LottD. J.SenesacC.MathurS.VandenborneK. (2013). Participation in daily life activities and its relationship to strength and functional measures in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(22), 1918–1923.
6.
BendixenR. M.SenesacC.LottD. J.VandenborneK. (2012). Participation and quality of life in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10(1), 1–9.
7.
BirnkrantD.BushbyK.BannC.ApkonS.BlackwellA.BrumbaughD.. . . PandyaS. (2018). Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 1: Diagnosis, and neuromuscular, rehabilitation, endocrine, and gastrointestinal and nutritional management. The Lancet Neurology, 17(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30024-3
BrayP.BundyA.RyanM.NorthK. (2010). Feasibility of a computerized method to measure quality of “everyday” life in children with neuromuscular disorders. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 30(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.3109/01942630903294687
10.
BrayP.BundyA.RyanM.NorthK. (2017). Can in-the-moment diary methods measure health-related quality of life in Duchenne muscular dystrophy?Quality of Life Research, 26(5), 1145–1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1442-z
11.
BrayP.BundyA. C.RyanM. M.NorthK. N.BurnsJ. (2011). Health status of boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A parent’s perspective. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 47(8), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02022.x
12.
BrayP.BundyA. C.RyanM. M.NorthK. N.EverettA. (2010). Health-related quality of life in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Agreement between parents and their sons. Journal of Child Neurology, 25(10), 1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073809357624
13.
CaseL. E.ApkonS. D.EagleM.GulyasA.JuelL.MatthewsD.. . . PosseltH. F. (2018). Rehabilitation management of the patient with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Pediatrics, 142(Supplement 2), S17–S33.
ColverA. (2009). Quality of life and participation. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 51, 656–659.
16.
CraigJ.HildermanC.WilsonG.MisovicR. (2016). Effectiveness of stretch interventions for children with neuromuscular disabilities: Evidence-based recommendations. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 28(3), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000269
17.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
18.
DiciannoB. E.MorganA.LiebermanJ.RosenL. (2016). Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology Society (RESNA) position on the application of wheelchair standing devices: 2013 current state of the literature. Assistive Technology, 28(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2015.1113837
19.
EgilsonS. T.TraustadóttirR. (2009). Theoretical perspectives and childhood participation. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 11(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410802461970
20.
EngelJ. M.KartinD.CarterG.JensenM.JaffeK. M. (2009). Pain in youths with neuromuscular disease. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, 26(5), 405–412.
21.
FeeR. J.HintonV. J. (2011). Resilience in children diagnosed with a chronic neuromuscular disorder. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 32(9), 644–650.
22.
GudgeonS.KirkS. (2015). Living with a powered wheelchair: Exploring children’s and young people’s experiences. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 10(2), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2013.870609
23.
HektnerJ. M.SchmidtJ. A.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life [Calif.]. SAGE.
24.
JessupG.BianS.ChenY.BundyA. (2012). Manual of PIEL survey application.[iPhone/iPod Touch/iPad/iPad mini application]. The University of Sydney.
25.
LueY.-J.ChenS.-S.LuY.-M. (2017). Quality of life of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: From adolescence to young men. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(14), 1408–1413.
26.
LukersmithS. (2012). Guidelines for the prescription of a seating wheelchair. Supplement 1: Wheelchair feature-standing wheelchair. NSW Government, Enable NSW and Lifetime Care Support Authority.
27.
MahJ. K.KorngutL.DykemanJ.DayL.PringsheimT.JetteN. (2014). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the epidemiology of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscular Disorders, 24(6), 482–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2014.03.008
28.
MannleinJ.PangilinanP. H. (2008). Wheelchair seating for children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 1(3), 225–235.
29.
Muscular Dystrophy Campaign. (2011). Wheelchair provision for children and adults with muscular dystrophy and other neuromuscular conditions.
30.
NordstromB.NaslundA.EkenbergL.ZingmarkK. (2014). The ambiguity of standing in standing devices: A qualitative interview study concerning children and parents experiences of the use of standing devices. Physiother Theory Pract, 30(7), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2014.900838
31.
NordstromB.NybergL.EkenbergL.NaslundA. (2014). The psychosocial impact on standing devices. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 9(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2013.807443
32.
PalegG.SmithB.GlickmanL. (2013). Systematic review and evidence-based clinical recommendations for dosing of pediatric supported standing programs. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 25(3), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e318299d5e7
33.
PandyaS.AndrewsJ.CampbellK.MeaneyF. J. (2016). Rehabilitative technology use among individuals with Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 9(1), 45–53.
34.
PangalilaR. F.van den BosG. A.BartelsB.BergenM. P.KampelmacherM. J.StamH. J.RoebroeckM. E. (2015). Quality of life of adult men with Duchenne muscular dystrophy in the Netherlands: Implications for care. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 47(2), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1898
35.
PedlowK.McDonoughS.LennonS.KerrC.BradburyI. (2019). Assisted standing for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10(10), Article CD011550. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011550.pub2
36.
RaghavendraP. (2013). Participation of children with disabilities: Measuring subjective and objective outcomes. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39(4), 461–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12084
37.
RichardsonM.FrankA. O. (2009). Electric powered wheelchairs for those with muscular dystrophy: Problems of posture, pain and deformity. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 4(3), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483100802543114
38.
SchofieldC.EvansK.YoungH.PaguintoS. G.CarrollK.TownsendE.. . . DownsJ. (2020). The development of a consensus statement for the prescription of powered wheelchair standing devices in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Disability Rehabilitation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1810786
SteffensenB.HydeS.AttermannJ.MattssonE. (2002). Reliability of the EK scale, a functional test for non-ambulatory persons with Duchenne dystrophy. Advances in Physiotherapy, 4(1), 37–47.
41.
SteffensenB.HydeS.LyagerS.MattssonE. (2001). Validity of the EK scale: A functional assessment of non-ambulatory individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy or spinal muscular atrophy. Physiotherapy Research International, 6(3), 119–134.
42.
TownsendE.BibeauC.HolmesT. (2016). Supported standing in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 28(3), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000251
43.
VorsterN.EvansK.MurphyN.KavaM.CairnsA.ClarkeD.. . . DownsJ. (2019). Powered standing wheelchairs promote independence, health and community involvement in adolescents with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscular Disorders, 29(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2019.01.010
44.
World Health Organisation. (2007). International classification of functioning, disability, and health: Children & youth version: ICF-CY.
45.
ZebrackiK.DrotarD. (2008). Pain and activity limitations in children with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 50(7), 546–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03005.x
46.
ZhuY.RomittiP. A.Caspers ConwayK. M.KimS.ZhangY.YangM., . . . Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance Tracking Research Network. (2015). Genitourinary health in a population-based cohort of males with Duchenne and Becker Muscular dystrophies. Muscle Nerve, 52(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.24486
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
